Cited by 191Climate variability and modelsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

The equatorial Atlantic oscillation and its response to ENSO

Latif, M., Grötzner, A.·2000·Climate Dynamics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s003820050014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Atlantic Niño is much weaker than its Pacific counterpart.

    “However, the Atlantic Niño is much weaker than its Pacific counterpart (Carton and Huang, 1994, Latif and Grötzner, 2000, Servain et al., 2003, Zebiak, 1993).”
  • At quasi-biennial time scales, a winter El Niño event leads an Atlantic El Niño the following summer with no significant simultaneous relationship.

    “Latif and Grötzner (2000) showed how, at quasi-biennal time scales, a winter El Niño event leads an Atlantic El Niño the following summer with no significant simultaneous relationship.”
  • Our results disagree with Latif and Grötzner (2000), Florenchie et al. (2003), and Wang (2006) with regard to the oceanic wave propagation's role in the origin of the equatorial and South Atlantic SST variability.

    “Our results presented above disagree with Latif and Grötzner (2000), Florenchie et al. (2003), and Wang (2006) with regard to the oceanic wave propagation's role in the origin of the equatorial and South Atlantic SST variability.”
  • The equatorial Atlantic mode differs from ENSO in having significantly weaker variability, a much shorter duration (3 months) of extreme warm/cold events, and spectral characteristics hardly discernible from red noise.

    “The main differences to ENSO are the significantly weaker variability, the much shorter duration (3 months) of extreme warm/cold events, and spectral characteristics hardly discernable from red noise (Zebiak 1993;Carton and Huang 1994;Latif and Grötzner 2000).”

    From Understanding equatorial atlantic interannual variability (2007) · cites this paper as Latif and Grötzner 2000

  • Coupled models that simulate ENSO-like variability in the Atlantic exist with and without flux adjustment.

    “However, coupled models that simulate ENSO-like variability in the Atlantic do exist with (Latif and Grötzner 2000) and without (Wu et al. 2002;Huang et al. 2004) flux adjustment.”

    From Understanding equatorial atlantic interannual variability (2007) · cites this paper as Latif and Grötzner 2000

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 1 · Cited by 191

Authors
Latif, M., & Grötzner, A.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (DE)
Venue
Climate Dynamics
Published
2000-02-04
Volume
16
Issue
2-3
Pages
213-218
ISSN
  • 0930-7575 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0894
OpenAlex
W2055149155
Cited by
191
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Climate Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
ENSO, sea surface temperature, ENSO teleconnections, wind stress variability, coupled ocean-atmosphere model, equatorial Pacific

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review