Cited by 91Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Management of atrial fibrillation by primary care physicians in Germany: baseline results of the ATRIUM registry

Open access
for the ATRIUM investigators, Meinertz, Thomas, Kirch, Wilhelm, Rosin, Ludger, Pittrow, David, Willich, Stefan N., Kirchhof, Paulus·2011·Clinical Research in Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In contrast to surveys in cardiologist settings, presentation and management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care patients is less well studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prospective ATRIUM (Outpatient Registry Upon Morbidity of Atrial Fibrillation) collected data from patients with AF seen by 730 physicians representing a random sample of all primary care physicians in Germany. ATRIUM enrolled 3,667 patients (mean age, 72 ± 9 years; 58% male, mean CHADS(2) score 2.2 ± 1.3), 994 (27.1%) with paroxysmal, 944 (25.7%) with persistent or long-standing persistent and 1,525 (41.6%) with permanent AF (no AF type was specified in 204 patients). Mean duration since initial diagnosis of AF was 61 ± 66 months (median 42, interquartile range 14-88). Reported symptoms included palpitations (43%), shortness of breath (49%), fatigue (49%), dizziness (37%) and angina (20%). Most common concomitant conditions were hypertension (84%), heart failure (43%), coronary artery disease (345%), diabetes (35%) and chronic kidney disease (20%). Prior myocardial infarction was present in 11% of patients, prior stroke in 10% and prior transient ischemic attack in 10%. Antithrombotic medication was used by 93% of the patients (oral anticoagulants, 83%). Rate control therapy was reported in 75% and rhythm control therapy in 33%, often added to rate control. Drugs for rhythm and rate control included ß-blockers (75%), calcium antagonists (15%), digitalis (29%), sodium channel blockers of type IA (quinidine, 1.0%) or IC (flecainide or propafenone, 5%), and potassium channel blockers including amiodarone (11%). In the year prior to enrollment, 46% of the patients had been cardioverted (23% by drugs, 22% electrically), catheter ablation had been performed in 5%, and 10% received a pacemaker or defibrillator. A high proportion (44%) of the patients were hospitalized in the year prior to enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF managed in primary care often receive guideline-conforming therapy including antithrombotic therapy, rate control and rhythm control (numbers given above). Despite this apparent adherence, almost half of the patients were hospitalized in the year prior to enrollment, suggesting that the therapies applied do not stabilize patients sufficiently to keep them out of hospital.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00392-011-0320-5

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
for the ATRIUM investigators, Meinertz, T., Kirch, W., Rosin, L., Pittrow, D., Willich, S. N., & Kirchhof, P.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Sanofi (Germany) (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • University Hospital Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Kirchhof, Paulus
Venue
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
100
Issue
10
Pages
897-905
ISSN
  • 1861-0684 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-0692
OpenAlex
W2025679738
Cited by
91
References
41
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, primary care management, antithrombotic therapy, oral anticoagulants, rate control, rhythm control, cardioversion, catheter ablation, stroke prevention, CHADS2 score, Germany, comorbidities, hospitalization, quality of care, patient-reported symptoms, cardiac pacemaker
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Electric Countershock, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Germany, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Registries, Thromboembolism, Time Factors, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Health Care Surveys, Guideline Adherence, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review