Cited by 33Celiac Disease Research and ManagementWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFood composition and properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Triticum monococcum in patients with celiac disease: a phase II open study on safety of prolonged daily administration

Zanini, Barbara, Villanacci, Vincenzo, De Leo, Luigina, Lanzini, Alberto·2015·European Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Background and aims To assess safety of prolonged daily administration of Triticum monococcum (Tm) using clinical, serological and histological criteria. Tm is an ancient wheat suitable for production of palatable baked goods that contains gluten devoid of strongly immunostimulatory epitopes and potentially safe for celiac disease (CD) patients as suggested by in vitro and ex vivo studies. Methods Protocol involved 60-day administration of 100 g/day Tm water biscuits to CD patients in remission on gluten-free diet. Symptoms Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire (GSRS) and CD-related serology were assessed at time (T) 0, T30 and T60 days, and duodenal biopsy was obtained at T0 and T60. Results Eight patients (F/M: 6/2, median age 26) were enrolled. One patient was excluded at T0 because of positive serology, and two patients dropped out because of symptoms recurrence. In the five patients completing the study, there was no difference in GSRS score at T0 to T60. All patients had Marsh II lesion at T0, four had Marsh III and one had recurrence of dermatitis herpetiformis at T60. CD-related antibodies converted from negative to positive at T60 in three patients. Conclusions Our study shows that Tm is toxic for CD patients as judged on histological and serological criteria, but it was well tolerated by the majority of patients, suggesting that Tm is not a safe cereal for celiacs, but that it may be of value for patients with gluten sensitivity or for prevention of CD…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00394-015-0892-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Spaenij-Dekking L, Kooy-Winkelaar Y, van Veelen P, Drijfhout JW, Jonker H, van Soest L, Smulders MJ, Bosch D, Gilissen LJ, Koning F (2005) Natural variation in toxicity of wheat: potential for selection of nontoxic varieties for celiac disease patients. Gastroenterology 129:797–806 · DOI
  2. Vaccino P, Becker HA, Brandolini A, Salamini F, Kilian B (2009) A catalogue of Triticum monococcum genes encoding toxic and immunogenic peptides for celiac disease patients. Mol Genet Genomics 281:289–300 · DOI
  3. De VM, Luchetti R, Giovannini C, Pogna NE, Saponaro C, Galterio G, Gasbarrini G (1996) In vitro toxicity testing of alcohol-soluble proteins from diploid wheat Triticum monococcum in celiac disease. J Biochem Toxicol 11:313–318 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Londei M, Maiuri L, Quaratino S (2005) A search for the holy grail: non-toxic gluten for celiac patients. Gastroenterology 129:1111–1113 · DOI
  5. De VM, Stammati A, Luchetti R, Silano M, Gasbarrini G, Silano V (1998) Structural specificities and significance for coeliac disease of wheat gliadin peptides able to agglutinate or to prevent agglutination of K562(S) cells. Toxicology 127:97–106 · DOI
  6. Devincenzi M, Dessi MR, Giovannini C, Maialetti F, Mancini E (1995) Agglutinating Activity of Wheat Gliadin Peptide Fractions in Celiac-Disease. Toxicology 96:29–35 · DOI
  7. Pizzuti D, Buda A, D’Odorico A, D’Inca R, Chiarelli S, Curioni A, Martines D (2006) Lack of intestinal mucosal toxicity of Triticum monococcum in celiac disease patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 41:1305–1311 · DOI
  8. Suligoj T, Gregorini A, Colomba M, Ellis HJ, Ciclitira PJ (2013) Evaluation of the safety of ancient strains of wheat in coeliac disease reveals heterogeneous small intestinal T cell responses suggestive of coeliac toxicity. Clin Nutr 32:1043–1049 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Zanini B, Petroboni B, Not T, Pogna N, Lanzini A (2011) Effect of acute administration of Triticum monococcum on small intestinal permeability in patients with celiac disease. Dig Liver Dis 43:S262 · DOI
  10. Marsh MN (1992) Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenterology 102:330–354 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zanini, B., Villanacci, V., De Leo, L., & Lanzini, A.
Affiliations
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
Venue
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2015-04-04
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
1027-1029
ISSN
  • 1436-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-6215
OpenAlex
W2087949688
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
Triticum monococcum, celiac disease, gluten-free diet, food safety, duodenal histology, celiac serology, dermatitis herpetiformis, gastrointestinal symptoms, gluten sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Biopsy, Celiac Disease, Duodenum, Female, Glutens, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Male, Transglutaminases, Surveys and Questionnaires, Triticum, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review