Cited by 41Membrane Separation TechnologiesPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesAntimicrobial agents and applications

Engineering polyethersulfone hollow fiber membrane with improved blood compatibility and antibacterial property

Shi, Zhen-Qiang, Ji, Hai-Feng, Yu, Hai-Chao, Huang, Xue-Lian, Zhao, Wei-Feng, Sun, Shu-Dong, Zhao, Chang-Sheng·2016·Colloid and Polymer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00396-015-3801-7

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, Z.-Q., Ji, H.-F., Yu, H.-C., Huang, X.-L., Zhao, W.-F., Sun, S.-D., & Zhao, C.-S.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Venue
Colloid and Polymer Science
Published
2015-11-21
Volume
294
Issue
2
Pages
441-453
ISSN
  • 0303-402X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1536
OpenAlex
W2294749474
Cited by
41
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Colloid & Polymer Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
polyethersulfone, hollow fiber membranes, hemocompatibility, antibacterial membranes, silver nanoparticles, protein adsorption, platelet adhesion, hemolysis, blood purification, membrane surface modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review