Cited by 104Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Correspondence between in vivo 11C-PiB-PET amyloid imaging and postmortem, region-matched assessment of plaques

Open access
Driscoll, Ira, Troncoso, Juan C., Rudow, Gay, Sojkova, Jitka, Pletnikova, Olga, Zhou, Yun, Kraut, Michael A., Ferrucci, Luigi +6 more·2012·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

The definitive Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis requires postmortem confirmation of neuropathological hallmarks-amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). The advent of radiotracers for amyloid imaging presents an opportunity to investigate amyloid deposition in vivo. The (11)C-Pittsburgh compound-B (PiB)-PET ligand remains the most widely studied to date; however, regional variations in (11)C-PiB binding and the extent of agreement with neuropathological assessment have not been thoroughly investigated. Sojkova and colleagues [35] reported variable agreement between CERAD-based neuropathologic diagnosis of AD lesions and mean cortical PiB, suggesting the need for a more direct quantification of regional Aβ in relation to in vivo imaging. In the present study, we extend these findings by examining the correspondence among regional (11)C-PiB load, region-matched quantitative immunohistological assessments of Aβ and NFTs, and brain atrophy (MRI) in six older Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging participants who came to autopsy (imaging-autopsy interval range 0.2-2.4 years). The total number of Aβ plaques (6E10) and NFTs (PHF1) in paraffin sections from hippocampus, orbito-frontal cortex, anterior and posterior cingulate gyrus, precuneus and cerebellum was quantified using a technique guided by unbiased stereological principles. We report a general agreement between the regional measures of amyloid obtained via stereological assessment and imaging, with significant relationships evident for the anterior (r = 0.83; p = 0.04) and posterior (r = 0.94; p = 0.005) cingulate gyri, and the precuneus (r = 0.94; p = 0.005). No associations were observed between (11)C-PiB load and NFT count for any of the regions examined (p > 0.2 in all regions), or between regional Aβ or NFT counts and corresponding brain volumes. The strong associations of PiB retention with region-matched, quantitative analyses of Aβ in postmortem tissue offer support for the validity of (11)C-PiB-PET imaging as a method for evaluation of plaque burden in vivo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00401-012-1025-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These and other studies strongly support the concept of AD as an amyloid-provoked or facilitated tauopathy, although there is also evidence that both pathologies act in synergy.

    “These and other studies 13,24,133,134 strongly support the concept of AD as being an amyloid-provoked, or facilitated, tauopathy, although there is also evidence that both pathologies act in synergy 135 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 104

Authors
Driscoll, I., Troncoso, J. C., Rudow, G., Sojkova, J., Pletnikova, O., Zhou, Y., Kraut, M. A., Ferrucci, L., Mathis, C. A., Klunk, W. E., O’Brien, R. J., Davatzikos, C., Wong, D. F., & Resnick, S. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Driscoll, Ira
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
2012-08-05
Volume
124
Issue
6
Pages
823-831
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2075575934
Cited by
104
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (Z01AG000191, P50AG005146, AG 05146, ZIAAG000191)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
11C-PiB PET, amyloid imaging, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, postmortem neuropathology, brain atrophy, cingulate gyrus, precuneus, Pittsburgh compound B
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Aniline Compounds, Autopsy, Female, Humans, Male, Thiazoles, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Positron-Emission Tomography, Benzothiazoles, Plaque, Amyloid, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review