The amyloid hypothesis in Alzheimer disease: new insights from new therapeutics
Open accessAbstract
Many drugs that target amyloid-β (Aβ) in Alzheimer disease (AD) have failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy. However, four anti-Aβ antibodies have been shown to mediate the removal of amyloid plaque from brains of patients with AD, and the FDA has recently granted accelerated approval to one of these, aducanumab, using reduction of amyloid plaque as a surrogate end point. The rationale for approval and the extent of the clinical benefit from these antibodies are under intense debate. With the aim of informing this debate, we review clinical trial data for drugs that target Aβ from the perspective of the temporal interplay between the two pathognomonic protein aggregates in AD - Aβ plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles - and their relationship to cognitive impairment, highlighting differences in drug properties that could affect their clinical performance. On this basis, we propose that Aβ pathology drives tau pathology, that amyloid plaque would need to be reduced to a low level (~20 centiloids) to reveal significant clinical benefit and that there will be a lag between the removal of amyloid and the potential to observe a clinical benefit. We conclude that the speed of amyloid removal from the brain by a potential therapy will be important in demonstrating clinical benefit in the context of a clinical trial.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that amyloid pathology likely drives tau spread, and that plaque burden may need to fall to roughly 20 centiloids before clinical benefit can emerge. It concludes that anti-Aβ antibodies can clear plaque, but clinical efficacy remains uncertain and may depend on how quickly amyloid is removed.
Key findings
- Four anti-Aβ antibodies—aducanumab, lecanemab, donanemab and gantenerumab—can remove amyloid plaque. For example, aducanumab at 10 mg/kg Q4W removed 64 CL in Emerge, reaching 21 CL, versus 54 CL in Engage, reaching 37 CL; donanemab at 20 mg/kg Q4W reduced amyloid by 68 CL at 24 weeks, with 68% of patients amyloid-negative by 78 weeks; lecanemab at 10 mg/kg Q2W reduced amyloid from 75 CL to 5 CL over 18 months.
- Longitudinal tau PET data support a threshold effect: Knopman et al. found significant annualized tau PET increases only above 68 CL, with a plateau near 100 CL; Sanchez et al. reported neocortical tau spread at amyloid burdens above 40 CL; Jack et al. found no meaningful tau increase below 22 CL. The authors conclude that lowering amyloid to about 20 CL or less offers the best chance of clinical benefit.
- Agents aimed mainly at soluble or monomeric Aβ—such as solanezumab and crenezumab—did not substantially remove plaque or show clinical efficacy. The BACE inhibitor verubecestat lowered amyloid PET signal by about 20% (~20 CL) at 40 mg but worsened cognitive decline.
- ARIA-E incidence differs across plaque-clearing antibodies and does not clearly track with amyloid removal rate: aducanumab 35%, donanemab 27%, lecanemab about 10%, and gantenerumab 24–39% in an open-label extension. The authors propose a temporal lead-lag model in which amyloid removal precedes any clinical benefit.
Methods
- Narrative review and analysis of phase III and late-stage clinical trial data for drugs targeting Aβ in Alzheimer disease, with emphasis on anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies.
- Synthesizes published and presented data on amyloid PET, tau PET, CSF biomarkers, cognition, ARIA-E and neuropathology; uses the centiloid scale to compare amyloid PET results across ligands and trials.
- Calculates normalized amyloid removal rates and an ARIA-E/amyloid-removal index for antibodies, and presents a hypothetical model of how amyloid clearance speed could affect trial outcomes. No new primary data are reported.
Limitations
- The authors state that the therapeutic hypothesis for anti-Aβ approaches is poorly defined and not readily falsified, that the cellular link between amyloid and tau remains unclear, and that some antibody comparisons rely on small samples and are confounded by baseline amyloid levels and APOE4 status. They also note that ARIA mechanisms are poorly understood.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis; it depends on selected trials and conference/published data, uses estimated centiloid conversions and normalized clearance rates, and notes that the clinical meaningfulness of endpoints such as iADRS is not established.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 133 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
There is no apparent correlation between the rate of amyloid removal and the incidence of ARIA-E.
“There does not appear to be a correlation between rate of amyloid removal and the incidence of ARIA-E, in contrast to what has previously been postulated 91 and as we will discuss below.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] Scherpelz, K. P. et al. Atomic-level differences between brain parenchymal- and cerebrovascular-seeded Abeta fibrils. Sci. Rep. 11, 247 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The amyloid cascade hypothesis is strongly supported by neuropathological and human genetic evidence.
“The amyloid cascade hypothesis of Alzheimer disease (AD), which proposes that deposition of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide in the brain is a central event in disease pathology (Figure 1), is strongly supported by neuropathological and human genetic evidence”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [1] Karran, E., Mercken, M. & De Strooper, B. The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease: an appraisal for the development of therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 698–712 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Goate, A. et al. Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 349, 704–706 (1991). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] Sherrington, R. et al. Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 375, 754–760 (1995). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Rogaev, E. I. et al. Familial Alzheimer’s disease in kindreds with missense mutations in a gene on chromosome 1 related to the Alzheimer’s disease type 3 gene. Nature 376, 775–778 (1995). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Jonsson, T. et al. A mutation in APP protects against Alzheimer’s disease and age-related cognitive decline. Nature 488, 96–99 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Amyloid-beta pathology drives tau pathology in Alzheimer disease.
“we propose that Aβ pathology drives tau pathology”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
“in aggregate the data strongly support the concept that amyloid provokes the spread of tau pathology that ultimately causes neuronal loss”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [26] Knopman, D. S. et al. Association of initial beta-amyloid levels with subsequent flortaucipir positron emission tomography changes in persons without cognitive impairment. JAMA Neurol. 78, 217–228 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Sanchez, J. S. et al. The cortical origin and initial spread of medial temporal tauopathy in Alzheimer’s disease assessed with positron emission tomography. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabc0655 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Lowering soluble or oligomeric amyloid-beta, amyloid plaques, or both to a non-pathological level below the threshold that triggers tau pathology spread will produce a therapeutic benefit.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
- Interpretationreasoning
Amyloid plaque burden must be lowered to approximately 20 centiloids for a significant clinical benefit to become apparent.
“amyloid plaque would need to be reduced to a low level (~20 centiloids) to reveal significant clinical benefit”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [26] Knopman, D. S. et al. Association of initial beta-amyloid levels with subsequent flortaucipir positron emission tomography changes in persons without cognitive impairment. JAMA Neurol. 78, 217–228 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [89] Klein, G. et al. Gantenerumab reduces amyloid-beta plaques in patients with prodromal to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a PET substudy interim analysis. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 11, 101 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Lowering soluble or oligomeric amyloid-beta, amyloid plaques, or both to a non-pathological level below the threshold that triggers tau pathology spread will produce a therapeutic benefit.
- Interpretationreasoning
How quickly a therapy removes amyloid from the brain will matter for showing clinical benefit in a trial.
“the speed of amyloid removal from the brain by a potential therapy will be important in demonstrating clinical benefit in the context of a clinical trial”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Lowering soluble or oligomeric amyloid-beta, amyloid plaques, or both to a non-pathological level below the threshold that triggers tau pathology spread will produce a therapeutic benefit.
- Interpretationreasoning
A delay is expected between removal of amyloid and the ability to observe clinical benefit.
“there will be a lag between the removal of amyloid and the potential to observe a clinical benefit”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Lowering soluble or oligomeric amyloid-beta, amyloid plaques, or both to a non-pathological level below the threshold that triggers tau pathology spread will produce a therapeutic benefit.
- Premisecitation
Aducanumab received accelerated approval based on reduction of amyloid plaque as a surrogate endpoint that had not been validated as predicting clinical benefit.
“This decision was based on the effects of aducanumab on the surrogate endpoint of reduction of amyloid plaque in the brain of patients with AD, which at that point was not validated as being predictive of clinical benefit”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] US Food and Drug Administration. Drug approval package: Aduhelm (aducanumab-avwa). Office of Neurology’s summary review memorandum. FDA https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2021/761178Orig1s000TOC.cfm (2021).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Alexander, G. C. et al. Revisiting FDA approval of aducanumab. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 769–771 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Substantial amyloid pathology is already present in the neocortex decades before overt Alzheimer disease symptoms appear.
“Substantial amyloid pathology is already present in the neocortex decades prior to overt AD symptomatology”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Jansen, W. J. et al. Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 313, 1924–1938 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Amyloid-beta deposition in the brain follows a stepwise spatial pattern, beginning in temporobasal and frontomedial regions and then extending to the remaining neocortex, primary sensory-motor cortex, and striatum.
“Aβ deposition occurs in a step-wise manner, starting in the temporobasal and frontomedial areas, then spreading to the remaining neocortex, the primary sensory-motor cortex and finally the striatum”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [14] Thal, D. R., Rub, U., Orantes, M. & Braak, H. Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology 58, 1791–1800 (2002). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Grothe, M. J. et al. In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition. Neurology 89, 2031–2038 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Mattsson, N., Palmqvist, S., Stomrud, E., Vogel, J. & Hansson, O. Staging beta-amyloid pathology with amyloid positron emission tomography. JAMA Neurol. 76, 1319–1329 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Amyloid does not have a direct and significant effect on cognitive impairment.
“Given the lack of a direct and significant effect of amyloid on cognitive impairment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
There is no direct clinical or preclinical in vivo evidence that disaggregating plaques releases damaging oligomeric amyloid-beta species.
“to our knowledge there is no direct clinical or preclinical in vivo evidence that this occurs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Benilova, I., Karran, E. & De Strooper, B. The toxic Abeta oligomer and Alzheimer’s disease: an emperor in need of clothes. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 349–357 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The threshold hypothesis fits current understanding of Alzheimer disease pathology.
“Recent evidence suggests that the threshold hypothesis is concordant with our current understanding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In cognitively normal participants, only those with amyloid burden above 68 centiloids showed a significant annualized increase in tau PET SUVR.
“They demonstrated that only in the >68 CL group was there a significant increase in annualized change in tau PET standard uptake value ratio (SUVR).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Knopman, D. S. et al. Association of initial beta-amyloid levels with subsequent flortaucipir positron emission tomography changes in persons without cognitive impairment. JAMA Neurol. 78, 217–228 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The trigger scenario can be discounted because amyloid deposition may begin about 20 years before cognitive changes.
“The trigger scenario can be discounted as the onset of amyloid deposition may occur ~20 years prior to cognitive alterations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Jansen, W. J. et al. Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 313, 1924–1938 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Robust tau pathology is more commonly observed in patients who have amyloid pathology.
“Studies demonstrate that robust tau pathology is more commonly seen in patients with amyloid pathology”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Mattsson-Carlgren, N. et al. The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 94, e2233–e2244 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The pattern of tau pathology can differ substantially between individuals.
“the pattern of tau pathology can differ significantly from person to person”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Pontecorvo, M. J. et al. A multicentre longitudinal study of flortaucipir (18F) in normal ageing, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Brain 142, 1723–1735 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The annualized rate of tau PET SUVR increase reached a plateau at about 100 centiloids, except in the entorhinal cortex where it continued to rise.
“the annualized rate in tau PET SUVR increase reached a plateau at approximately 100 CL, with the exception of the entorhinal cortex, where the rate continued to increase over the study period”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Knopman, D. S. et al. Association of initial beta-amyloid levels with subsequent flortaucipir positron emission tomography changes in persons without cognitive impairment. JAMA Neurol. 78, 217–228 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The action of an anti-amyloid therapeutic is distant from the mechanisms that could produce clinical benefit.
“A critically important aspect of this hypothesis is that the action of an anti-Aβ/amyloid therapeutic is distant from the mechanisms by which potential clinical benefit may be derived.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Lowering soluble or oligomeric amyloid-beta, amyloid plaques, or both to a non-pathological level below the threshold that triggers tau pathology spread will produce a therapeutic benefit.
- Interpretationcitation
The driver scenario for amyloid's pathological effect is unlikely because amyloid pathology plateaus before significant cognitive impairment begins.
“the driver scenario seems unlikely because multiple studies show that amyloid pathology is reaching a plateau in the brain prior to the onset of significant cognitive impairment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Villemagne, V. L. et al. Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 12, 357–367 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a small exploratory study, gantenerumab at 200 mg showed evidence of amyloid removal of about 20 centiloids compared with baseline.
“In this small exploratory study, there was evidence for the removal of amyloid compared to baseline (~20 CL) at the 200 mg dose”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Ostrowitzki, S. et al. A phase III randomized trial of gantenerumab in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 9, 95 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lecanemab at the top dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks reduced amyloid from 75 to 5 centiloids over 18 months.
“At the top dose of 10mg/kg Q2W, amyloid was reduced from 75 CL to 5 CL over the 18-month duration of the study”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [71] Reyderman, L. et al. BAN2401 and ARIA-E in early Alzheimer’s disease: pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic time-to-event analysis from the phase 2 study in early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 7, S17 (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [72] Aisen, P. et al. AHEAD 3-45 study design: a global study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with BAN2401 for 216 weeks in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease with intermediate amyloid (A3 trial) and elevated amyloid (A45 trial). Alzheimers Dement. 16 (Suppl. 9), e044511 (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Bapineuzumab failed its primary outcome measures.
“Bapineuzumab failed its primary outcome measures”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Liu, E. et al. Amyloid-β 11C-PiB-PET imaging results from 2 randomized bapineuzumab phase 3 AD trials. Neurology 85, 692–700 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Scarlet Road, the top gantenerumab dose of 225 mg produced only a 4.8% reduction in amyloid-beta from baseline, about 3 centiloids.
“at the top dose of 225 mg, there was only a 4.8% reduction in levels of Aβ from baseline (~3 CL)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Nilsberth, C. et al. The ‘Arctic’ APP mutation (E693G) causes Alzheimer’s disease by enhanced Aβ protofibril formation. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 887–893 (2001). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In phase Ib studies, aducanumab at 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks removed 44 centiloids at 26 weeks and 57 centiloids at 54 weeks, bringing patients to 27 centiloids.
“this top dose removed 44 CL at 26 weeks and 57 CL at 54 weeks, bringing patients to a level of 27 CL”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Budd Haeberlein, S. et al. Evaluation of aducanumab efficacy in early Alzheimer’s disease. Presented at 15th International Conference on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases and related neurological disorders (2021).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Four anti-Aβ/amyloid antibodies have demonstrated the ability to clear amyloid plaque.
“The field now has 4 anti-Aβ/amyloid antibodies that have demonstrated the ability to clear amyloid plaque”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The DIAD data support the idea that a threshold amount of brain amyloid is required to drive cognitive impairment.
“While the cohort sizes were small, these data further support the notion that a threshold amount of brain amyloid is required to drive cognitive impairment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Anti-amyloid antibodies that mainly target amyloid plaque rather than monomeric amyloid-beta are able to remove amyloid plaque.
“Thus far we can conclude that anti-Aβ antibodies that predominantly target amyloid plaque and not monomeric Aβ are able to remove amyloid plaque.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Donanemab at 20 mg/kg every 4 weeks reduced the florbetapir amyloid PET signal by 68 centiloids from baseline at 24 weeks.
“at 20mg/kg Q4W there was a 68 CL reduction from baseline levels at 24 weeks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] Wessels, A. M. et al. A combined measure of cognition and function for clinical trials: the integrated Alzheimer’s disease rating scale (iADRS). J. Prev. Alzheimers Dis. 2, 227–241 (2015).
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Amyloid should be reduced to below about 20 CL to give the best possible opportunity for demonstrating clinical benefit.
“Nevertheless, we conclude from these longitudinal studies that amyloid should be reduced to below 20 CL, or thereabouts, to give the best possible opportunity for demonstrating clinical benefit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A level of 20 centiloids or less is an accepted threshold for amyloid negativity.
“From this work, ≤20 CL is an accepted threshold for amyloid negativity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [85] La Joie, R. et al. Multisite study of the relationships between antemortem [(11)C]PIB-PET Centiloid values and postmortem measures of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 205–216 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [86] Dore, V. et al. Comparison of (18)F-florbetaben quantification results using the standard centiloid, MR-based, and MR-less CapAIBL((R)) approaches: validation against histopathology. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 807–816 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [87] Amadoru, S. et al. Comparison of amyloid PET measured in centiloid units with neuropathological findings in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 12, 22 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [88] Jack, C. R. et al. Predicting future rates of tau accumulation on PET. Brain 143, 3136–3150 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Such antibodies cause ARIA-E to varying degrees as an adverse event.
“Such antibodies cause ARIA-E to a varying degree as an adverse event.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The efficacy of anti-Aβ antibodies may depend on the stage of AD.
“Finally, the efficacy of anti-Aβ antibodies may well be dependent on the stage of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
If alternative anti-Aβ antibodies with superior amyloid removal rates are available, patient recruitment into trials of slower antibodies will be difficult, assuming other properties such as ARIA propensity are equivalent.
“Secondly, conducting such trials when alternative anti-Aβ antibodies are available that are superior with respect to rate of amyloid removal will make patient recruitment difficult, assuming other properties of the antibodies -such as propensity to cause ARIA -are equivalent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: When comparing recruitment difficulty between anti-Aβ antibodies, other properties such as propensity to cause ARIA are equivalent.
- Premisenone given
At the conclusion of the aducanumab phase III studies, there was a 17 CL difference between the failed Engage study and the successful Emerge study.
“At the conclusion of the aducanumab phase III studies there is a difference of 17 CL between a failed study (Engage) and a successful study (Emerge).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If amyloid removal takes several years, there is a risk that the disease will progress to a stage where tau pathology is well established and its propagation self-sustaining.
“If the removal of amyloid takes several years, there will be a risk that the disease will have progressed to a stage where tau pathology is well-established and its propagation self-sustaining.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If the lead-and-lag model reflects the clinical situation, removing amyloid rapidly affords a greater opportunity to reveal clinical efficacy within a given time.
“If this model reflects the clinical situation, it has some important implications for clinical development.Removing amyloid rapidly affords a greater opportunity to reveal clinical efficacy within a given time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In the donanemab Trailblazer trial, clinical improvement begins at week 36, when amyloid levels have already been profoundly reduced.
“In the donanemab Trailblazer trial, it is notable that clinical improvement begins to manifest at week 36, at which time amyloid levels have already been profoundly reduced 84”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Clark, C. M. et al. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 11, 669–678 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The authors consider it unlikely that the 17 CL difference between Engage and Emerge can be biologically reconciled with the different clinical outcomes.
“It seems unlikely to the authors that this very modest difference can be reconciled biologically to the different clinical outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Amelioration of cognitive decline is unlikely to closely follow therapy-mediated amyloid reduction in time, because the therapeutic mechanism acts through several unknown biological steps before the clinical effect.
“It is unlikely that the amelioration of cognitive decline will temporally closely follow the therapy-mediated reduction in amyloid load, given that the therapeutic mechanism acts at several (currently unknown) biological steps removed from the clinical effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
The anti-Aβ antibodies differ in key features that could be relevant to their clinical performance.
“However, the antibodies differ in key features that could be relevant to their clinical performance, as shown in Table 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Clinical trials of some anti-Aβ antibodies have shown signs of clinical improvement that still require confirmation in adequately powered studies.
“clinical trials of some have shown signs of clinical improvement that remain to be confirmed by appropriately powered studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
In the aducanumab phase III trials, amyloid negativity was only reached towards the end of the study period, assuming linear amyloid removal between 6 and 18 months.
“In the phase III trials with aducanumab, amyloid negativity was only being reached towards the end of the study period, assuming a linear removal of amyloid between timepoints 6 and 18 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Amyloid removal in the aducanumab phase III trials was linear between timepoints 6 and 18 months.
- Premisenone given
Current data suggest that tau pathology becomes accelerated only when individuals reach an amyloid level above about 67 CL.
“current data suggest that only as individuals reach a level of amyloid >~67 CL does tau pathology become accelerated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Donanemab, which targets pE3Aβ, mediates rapid amyloid removal.
“It is notable that donanemab, targeting pE3Aβ, mediates rapid amyloid removal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The literature suggesting that ARIA-E is a feature of the speed of amyloid removal is not well supported by overall clinical experience.
“While some literature suggests that ARIA-E is a feature of the speed of amyloid removal, in fact this is not well supported by the clinical experience overall.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The incidence of ARIA is elevated in ApoE4 carriers across all studies with plaque-removing monoclonal antibodies.
“It is clear from all the studies with the plaque removing mAbs considered here that the incidence of ARIA is elevated in ApoE4 carriers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These two factors probably explain the differences in ARIA-E and amyloid removal.
“These two factors probably explain the differences in ARIA-E and amyloid removal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Insel and colleagues found that a trial with 2,000 participants per group over 4 years would have 80% power to detect a 25% treatment effect in cognitively unimpaired amyloid-positive individuals.
“This study revealed that a study with 2,000 participants per group in a trial lasting 4 years would provide 80% power to reveal a 25% treatment effect -a huge undertaking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] Donohue, M. C. et al. The preclinical Alzheimer cognitive composite: measuring amyloid-related decline. JAMA Neurol. 71, 961–970 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
ARIA-E is probably mediated by a response between the antibody and vascular amyloid.
“ARIA-E is probably mediated by a response between the antibody and vascular amyloid”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Different antibodies seem to induce different rates of amyloid clearance and ARIA-E.
“One clear differentiating factor is that different antibodies seem to induce different rates of amyloid clearance and ARIA-E.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There is very little numerical difference in placebo versus treatment changes in CDR-SB and MMSE in the Emerge, Expedition and Trailblazer-Alz studies.
“In fact, there is very little numerical difference in the placebo versus treatment changes in CDR-SB and MMSE in the Emerge, Expedition and Trailblazer-Alz studies 113 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] Klunk, W. E. et al. The Centiloid project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimers Dement. 11, 1–15.e4 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Demonstrating a reduction in tau pathology that correlates with improved cognition and activities of daily living may be adopted as a surrogate endpoint for multiple therapeutic approaches.
“demonstrating a reduction in tau pathology that correlates with improvement in cognitive performance and activities of daily living may well be adopted as a surrogate endpoint for multiple therapeutic approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The Emerge study with high-dose aducanumab showed a difference from placebo in CDR-SB and MMSE of 0.39 and 0.6, respectively.
“To place that into context, the Emerge study with high-dose aducanumab demonstrated a difference from placebo in the CDR-SB and MMSE assessments of 0.39 and 0.6, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent breakthroughs in detecting specific phosphorylated tau fragments in blood, some with apparent high specificity for early AD, open new perspectives.
“Recent breakthroughs with the detection of specific phosphorylated tau fragments in blood, some with apparent high specificity for early AD, are opening new perspectives in this regard 97 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [97] Alexander, G. C., Emerson, S. & Kesselheim, A. S. Evaluation of aducanumab for Alzheimer disease: scientific evidence and regulatory review involving efficacy, safety, and futility. JAMA 325, 1717–1718 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Patients without brain amyloid who receive aducanumab would have no likelihood of clinical benefit.
“otherwise patients may receiving aducanumab with no likelihood of clinical benefit 109 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] Niewoehner, J. et al. Increased brain penetration and potency of a therapeutic antibody using a monovalent molecular shuttle. Neuron 81, 49–60 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The authors conclude that, especially under the lead-and-lag concept, demonstrating amyloid removal is a measure of target engagement rather than clinical efficacy.
“We conclude that, especially within the concept of a 'lead and lag', demonstration of amyloid removal is a measure of target engagement rather than of clinical efficacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The FDA licensed aducanumab without requiring patients to be tested for brain amyloid before prescription.
“Surprisingly, the FDA licensed aducanumab without a requirement that patients prescribed aducanumab should first be tested to determine whether they are likely to have amyloid in their brains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Prior work suggests the minimal clinically important difference for CDR-SB and MMSE in mild AD is 1.63 and 2.3, respectively.
“Prior work has suggested that the minimal clinically important difference for the CDR-SB and MMSE assessments in mild AD is 1.63 and 2.3, respectively 112 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] Liu, K. Y., Schneider, L. S. & Howard, R. The need to show minimum clinically important differences in Alzheimer’s disease trials. Lancet Psychiatry 8, 1013–1016 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Several studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients clinically diagnosed with AD do not have amyloid in their brains.
“As several studies have demonstrated that a significant proportion of patients that are clinically diagnosed with AD do not have amyloid in their brain”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
There is a paucity of gold-standard neuropathology data on clinical trial participants.
“One significant gap in our understanding is the paucity of gold-standard neuropathology data on clinical trial participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The DIAN study had insufficient power to detect cognitive benefit.
“Of note, the study had insufficient power to detect cognitive benefit 47 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Ultsch, M. et al. Structure of crenezumab complex with Abeta shows loss of beta-hairpin. Sci. Rep. 6, 39374 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cross-sectional and longitudinal human cohort biomarker studies support a scenario in which amyloid pathology precedes tau pathology and then neurodegeneration.
“In contrast, cross-sectional and longitudinal human cohort studies of biomarkers support a scenario in which amyloid pathology (Aβ42 lowering in CSF, positive amyloid PET imaging) precedes tau pathology (tau-PET and phospho-Tau elevation in CSF) and then neurodegeneration 126-128 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [126] Cho, H. et al. Progressive tau accumulation in Alzheimer disease: 2-year follow-up study. J. Nucl. Med. 60, 1611–1621 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [127] Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. Longitudinal tau PET in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 141, 1517–1528 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [128] Aschenbrenner, A. J., Gordon, B. A., Benzinger, T. L. S., Morris, J. C. & Hassenstab, J. J. Influence of tau PET, amyloid PET, and hippocampal volume on cognition in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 91, e859–e866 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Amyloid accrual in the brain is a continuum after initial deposition.
“The accrual of amyloid in the brain is a continuum after initial deposition occurs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Amyloid PET ligands display 85%-98% sensitivity and 87%-100% specificity for Aβ plaques against postmortem CERAD or NIA-AA standards.
“18 F-flutemetamol, 18 F-florbetaben and 18 F-florbetapir tracers display 85%-98% sensitivity and 87%-100% specificity for Aβ plaques when using the postmortem truth standards of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD (CERAD) or the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association 85,[136][137][138] .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [85] La Joie, R. et al. Multisite study of the relationships between antemortem [(11)C]PIB-PET Centiloid values and postmortem measures of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 205–216 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [136] Clark, C. M. et al. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-beta plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 11, 669–678 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [137] Navitsky, M. et al. Standardization of amyloid quantitation with florbetapir standardized uptake value ratios to the Centiloid scale. Alzheimers Dement. 14, 1565–1571 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [138] Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 13, 205–216 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Gantenerumab has an incidence of ARIA-E of 48%.
“| Gantenerumab | 13 1 | 42 b /27 | 67 | 52 | 2.5 | 48 b | 19.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Boche, D., Denham, N., Holmes, C. & Nicoll, J. A. Neuropathology after active Abeta42 immunotherapy: implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 120, 369–384 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Gantenerumab has a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 2.5 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg.
“| Gantenerumab | 13 1 | 42 b /27 | 67 | 52 | 2.5 | 48 b | 19.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Boche, D., Denham, N., Holmes, C. & Nicoll, J. A. Neuropathology after active Abeta42 immunotherapy: implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 120, 369–384 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The calculations of normalized dose assume an average patient weight of 70 kg.
- Premisecitation
Dore et al. established an optimal cutoff of 19 CL separating negative from positive amyloid burden as assessed by neuropathology.
“An optimal cut off of 19 CL was established as separating negative from positive amyloid burden as assessed by neuropathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Amadoru, S. et al. Comparison of amyloid PET measured in centiloid units with neuropathological findings in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 12, 22 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Studies without post-mortem data determined similar CL thresholds, for example 19 CL as the value beyond which the rate of change in amyloid PET reliably increases.
“Studies that have not used post-mortem data, but statistical analyses of patient cognitive status correlated with amyloid PET imaging have determined similar CL threshold values, for example, 19 CL as the value beyond which the rate of change in amyloid PET reliably increases 141 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Gantenerumab has an ARIA-E/amyloid removal rate index of 19.2.
“| Gantenerumab | 13 1 | 42 b /27 | 67 | 52 | 2.5 | 48 b | 19.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Boche, D., Denham, N., Holmes, C. & Nicoll, J. A. Neuropathology after active Abeta42 immunotherapy: implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 120, 369–384 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lecanemab has an incidence of ARIA-E of 10%.
“| Lecanemab | 20 | 62 c /43 | 30 2 | 52 | 2.4 | 10 | 4.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [71] Reyderman, L. et al. BAN2401 and ARIA-E in early Alzheimer’s disease: pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic time-to-event analysis from the phase 2 study in early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 7, S17 (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [114] Miles, L. A., Crespi, G. A., Doughty, L. & Parker, M. W. Bapineuzumab captures the N-terminus of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid-beta peptide in a helical conformation. Sci. Rep. 3, 1302 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lecanemab has a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 2.4 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg.
“| Lecanemab | 20 | 62 c /43 | 30 2 | 52 | 2.4 | 10 | 4.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [71] Reyderman, L. et al. BAN2401 and ARIA-E in early Alzheimer’s disease: pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic time-to-event analysis from the phase 2 study in early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 7, S17 (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [114] Miles, L. A., Crespi, G. A., Doughty, L. & Parker, M. W. Bapineuzumab captures the N-terminus of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid-beta peptide in a helical conformation. Sci. Rep. 3, 1302 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The calculations of normalized dose assume an average patient weight of 70 kg.
- Premisecitation
Lecanemab has an ARIA-E/amyloid removal rate index of 4.2.
“| Lecanemab | 20 | 62 c /43 | 30 2 | 52 | 2.4 | 10 | 4.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [71] Reyderman, L. et al. BAN2401 and ARIA-E in early Alzheimer’s disease: pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic time-to-event analysis from the phase 2 study in early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 7, S17 (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [114] Miles, L. A., Crespi, G. A., Doughty, L. & Parker, M. W. Bapineuzumab captures the N-terminus of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid-beta peptide in a helical conformation. Sci. Rep. 3, 1302 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Bapineuzumab removes approximately 7 centiloids in 12 patients.
“| Bapineuzumab | 0.3 | ~7 a /12 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 9 | - |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [60] Liu, E. et al. Amyloid-β 11C-PiB-PET imaging results from 2 randomized bapineuzumab phase 3 AD trials. Neurology 85, 692–700 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Bohrmann, B. et al. Gantenerumab: a novel human anti-Abeta antibody demonstrates sustained cerebral amyloid-beta binding and elicits cell-mediated removal of human amyloid-beta. J. Alzheimers Dis. 28, 49–69 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lecanemab removes 62 centiloids in 43 patients.
“| Lecanemab | 20 | 62 c /43 | 30 2 | 52 | 2.4 | 10 | 4.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [71] Reyderman, L. et al. BAN2401 and ARIA-E in early Alzheimer’s disease: pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic time-to-event analysis from the phase 2 study in early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 7, S17 (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [114] Miles, L. A., Crespi, G. A., Doughty, L. & Parker, M. W. Bapineuzumab captures the N-terminus of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid-beta peptide in a helical conformation. Sci. Rep. 3, 1302 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Aducanumab has a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 5.5 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg.
“| Aducanumab | 6 3 | 64 d /109 | 67 2 | 78 | 5.5 | 35 | 6.4 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Englund, H. et al. Sensitive ELISA detection of amyloid-beta protofibrils in biological samples. J. Neurochem. 103, 334–345 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The calculations of normalized dose assume an average patient weight of 70 kg.
- Premisecitation
Aducanumab removes 64 centiloids in 109 patients.
“| Aducanumab | 6 3 | 64 d /109 | 67 2 | 78 | 5.5 | 35 | 6.4 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Englund, H. et al. Sensitive ELISA detection of amyloid-beta protofibrils in biological samples. J. Neurochem. 103, 334–345 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Aducanumab has an incidence of ARIA-E of 35%.
“| Aducanumab | 6 3 | 64 d /109 | 67 2 | 78 | 5.5 | 35 | 6.4 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Englund, H. et al. Sensitive ELISA detection of amyloid-beta protofibrils in biological samples. J. Neurochem. 103, 334–345 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Aducanumab has an ARIA-E/amyloid removal rate index of 6.4.
“| Aducanumab | 6 3 | 64 d /109 | 67 2 | 78 | 5.5 | 35 | 6.4 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Englund, H. et al. Sensitive ELISA detection of amyloid-beta protofibrils in biological samples. J. Neurochem. 103, 334–345 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Gantenerumab removes 42 centiloids in 27 patients.
“| Gantenerumab | 13 1 | 42 b /27 | 67 | 52 | 2.5 | 48 b | 19.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Boche, D., Denham, N., Holmes, C. & Nicoll, J. A. Neuropathology after active Abeta42 immunotherapy: implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 120, 369–384 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 55
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 34
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFifteen potential therapeutics aimed at amyloid-beta have been tested in phase III trials, and eleven of them clearly failed to show clinical efficacy.
“fifteen potential therapeutics intended to target the role of Aβ in AD in various ways, including inhibition of enzymes involved in Aβ production and removal of Aβ from the brain using antibodies, have been tested in phase III trials (Table 1).Yet so far, eleven of these have clearly failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA hypothetical anti-Aβ antibody with a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 10 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg has 88 weeks remaining post amyloid negativity.
“10 | 16 | 88”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA hypothetical anti-Aβ antibody with a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 1.0 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg takes 160 weeks to reach 20 CL from a baseline of 100 CL.
“1.0 | 160 | 0”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataA hypothetical anti-Aβ antibody with a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 5 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg takes 32 weeks to reach 20 CL from a baseline of 100 CL.
“5 | 32 | 72”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA hypothetical anti-Aβ antibody with a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 5 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg has 72 weeks remaining post amyloid negativity.
“5 | 32 | 72”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA hypothetical anti-Aβ antibody with a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 2.5 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg takes 64 weeks to reach 20 CL from a baseline of 100 CL.
“2.5 | 64 | 40”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA hypothetical anti-Aβ antibody with a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 10 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg takes 16 weeks to reach 20 CL from a baseline of 100 CL.
“10 | 16 | 88”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA hypothetical anti-Aβ antibody with a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 2.5 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg has 40 weeks remaining post amyloid negativity.
“2.5 | 64 | 40”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA hypothetical anti-Aβ antibody with a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 1.0 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg has 0 weeks remaining post amyloid negativity.
“1.0 | 160 | 0”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe data support the idea that amyloid provokes tau pathology spread, which ultimately causes neuronal loss.
“in aggregate the data strongly support the concept that amyloid provokes the spread of tau pathology that ultimately causes neuronal loss”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] De Strooper, B. & Karran, E. The cellular phase of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 164, 603–615 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThere is both a spatial and temporal separation between the main pathologies of Alzheimer disease.
“Thus, there is both a spatial and temporal disconnect between the cardinal pathologies of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe spread of neurofibrillary tangle pathology correlates best with, and possibly causes, substantial cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease.
“it has become evident that it is the spread of NFT pathology that correlates best, and possibly causes, substantial cognitive impairment in AD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] Lowe, V. J. et al. Cross-sectional associations of tau-PET signal with cognition in cognitively unimpaired adults. Neurology 93, e29–e39 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Pontecorvo, M. J. et al. Relationships between flortaucipir PET tau binding and amyloid burden, clinical diagnosis, age and cognition. Brain 140, 748–763 (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn participants with varied ages, cognitive status, and amyloid loads, tau pathology first appeared in the transentorhinal cortex and spread into the neocortex at amyloid burdens above 40 centiloids.
“They demonstrated that the initial site of tau pathology was in the transentorhinal cortex and that further spreading into neocortex occurred at amyloid burdens of >40 CL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Sanchez, J. S. et al. The cortical origin and initial spread of medial temporal tauopathy in Alzheimer’s disease assessed with positron emission tomography. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabc0655 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenA therapeutic hypothesis that is poorly defined cannot be readily falsified.
“A therapeutic hypothesis that is poorly defined is not readily falsified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe therapeutic hypothesis for anti-amyloid approaches is poorly defined.
“there is a poorly defined therapeutic hypothesis that reducing either soluble (oligomeric) Aβ, or amyloid plaques, or both, in the brain to non-pathological levels -that is, below the level that provokes tau pathology spread -will mediate a therapeutic benefit”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Lowering soluble or oligomeric amyloid-beta, amyloid plaques, or both to a non-pathological level below the threshold that triggers tau pathology spread will produce a therapeutic benefit.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIndividuals vary in their response to amyloid, but once a threshold is exceeded, tau pathology spread accelerates.
“It is likely that individuals have a variable response to amyloid, but that once a threshold is surpassed, the spread of tau pathology is accelerated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationReductions in monomeric amyloid-beta, and by extension oligomeric forms, are not efficacious in the patient populations tested and do not cause substantial plaque removal.
“we conclude that reductions in monomeric Aβ, and by extension, oligomeric forms of Aβ 53 , are not efficacious in the patient populations tested and also do not mediate significant removal of plaque”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Brothers, H. M., Gosztyla, M. L. & Robinson, S. R. The physiological roles of amyloid-β peptide hint at new ways to treat Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 10, 118 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAbout one third of the aducanumab trial duration was used to titrate up to 10 mg/kg to reduce ARIA-E, so patients only approached amyloid negativity near the end of Emerge and did not reach it in Engage.
“In the protocol, about one third of the duration of the trials was used in titrating up to the 10mg/kg dose to minimize the incidence of ARIA-E, such that patients were only approaching amyloid negativity towards the end of the 78-week trial in Emerge and were not at amyloid negativity in Engage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease, gantenerumab lowered amyloid from 38 to 22 centiloids in asymptomatic patients and from 102 to 80 centiloids in symptomatic patients.
“In the asymptomatic cohort, gantenerumab lowered amyloid from a baseline of 38 CL to 22 CL; and in the symptomatic cohort, from a baseline of 102 CL to 80 CL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Ultsch, M. et al. Structure of crenezumab complex with Abeta shows loss of beta-hairpin. Sci. Rep. 6, 39374 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataIn the Marguerite Road open-label extension, at 2 years about half of patients were amyloid-negative, and in mild AD patients first receiving drug during the extension amyloid was reduced from baseline by 78 centiloids.
“At the 2-year time point, approximately 50% of the patients were deemed to be amyloid-negative (defined as <24 CL by the sponsor) and in those patients with mild AD who started receiving drug for the first time during the open-label extension, amyloid had been reduced from baseline by 78 CL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe decrease in amyloid of about 5 centiloids from baseline with 1.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab was very modest and therapeutically irrelevant.
“The decrease in amyloid (~5 CL) from baseline in the 1.0 mg/kg group was very modest and therapeutically irrelevant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Bohrmann, B. et al. Gantenerumab: a novel human anti-Abeta antibody demonstrates sustained cerebral amyloid-beta binding and elicits cell-mediated removal of human amyloid-beta. J. Alzheimers Dis. 28, 49–69 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationStrong suppression of amyloid-beta production by BACE inhibition reduced amyloid deposition by about 20% and produced a modest increase in cognitive impairment, probably through unwanted on-target effects.
“Strong suppression of Aβ production, via BACE inhibition, reduced amyloid deposition by about 20% and resulted in a modest increase in cognitive impairment, probably due to unwanted on-target effects mediated via inhibiting other BACE substrates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Hampel, H. et al. The β-secretase BACE1 in Alzheimer’s disease. Biol. Psychiatry 89, 745–756 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAnti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies that mainly bind monomeric amyloid-beta do not cause substantial plaque removal and lack clinical efficacy.
“anti-Aβ mAbs that predominantly bind to monomeric Aβ do not mediate substantial removal of plaque and lack clinical efficacy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [42] Honig, L. S. et al. Trial of solanezumab for mild dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 321–330 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Siemers, E. R. et al. Phase 3 solanezumab trials: secondary outcomes in mild Alzheimer’s disease patients. Alzheimers Dement. 12, 110–120 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEmerge showed a statistically significant benefit on the CDR scale at the 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks dose of aducanumab, while Engage did not.
“Emerge showed statistically significant benefit using the CDR assessment scale at the 10 mg/kg QW4 dose of aducanumab, while the other study, Engage, did not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease study, asymptomatic patients did not show cognitive decline, so efficacy could not be demonstrated, and gantenerumab was without efficacy in the symptomatic cohort.
“In this study, the asymptomatic patients did not demonstrate cognitive decline, and hence there was no possibility of the drug demonstrating efficacy.In the symptomatic cohort, gantenerumab was without efficacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Ultsch, M. et al. Structure of crenezumab complex with Abeta shows loss of beta-hairpin. Sci. Rep. 6, 39374 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Emerge, 64 centiloids of amyloid were removed, bringing levels to 21 centiloids by 78 weeks; in Engage, 54 centiloids were removed, bringing levels to 37 centiloids.
“In Emerge, 64 CL of amyloid were removed at the 10mg/kg QW4 dose, bringing levels down to 21 CL by the end of the 78-week study 77 .In Engage, rather less amyloid was removed, 54 CL, bringing amyloid levels to 37 CL at 78 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Saido, T. C. et al. Dominant and differential deposition of distinct beta-amyloid peptide species, A beta N3(pE), in senile plaques. Neuron 14, 457–466 (1995). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataIn the DIAD gantenerumab trial, 60% of enrolled patients were cognitively normal (CDR=0), and the placebo group's amyloid level rose from 39 CL at baseline to 51 CL over 4 years without cognitive decline.
“In the DIAD trial of gantenerumab, 60% of the patients enrolled were cognitively normal (CDR=0) with a baseline amyloid level in the placebo group of 39 CL that increased to 51 CL over the course of the 4-year study.These patients failed to demonstrate cognitive decline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn TRAILBLAZER-ALZ, donanemab reduced amyloid by 68 centiloids from a baseline of 108 centiloids by 24 weeks, with 40% of patients amyloid-negative, and by 78 weeks 68% were amyloid-negative.
“By 24 weeks, donanemab treatment resulted in a 68 CL reduction in amyloid from a starting baseline of 108 CL, and 40% of patients were amyloid-negative (defined by the sponsor as <24 CL).By 78 weeks, 68% of patients were amyloid-negative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Clark, C. M. et al. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 11, 669–678 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataIn the DIAD trial, placebo patients who were symptomatic at baseline (CDR >= 0.5) declined cognitively, with amyloid increasing from 97 CL to 104 CL.
“Those patients in the placebo arm that were symptomatic (CDR ≥ 0.5) at baseline further declined during the course of the study: their baseline amyloid was 97 CL and increased to 104 CL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn cognitively normal subjects aged 65-85, there is no increase in annualized tau PET signal below 21 centiloids, but above 68 centiloids tau PET signal significantly increases.
“Knopman et al. 26 have shown that there is no increase in annualized tau PET signal in cognitively normal subjects aged 65-85 years below a threshold of 21 CL, but that above 68 CL, tau PET signal significantly increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Knopman, D. S. et al. Association of initial beta-amyloid levels with subsequent flortaucipir positron emission tomography changes in persons without cognitive impairment. JAMA Neurol. 78, 217–228 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe composite flortaucipir tau PET signal was not significantly lowered in donanemab-treated patients, although individual regions of interest did show significant reductions.
“while the composite flortaucipir tau PET signal was not statistically significantly lowered in donanemab-treated patients, individual regions of interest did show significant reductions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Clark, C. M. et al. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 11, 669–678 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn cognitively unimpaired subjects, there is no meaningful increase in tau PET signal below 22 centiloids, although a 20% increase in amyloid PET SUVr up to about 35 centiloids was associated with a statistically significant increase in annualized tau PET signal.
“Jack et al. 89 have shown there is no meaningful increase in tau PET signal in cognitively unimpaired subjects below 22 CL, although an increase amyloid PET SUVr signal of 20% (up to ~35 CL) was associated with a statistically significant increase in annualized tau PET signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] Klein, G. et al. Gantenerumab reduces amyloid-beta plaques in patients with prodromal to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a PET substudy interim analysis. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 11, 101 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe acceleration of tau pathology caused by increasing amyloid burden may differ in magnitude from the deceleration caused by therapeutic amyloid reduction, because in the latter case tau pathology is more extensive and has more opportunity to propagate.
“The acceleration of tau pathology progression mediated by the increase in amyloid burden may be different in magnitude to its deceleration consequent to a therapeutically mediated reduction in amyloid, because in the latter case tau pathology will be more extensive with a greater opportunity to propagate further.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThere are signs of clinical efficacy with anti-amyloid plaque antibodies, but these must be interpreted cautiously.
“There are signs of clinical efficacy with these antibodies, but we must still be cautious in our interpretation of these.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDonanemab met the primary outcome measure in TRAILBLAZER-ALZ, but the clinical meaningfulness of the iADRS has not been established.
“Donanemab met the primary outcome measure, although the clinical meaningfulness of the iADRS has not yet been established”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Clark, C. M. et al. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 11, 669–678 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe anti-Aβ antibodies have quite different propensities to cause ARIA-E, which limits the dose administered and determines whether dose titration is required.
“The antibodies have quite different propensities to cause ARIA-E, which will limit the dose administered and determine whether dose titration is required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe antibodies differ in discriminating properties including targeted Aβ epitope, presence of the epitope in CAA, parenchymal plaque and soluble Aβ, affinity, brain exposure, non-specific binding, half-life, and dose-limiting side effects such as ARIA-E.
“However, they have other discriminating properties: the Aβ epitope targeted by the antibody, and whether the epitope is present in CAA, parenchymal plaque and soluble Aβ; the affinity of the antibody for its epitope; the antibody exposure in the brain; extent of non-specific binding; half-life in the circulation; and dose-limiting side effects (for example, ARIA-E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe authors hypothesize that the rate of amyloid removal in the aducanumab trials was not fast enough to provide convincing clinical benefit within the study duration.
“Further, we hypothesize that the rate of amyloid removal was not fast enough to provide convincing clinical benefit within the duration of the study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe reduction of brain amyloid is the major therapeutic hypothesis for all four antibodies, with the possible exception of lecanemab.
“As the reduction in brain amyloid represents the major therapeutic hypothesis for all four antibodies (with the potential exception of lecanemab)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningThe longer a clinical trial takes, the larger the group sizes needed to ensure sufficient statistical power because of patient attrition.
“Firstly, given the normal patient attrition rate from clinical trials, the longer the trial takes to conduct, the greater the group sizes need to be to ensure sufficient statistical power at the trial's conclusion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe faster amyloid is removed, the more rapidly patients would show amelioration of tau pathology propagation and consequent cognitive decline.
“then the faster this is achieved, the more rapidly patients would manifest an amelioration of tau pathology propagation and consequent cognitive decline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe authors' comparison of antibody-mediated amyloid clearance and ARIA-E incidence should be treated cautiously because some data are based on small sample sizes.
“These data should be treated cautiously because in some cases they are based on a small sample size.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAll anti-Aβ antibodies discussed are of the same IgG1 isotype.
“All of the anti-Aβ antibodies discussed here are the same IgG1 isotype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe authors propose a 'lead and lag' scenario in which amyloid removal leads and clinical benefit lags.
“Therefore, we propose a 'lead and lag' scenario: amyloid removal will lead and the clinical benefit will lag (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAD is a complex interplay of cellular pathology probably involving multiple cell types and cellular processes.
“We have previously highlighted that AD is a complex interplay of cellular pathology probably involving multiple cell types and cellular processes 22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] De Strooper, B. & Karran, E. The cellular phase of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 164, 603–615 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmyloid removal is faster in patients with high baseline amyloid levels, which confounds direct comparison of anti-Aβ antibodies.
“There is also evidence that amyloid removal is faster in those patients with high baseline levels, further confounding a direct comparison of anti-Aβ antibodies 90 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Boche, D., Denham, N., Holmes, C. & Nicoll, J. A. Neuropathology after active Abeta42 immunotherapy: implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 120, 369–384 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningClinical efficacy will be demonstrated after TΔA, the time taken to reduce amyloid to a low level such as <=20 CL; thereafter full clinical benefit will manifest and at TΔE a sufficient separation between placebo and treated groups will be evidenced.
“Clinical efficacy will be demonstrated after TΔA -the time taken to reduce amyloid to a low level, for example, ≤ 20 CL.Thereafter, the full clinical benefit of amyloid negativity will be manifested and at TΔE a sufficient separation between the placebo and treated groups will be evidenced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAll four anti-Aβ antibodies might eventually render patients amyloid negative, but they may not be equivalent in their ability to provide clinical efficacy over the same duration.
“Thus, while all 4 anti-Aβ antibodies under consideration might be able to render patients 'amyloid negative' over time, they may not be equivalent in their ability to provide clinical efficacy over the same time duration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe relationship between plaque removal and clinical benefit is likely to be complex.
“The relationship between the removal of plaque and demonstrating a clinical benefit, if that is possible, is likely to be complex, as we have discussed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningA period of low or no amyloid status would be required to enable the brain to restore homeostasis.
“it seems reasonable to believe that a period of low/no amyloid status would be required to enable the brain to restore homeostasis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAnti-Aβ antibodies that slowly reduce amyloid to negativity may eventually ameliorate cognitive decline, but this will be challenging to demonstrate.
“Anti-Aβ antibodies that reduce amyloid levels slowly to an amyloid-negative status may also eventually demonstrate an amelioration in cognitive decline, but this will be challenging to demonstrate for a variety of reasons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDonanemab has a high incidence of ARIA (27%), which was not evident in preclinical studies.
“Interestingly, donanemab has a high incidence of ARIA (27%), although this was not evident in preclinical studies 56 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Sperling, R. A. et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: recommendations from the Alzheimer’s Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 7, 367–385 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPiB may bind preferentially to amyloid plaques containing pE3Aβ, and if other amyloid PET ligands do the same, this preferential binding might overestimate the extent of amyloid clearance.
“There are data that show that the amyloid PET ligand PiB may bind preferentially to amyloid plaques containing the pE3Aβ species 93,94 and although it is not known whether this is the case for other amyloid PET ligands, such preferential binding might over-estimate the extent of amyloid clearance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [93] Higuchi, M. Visualization of brain amyloid and microglial activation in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 6, 137–143 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94] Insel, P. S. et al. Determining clinically meaningful decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology 93, e322–e333 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe donanemab phase II trial met its primary endpoint for slowing decline on the iADRS, indicating that the amyloid load threshold for clinical benefit was reached.
“However, this phase II trial also met its primary endpoint regarding slowing decline measured using the iADRS indicating that the amyloid load threshold to see clinical benefit was reached in this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEarly therapeutic intervention in AD is more likely to demonstrate clinical benefit, but demonstrating that benefit becomes increasingly difficult and expensive.
“While therapeutic intervention early in the disease process is more likely to demonstrate clinical benefit, demonstrating that benefit becomes increasingly more difficult and expensive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenFor an amyloid-removing therapy, unless a prevention trial is being considered, patients who are amyloid positive must be selected.
“For a therapeutic removing amyloid, unless a preventative trial is being considered, then patients who are amyloid positive will have to be selected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe iADRS and preclinical Alzheimer cognitive composite are clinical instruments designed to reveal treatment effects with greater sensitivity.
“One response to these problems has been the design of clinical instruments that purport to be able to reveal treatment effects with greater sensitivity: for example, the iADRS 83 or the preclinical Alzheimer cognitive composite 96 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [83] Mintun, M. A. et al. Donanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1691–1704 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [96] Zetterberg, H. & Blennow, K. Moving fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease from research tools to routine clinical diagnostics. Mol. Neurodegener. 16, 10 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRecruiting participants below the ~67 CL amyloid threshold might result in slow or no cognitive decline in the placebo arm, requiring large group sizes and long-duration trials.
“Recruiting participants below this threshold might result in slow/no cognitive decline in the placebo arm, requiring large group sizes and long duration trials as discussed above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDonanemab induces a 90% anti-drug antibody response, which might be connected to the incidence of ARIA.
“Donanemab also induces a 90% anti-drug antibody response, and it might be that this, in some way, is connected to the incidence of ARIA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRecruiting participants who already have cognitive impairment reduces screen failure rates because they are more likely to have advanced disease, but it reduces the likelihood of slowing disease progression.
“While recruiting participants that already have cognitive impairment reduces the trial enrollment screen failure rate, as they are more likely to have pathologically advanced disease, this will, however, reduce the likelihood of slowing disease progression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe Aβ epitope targeted by the antibody is important, and current anti-Aβ antibodies are effectively plaque-specific.
“The Aβ epitope targeted by the antibody is important and current anti-Aβ antibodies are effectively plaque-specific.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationpE3Aβ is present at low concentrations but is often associated with dense core plaques.
“The pE3Aβ is present at low concentrations, but often associated with dense core plaques 56,78 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Sperling, R. A. et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: recommendations from the Alzheimer’s Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 7, 367–385 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [78] Kuo, Y.-M., Emmerling, M. R., Woods, A. S., Cotter, R. J. & Roher, A. E. Isolation, chemical characterization, and quantitation of Aβ 3-pyroglutamyl peptide from neuritic plaques and vascular amyloid deposits. Biochem Biophys Res. Commun. 237, 188–191 (1997). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBapineuzumab caused significant ARIA-E but removed very little amyloid.
“For example, bapinezumab caused significant ARIA-E but removed very little amyloid 61 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Bohrmann, B. et al. Gantenerumab: a novel human anti-Abeta antibody demonstrates sustained cerebral amyloid-beta binding and elicits cell-mediated removal of human amyloid-beta. J. Alzheimers Dis. 28, 49–69 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVascular amyloid is somewhat different in composition and potentially conformation from parenchymal Aβ plaques.
“interestingly vascular amyloid is somewhat different in its composition 79 and potentially, its conformation from the parenchymal Aβ plaques 92 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [79] Lowe, S. L. et al. Donanemab (LY3002813) dose-escalation study in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dementia 7, e12112 (2021).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [92] Maeda, J. et al. Longitudinal, quantitative assessment of amyloid, neuroinflammation, and anti-amyloid treatment in a living mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease enabled by positron emission tomography. J. Neurosci. 27, 10957–10968 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe authors consider the relationship between amyloid removal and potential clinical benefit to be more subtle than the FDA's view.
“We consider that the relationship between the removal of amyloid and potential consequent clinical benefit may be more subtle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe FDA granted accelerated approval to aducanumab and stated that reduction of amyloid is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit.
“The FDA has controversially granted accelerated approval to aducanumab and has opined that the reduction of amyloid is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit 7,9,[98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107] .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [7] Knopman, D. S., Jones, D. T. & Greicius, M. D. Failure to demonstrate efficacy of aducanumab: an analysis of the EMERGE and ENGAGE trials as reported by Biogen, December 2019. Alzheimers Dementia 17, 696–701 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Alexander, G. C. et al. Revisiting FDA approval of aducanumab. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 769–771 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [98] Alexander, G. C. & Karlawish, J. The problem of aducanumab for the treatment of Alzheimer disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 174, 1303–1304 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [99] Cummings, J. et al. Aducanumab produced a clinically meaningful benefit in association with amyloid lowering. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 13, 98 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [100] Doody, R. Editorial: Consequences of the FDA decision on aducanumab for patient care and research. J. Prev. Alzheimers Dis. 8, 393–395 (2021).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [101] Dunn, B., Stein, P. & Cavazzoni, P. Approval of aducanumab for Alzheimer disease-the FDA’s perspective. JAMA Intern. Med. 181, 1276–1278 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [102] Dunn, B., Stein, P., Temple, R. & Cavazzoni, P. An appropriate use of accelerated approval- aducanumab for Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 856–857 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [103] Petersen, R. C. Aducanumab: what about the patient? Ann. Neurol. 90, 334–335 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [104] Rabinovici, G. D. Controversy and progress in Alzheimer’s disease - FDA approval of aducanumab. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 771–774 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [105] Salloway, S. & Cummings, J. Aducanumab, amyloid lowering, and slowing of Alzheimer disease. Neurology 97, 543–544 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn tauopathies such as frontotemporal lobar dementia, tau pathology can spread without amyloid, so removing amyloid may not halt or sufficiently slow tau spread in AD to significantly ameliorate cognitive decline.
“In tauopathies such as frontal temporal lobar dementia, tau pathology can spread through the brain in the absence of amyloid, and so there is still the risk that removing amyloid will not halt, or sufficiently slow, tau pathology spread in AD to provide significant amelioration of cognitive decline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the DIAN cohort, gantenerumab significantly reduced amyloid plaques and CSF total tau, phospho-tau181 and neurofilament light chain, confirming an interaction between Aβ and tau.
“In the DIAN cohort, treatment of patients with familial (caused by autosomal dominant mutations) Alzheimer disease with gantenerumab significantly reduced amyloid plaques and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) total tau, phospho-tau181 and neurofilament light chain, confirming an interaction between Aβ and tau.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLarge cross-sectional neuropathological studies of autopsied brain suggest that tau pathology is prevalent long before amyloid pathology appears, potentially supporting the concept that tau pathology leads to amyloid pathology.
“From large cross-sectional neuropathological studies of autopsied brain 124 , it appears that tau pathology is already prevalent long before amyloid pathology appears, potentially supporting the concept that tau pathology leads to amyloid pathology 125 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [124] Palmqvist, S. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarker trajectories with increasing amyloid deposition in Alzheimer’s disease. EMBO Mol. Med. 11, e11170 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [125] Hansson, O. Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Med. 27, 954–963 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAutosomal dominant mutations in MAPT lead to neuronal tangle pathology and frontotemporal dementia but not amyloid plaques, suggesting that tau pathology does not induce Aβ pathology.
“Autosomal dominant mutations to the MAPT (tau) gene lead to neuronal tangle pathology and frontotemporal dementia but not to amyloid plaques 122,123 , suggesting that tau pathology does not induce Aβ pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [122] Arnsten, A. F. T., Datta, D., Tredici, K. D. & Braak, H. Hypothesis: Tau pathology is an initiating factor in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 17, 115–124 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [123] Jack, C. R. Jr. et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 9, 119–128 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe challenge is to determine which elements of the disease-associated microglial response propel the disease process versus those that are merely responses to it.
“The challenge for researchers is determining those elements of the disease-associated microglial response that propel the disease process, versus those that are merely responses to it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe NFT tau PET signal was significantly associated with impairment on various cognitive measures, and when stratified by amyloid status there was no significant evidence that amyloid modified the effect of the NFT tau PET signal.
“The NFT tau PET signal was significantly associated with impairment of various measures of cognition, on a region-of-interest basis.When the NFT tau PET signal was stratified by amyloid status, there was no significant evidence that amyloid modified the effect of the NFT tau PET signal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Lowe, V. J. et al. Cross-sectional associations of tau-PET signal with cognition in cognitively unimpaired adults. Neurology 93, e29–e39 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn individuals with autosomal dominant mutations in APP or Presenilin, altered Aβ generation causing early plaque deposition initiates the disease, and patients invariably develop the full spectrum of tau pathology.
“In individuals with autosomal dominant mutations in genes coding for amyloid precursor protein (APP) or Presenilin 119 , alterations in Aβ generation that result in early deposition of plaque initiate the disease and patients invariably develop the full spectrum of tau pathology 120,121 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [119] Hutton, M. et al. Association of missense and 5′-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 393, 702–705 (1998). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [120] Goedert, M., Crowther, R. A. & Spillantini, M. G. Tau mutations cause frontotemporal dementias. Neuron 21, 955–958 (1998). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [121] Braak, H., Thal, D. R., Ghebremedhin, E. & Del Tredici, K. Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: age categories from 1 to 100 years. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 70, 960–969 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a cross-sectional study, Lowe et al. studied 579 cognitively unimpaired adults; median age was 70; abnormal NFT tau PET was seen in 20% and abnormal Aβ in 34%.
“In a cross-sectional study, Lowe et al. 20 studied the association of neurofibrillary (NFT) tau PET and Aβ PET on cognition in 579 cognitively unimpaired adults.The participants' median age was 70 and abnormal NFT tau PET, defined as a signal in the entorhinal region, was seen in 20%, while abnormal Aβ was seen in 34% of the cohort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Lowe, V. J. et al. Cross-sectional associations of tau-PET signal with cognition in cognitively unimpaired adults. Neurology 93, e29–e39 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBecause current anti-Aβ antibodies target different epitopes, they may remove different populations or types of amyloid plaques.
“It is possible that as the current anti-Aβ antibodies target different epitopes, they may remove different populations or types of amyloid plaques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA 7-year longitudinal study of 60 clinically normal elderly found that increases in tau PET signal were significantly associated with cognitive decline; increases in amyloid PET were associated with increases in tau PET signal but not directly with cognitive decline.
“A 7-year longitudinal study was conducted in which 60 clinically normal elderly participants received repeated tau and amyloid PET scans and cognitive assessments 132 .This analysis revealed that increases in tau PET signal were significantly associated with cognitive decline, and while increases in amyloid PET were associated with increases in tau PET signal, it was not significantly directly ass”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [132] Busche, M. A. & Hyman, B. T. Synergy between amyloid-beta and tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1183–1193 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLa Joie et al. found that a CL threshold of 12.2 provided 88% accuracy, 89% sensitivity and 86% specificity for none to sparse amyloid on the CERAD scale, and a CL threshold of 23.5 provided 89% accuracy, 86% sensitivity and 96% specificity for moderate to frequent amyloid.
“A CL threshold of 12.2 provided 88% accuracy, 89% sensitivity and 86% specificity for none to sparse amyloid in the CERAD scale, and a CL threshold of 23.5 provided 89% accuracy, 86% sensitivity and 96% specificity for moderate to frequent amyloid in the CERAD scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Dore, V. et al. Comparison of (18)F-florbetaben quantification results using the standard centiloid, MR-based, and MR-less CapAIBL((R)) approaches: validation against histopathology. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 807–816 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationClarke et al. concluded that the appropriate threshold for amyloid positivity/negativity was 24 CL (=1.1 SUVr).
“The authors concluded the appropriate threshold for amyloid positivity/negativity was 24 CL (=1.1 SUVr).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [139]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [140]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Centiloid Project provides guidance to convert SUVr information from different amyloid PET ligands into a common 100-point scale.
“this prompted the Centiloid Project, which has provided guidance on how to convert SUVr information from different amyloid PET ligands into a common, 100-point scale 116 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] Hardy, J. The relationship between amyloid and tau. J. Mol. Neurosci. 20, 203–206 (2003). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationJack et al. studied 59 cognitively unimpaired amyloid-negative, 37 cognitively unimpaired amyloid-positive and 30 cognitively impaired amyloid-positive participants over 12-15 months; tau PET signal did not increase in cognitively unimpaired amyloid-negative participants but did in the other groups.
“Jack et al. 130 studied 59 cognitively unimpaired, amyloid-negative participants; 37 cognitively unimpaired amyloid-positive participants and 30 cognitively impaired amyloid-positive participants in a 12-15 month study.This study showed that in cognitively unimpaired amyloid-negative participants, tau PET signal did not increase, while it did in cognitively unimpaired amyloid-positive and cognitIV”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] La Joie, R. et al. Prospective longitudinal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease correlates with the intensity and topography of baseline tau-PET. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaau5732 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationAschenbrenner et al. retrospectively studied 152 participants; only tau PET signal significantly predicted cognitive decline, while high amyloid levels were also associated with tau-related cognitive decline.
“Aschenbrenner et al. 131 performed a retrospective study of 152 participants who had received at least 1 flortaucipir tau PET scan and 1 florbetapir amyloid PET scan within a year, and ≥2 clinical and cognitive assessments.All participants entering the study had equal to or less than 0.5 on the CDR scale; that is, they were cognitively normal or with very mild AD.The statistical analysis demonstr”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [131] Ossenkoppele, R. et al. Discriminative accuracy of [18F]flortaucipir positron emission tomography for Alzheimer disease vs other neurodegenerative disorders. JAMA 320, 1151–1162 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThese and other studies strongly support the concept of AD as an amyloid-provoked or facilitated tauopathy, although there is also evidence that both pathologies act in synergy.
“These and other studies 13,24,133,134 strongly support the concept of AD as being an amyloid-provoked, or facilitated, tauopathy, although there is also evidence that both pathologies act in synergy 135 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [13] Jagust, W. Imaging the evolution and pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 687–700 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Mattsson-Carlgren, N. et al. The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 94, e2233–e2244 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [133] Driscoll, I. et al. Correspondence between in vivo (11)C-PiB-PET amyloid imaging and postmortem, region-matched assessment of plaques. Acta Neuropathol. 124, 823–831 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [134] Curtis, C. et al. Phase 3 trial of flutemetamol labeled with radioactive fluorine 18 imaging and neuritic plaque density. JAMA Neurol. 72, 287–294 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [135] Sabri, O. et al. Florbetaben PET imaging to detect amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: phase 3 study. Alzheimers Dement. 11, 964–974 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmadoru et al. found the optimum threshold between low and high amyloid plaque was 21 CL, and 10 CL for none versus any.
“The optimum threshold between low vs high amyloid plaque was 21 CL; and 10 CL for none vs. any.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] Jack, C. R. et al. Predicting future rates of tau accumulation on PET. Brain 143, 3136–3150 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationA CL value of <=20 is a reasonable definition of 'amyloid negativity'.
“In summary, these studies show that a CL value of ≤ 20 is a reasonable value to define 'amyloid negativity'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBapineuzumab has a normalized rate of amyloid removal of 0 CL/4 wk/10mg/kg.
“| Bapineuzumab | 0.3 | ~7 a /12 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 9 | - |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [60] Liu, E. et al. Amyloid-β 11C-PiB-PET imaging results from 2 randomized bapineuzumab phase 3 AD trials. Neurology 85, 692–700 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Bohrmann, B. et al. Gantenerumab: a novel human anti-Abeta antibody demonstrates sustained cerebral amyloid-beta binding and elicits cell-mediated removal of human amyloid-beta. J. Alzheimers Dis. 28, 49–69 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The calculations of normalized dose assume an average patient weight of 70 kg.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBapineuzumab has an incidence of ARIA-E of 9%.
“| Bapineuzumab | 0.3 | ~7 a /12 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 9 | - |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [60] Liu, E. et al. Amyloid-β 11C-PiB-PET imaging results from 2 randomized bapineuzumab phase 3 AD trials. Neurology 85, 692–700 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [61] Bohrmann, B. et al. Gantenerumab: a novel human anti-Abeta antibody demonstrates sustained cerebral amyloid-beta binding and elicits cell-mediated removal of human amyloid-beta. J. Alzheimers Dis. 28, 49–69 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Lowering soluble or oligomeric amyloid-beta, amyloid plaques, or both to a non-pathological level below the threshold that triggers tau pathology spread will produce a therapeutic benefit.
“there is a poorly defined therapeutic hypothesis that reducing either soluble (oligomeric) Aβ, or amyloid plaques, or both, in the brain to non-pathological levels -that is, below the level that provokes tau pathology spread -will mediate a therapeutic benefit”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Amyloid removal in the aducanumab phase III trials was linear between timepoints 6 and 18 months.
“assuming a linear removal of amyloid between timepoints 6 and 18 months”
The authors state this as an assumption.
When comparing recruitment difficulty between anti-Aβ antibodies, other properties such as propensity to cause ARIA are equivalent.
“assuming other properties of the antibodies -such as propensity to cause ARIA -are equivalent”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The calculations of normalized dose assume an average patient weight of 70 kg.
“Assumes average 70 kg patient weight.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aducanumab binds to 3-7 amino acids of Aβ, targeting soluble oligomers and insoluble fibrils.
“Aducanumab (1) binds to 3-7 amino acids of Aβ, targeting soluble oligomers and insoluble fibrils.418,419”
From Recent advances in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms, clinical trials and new drug development strategies. (2024) · cites this paper as [419]
In the section on Aβ-targeting approaches (page not provided), the paper says aducanumab binds amino acids 3–7 of Aβ and is specific for amyloid plaque. This supports the binding site and plaque-targeting portion of the claim, but not the assertion that it targets soluble oligomers. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDonanemab targets pyroglutamate-modified Aβ, binding specifically to plaques.
“Donanemab (10) targets pyroglutamate-modified Aβ, binding specifically to plaques.419”
From Recent advances in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms, clinical trials and new drug development strategies. (2024) · cites this paper as [419]
Lowering amyloid levels may help lessen the disease's related neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment.
“Lowering amyloid levels may help to lessen the disease’s related neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment, according to research [73,74].”
From Recent Advances in Therapeutics for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease (2024) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Bapineuzumab has reported amyloid removal but a zero removal rate
MinorTable 2 lists about 7 centiloids of amyloid removal over 71 weeks at a nonzero dose, yet gives the normalized removal rate as zero. A positive amount removed over that period cannot yield a zero rate under the stated normalization method.
“| Bapineuzumab | 0.3 | ~7 a /12 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 9 | - |”
“To assess the intrinsic propensity of each antibody to mediate amyloid removal the rate of amyloid removal per mg of antibody administered per unit time was calculated and then converted to a standard dose that can be related to clinical practice (10mg/kg Q4W).”
Figure legend calls phase II studies phase III trials
MinorThe legend says the plotted data come from four phase III trials, but the figure itself labels the donanemab and lecanemab studies as phase II.
“The decrease in amyloid load as measured by centiloids or estimated centiloids (~) over time (see box 2 for further explanation) is indicated for four phase III trials 71,84,115 .”
“Donanemab phase II: titration to 20 mg/kg, Q4W i.v.Aducanumab phase III: titration to 10 mg/kg, Q4W i.v.Lecanemab phase II: 10 mg/kg, Q2W i.v.”
Cites
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589 · see citing works
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Tau pathology is initiated well before amyloid pathology 18 in the medial temporal lobe, basal forebrain, brainstem, and olfactory areas (bulb and cortex) in a clinically benign manner sometimes called primary-age related tauopathy 19 , before spreading to limbic regions and finally the neocortex.”
Amyloid oligomers exacerbate tau pathology in a mouse model of tauopathy
Selenica, M.-L. B., Brownlow, M., Jimenez, J. P., Lee, D. C., Pena, G., Dickey, C. A., Gordon, M. N., & Morgan, D. (2013) · Neurodegenerative Diseases · doi:10.1159/000337230 · Cited by 10,359 · see citing works
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules
Morris, J. C. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a · Cited by 9,882 · see citing works
Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade
Jack, C. R., Knopman, D. S., Jagust, W. J., Shaw, L. M., Aisen, P. S., Weiner, M. W., Petersen, R. C., & Trojanowski, J. Q. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70299-6 · Cited by 4,806 · see citing works
Goate, A., Chartier-Harlin, M.-C., Mullan, M., Brown, J., Crawford, F., Fidani, L., Giuffra, L., Haynes, A., Irving, N., James, L., et al. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349704a0 · Cited by 4,659 · see citing works
A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease
(1984) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356 · Cited by 4,175 · see citing works
Cloning of a gene bearing missense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer's disease
Sherrington, R., Rogaev, E. I., Liang, Y., Rogaeva, E. A., Levesque, G., Ikeda, M., Chi, H., Lin, C., Li, G., Holman, K., et al. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/375754a0 · Cited by 4,051 · see citing works
Association of missense and 5′-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17
Hutton, M., Lendon, C. L., Rizzu, P., Baker, M., Froelich, S., Houlden, H., Pickering-Brown, S., Chakraverty, S., Isaacs, A., Grover, A., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31508 · Cited by 3,498 · see citing works
Phases of Aβ-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD
Thal, D. R., Rüb, U., Orantes, M., & Braak, H. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.58.12.1791 · Cited by 3,490 · see citing works
The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβ plaques in Alzheimer’s disease
Sevigny, J., Chiao, P., Bussière, T., Weinreb, P. H., Williams, L., Maier, M., Dunstan, R., Salloway, S., Chen, T., Ling, Y., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19323 · Cited by 3,059 · see citing works
Villemagne, V. L., Burnham, S., Bourgeat, P., Brown, B., Ellis, K. A., Salvado, O., Szoeke, C., Macaulay, S. L., Martins, R., Maruff, P., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70044-9 · Cited by 2,279 · see citing works
Stages of the Pathologic Process in Alzheimer Disease: Age Categories From 1 to 100 Years
Braak, H., Thal, D. R., Ghebremedhin, E., & Del Tredici, K. (2011) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e318232a379 · Cited by 2,194 · see citing works
Karran, E., Mercken, M., & Strooper, B. D. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3505 · Cited by 2,188 · see citing works
Self-citationRogaev, E. I., Sherrington, R., Rogaeva, E. A., Levesque, G., Ikeda, M., Liang, Y., Chi, H., Lin, C., Holman, K., Tsuda, T., et al. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376775a0 · Cited by 2,052 · see citing works
Bard, F., Cannon, C., Barbour, R., Burke, R.-L., Games, D., Grajeda, H., Guido, T., Hu, K., Huang, J., Johnson-Wood, K., et al. (2000) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/78682 · Cited by 2,012 · see citing works
The Cellular Phase of Alzheimer’s Disease
De Strooper, B., & Karran, E. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.056 · Cited by 1,990 · see citing works
Self-citationThe toxic Aβ oligomer and Alzheimer's disease: an emperor in need of clothes
Benilova, I., Karran, E., & De Strooper, B. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3028 · Cited by 1,962 · see citing works
Self-citationTwo Phase 3 Trials of Bapineuzumab in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Salloway, S., Sperling, R., Fox, N. C., Blennow, K., Klunk, W., Raskind, M., Sabbagh, M., Honig, L. S., Porsteinsson, A. P., Ferris, S., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1304839 · Cited by 1,960 · see citing works
A mutation in APP protects against Alzheimer’s disease and age-related cognitive decline
Jonsson, T., Atwal, J. K., Steinberg, S., Snaedal, J., Jonsson, P. V., Bjornsson, S., Stefansson, H., Sulem, P., Gudbjartsson, D., Maloney, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11283 · Cited by 1,738 · see citing works
Donanemab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease
Mintun, M. A., Lo, A. C., Duggan Evans, C., Wessels, A. M., Ardayfio, P. A., Andersen, S. W., Shcherbinin, S., Sparks, J., Sims, J. R., Brys, M., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2100708 · Cited by 1,728 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Donanemab met the primary outcome measure, although the clinical meaningfulness of the iADRS has not yet been established 84 .”
Phase 3 Trials of Solanezumab for Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Doody, R. S., Thomas, R. G., Farlow, M., Iwatsubo, T., Vellas, B., Joffe, S., Kieburtz, K., Raman, R., Sun, X., Aisen, P. S., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1312889 · Cited by 1,668 · see citing works
Prevalence of Cerebral Amyloid Pathology in Persons Without Dementia: A Meta-analysis
Jansen, W. J., Ossenkoppele, R., Knol, D. L., Tijms, B. M., Scheltens, P., Verhey, F. R. J., Visser, P. J., Aalten, P., Aarsland, D., Alcolea, D., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4668 · Cited by 1,610 · see citing works
Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging
Crary, J. F., Trojanowski, J. Q., Schneider, J. A., Abisambra, J. F., Abner, E. L., Alafuzoff, I., Arnold, S. E., Attems, J., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., et al. (2014) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0 · Cited by 1,467 · see citing works
The Centiloid Project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET
Klunk, W. E., Koeppe, R. A., Price, J. C., Benzinger, T. L., Devous, M. D., Jagust, W. J., Johnson, K. A., Mathis, C. A., Minhas, D., Pontecorvo, M. J., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.003 · Cited by 1,348 · see citing works
Synergy between amyloid-β and tau in Alzheimer’s disease
Busche, M. A., & Hyman, B. T. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0687-6 · Cited by 1,242 · see citing works
A Phase 3 Trial of Semagacestat for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease
Doody, R. S., Raman, R., Farlow, M., Iwatsubo, T., Vellas, B., Joffe, S., Kieburtz, K., He, F., Sun, X., Thomas, R. G., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1210951 · Cited by 1,224 · see citing works
The 'Arctic' APP mutation (E693G) causes Alzheimer's disease by enhanced Aβ protofibril formation
Nilsberth, C., Westlind-Danielsson, A., Eckman, C. B., Condron, M. M., Axelman, K., Forsell, C., Stenh, C., Luthman, J., Teplow, D. B., Younkin, S. G., et al. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0901-887 · Cited by 1,209 · see citing works
Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases
Hansson, O. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01382-x · Cited by 1,159 · see citing works
Trial of Solanezumab for Mild Dementia Due to Alzheimer’s Disease
Honig, L. S., Vellas, B., Woodward, M., Boada, M., Bullock, R., Borrie, M., Hager, K., Andreasen, N., Scarpini, E., Liu-Seifert, H., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1705971 · Cited by 1,049 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To summarize, anti-Aβ mAbs that predominantly bind to monomeric A β do not mediate substantial removal of plaque and lack clinical efficacy 42,43 .”
Bray, S. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.94 · Cited by 1,012 · see citing works
Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Wiste, H. J., Weigand, S. D., Therneau, T. M., Lowe, V. J., Knopman, D. S., Gunter, J. L., Senjem, M. L., Jones, D. T., Kantarci, K., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.005 · Cited by 931 · see citing works
Gélinas, I., Gauthier, L., McIntyre, M., & Gauthier, S. (1999) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.53.5.471 · Cited by 918 · see citing works
Antibody Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Lobo, E. D., Hansen, R. J., & Balthasar, J. P. (2004) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20178 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
Association of Amyloid and Tau With Cognition in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Longitudinal Study
Hanseeuw, B. J., Betensky, R. A., Jacobs, H. I. L., Schultz, A. P., Sepulcre, J., Becker, J. A., Cosio, D. M. O., Farrell, M., Quiroz, Y. T., Mormino, E. C., et al. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1424 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
The Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite: Measuring Amyloid-Related Decline
Donohue, M. C., Sperling, R. A., Salmon, D. P., Rentz, D. M., Raman, R., Thomas, R. G., Weiner, M., & Aisen, P. S. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.803 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
Sperling, R. A., Jack, C. R., Black, S. E., Frosch, M. P., Greenberg, S. M., Hyman, B. T., Scheltens, P., Carrillo, M. C., Thies, W., Bednar, M. M., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2351 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Clark, C. M., Pontecorvo, M. J., Beach, T. G., Bedell, B. J., Coleman, R. E., Doraiswamy, P. M., Fleisher, A. S., Reiman, E. M., Sabbagh, M. N., Sadowsky, C. H., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70142-4 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Swanson, C. J., Zhang, Y., Dhadda, S., Wang, J., Kaplow, J., Lai, R. Y. K., Lannfelt, L., Bradley, H., Rabe, M., Koyama, A., et al. (2021) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00813-8 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
The β-Secretase BACE1 in Alzheimer’s Disease
Hampel, H., Vassar, R., De Strooper, B., Hardy, J., Willem, M., Singh, N., Zhou, J., Yan, R., Vanmechelen, E., De Vos, A., et al. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.001 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Self-citationRandomized trial of verubecestat for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease
Egan, M. F., Kost, J., Tariot, P. N., Aisen, P. S., Cummings, J. L., Vellas, B., Sur, C., Mukai, Y., Voss, T., Furtek, C., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1706441 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Prevalence of Amyloid PET Positivity in Dementia Syndromes: A Meta-analysis
Ossenkoppele, R., Jansen, W. J., Rabinovici, G. D., Knol, D. L., van der Flier, W. M., van Berckel, B. N. M., Scheltens, P., Visser, P. J., Verfaillie, S. C. J., Zwan, M. D., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4669 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Tau PET imaging in neurodegenerative tauopathies—still a challenge
Leuzy, A., Chiotis, K., Lemoine, L., Gillberg, P.-G., Almkvist, O., Rodriguez-Vieitez, E., & Nordberg, A. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0342-8 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Niewoehner, J., Bohrmann, B., Collin, L., Urich, E., Sade, H., Maier, P., Rueger, P., Stracke, J. O., Lau, W., Tissot, A. C., et al. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.061 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
La Joie, R., Visani, A. V., Baker, S. L., Brown, J. A., Bourakova, V., Cha, J., Chaudhary, K., Edwards, L., Iaccarino, L., Janabi, M., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5732 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Imaging the evolution and pathophysiology of Alzheimer disease
Jagust, W. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0067-3 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Florbetaben PET imaging to detect amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer's disease: Phase 3 study
Sabri, O., Sabbagh, M. N., Seibyl, J., Barthel, H., Akatsu, H., Ouchi, Y., Senda, K., Murayama, S., Ishii, K., Takao, M., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.004 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Saido, T. C., Iwatsubo, T., Mann, D. M. A., Shimada, H., Ihara, Y., & Kawashima, S. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90301-1 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
A phase III randomized trial of gantenerumab in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease
for the SCarlet RoAD Investigators, Ostrowitzki, S., Lasser, R. A., Dorflinger, E., Scheltens, P., Barkhof, F., Nikolcheva, T., Ashford, E., Retout, S., Hofmann, C., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-017-0318-y · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Randomized trial of verubecestat for prodromal Alzheimer's disease
Egan, M. F., Kost, J., Voss, T., Mukai, Y., Aisen, P. S., Cummings, J. L., Tariot, P. N., Vellas, B., van Dyck, C. H., Boada, M., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1812840 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Knopman, D. S., Jones, D. T., & Greicius, M. D. (2021) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12213 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Ossenkoppele, R., Rabinovici, G. D., Smith, R., Cho, H., Schöll, M., Strandberg, O., Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Janelidze, S., Santillo, A., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12917 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Longitudinal tau PET in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease
Jack, C. R., Wiste, H. J., Schwarz, C. G., Lowe, V. J., Senjem, M. L., Vemuri, P., Weigand, S. D., Therneau, T. M., Knopman, D. S., Gunter, J. L., et al. (2018) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awy059 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Bohrmann, B., Baumann, K., Benz, J., Gerber, F., Huber, W., Knoflach, F., Messer, J., Oroszlan, K., Rauchenberger, R., Richter, W. F., et al. (2012) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-2011-110977 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
A Plaque-Specific Antibody Clears Existing β-amyloid Plaques in Alzheimer's Disease Mice
DeMattos, R. B., Lu, J., Tang, Y., Racke, M. M., DeLong, C. A., Tzaferis, J. A., Hole, J. T., Forster, B. M., McDonnell, P. C., Liu, F., et al. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition
Grothe, M. J., Barthel, H., Sepulcre, J., Dyrba, M., Sabri, O., Teipel, S. J., Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., Initiative, A. D. N., Weiner, M., Aisen, P., et al. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004643 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Imaging tau and amyloid-β proteinopathies in Alzheimer disease and other conditions
Villemagne, V. L., Doré, V., Burnham, S. C., Masters, C. L., & Rowe, C. C. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2018.9 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Mechanism of amyloid removal in patients with Alzheimer disease treated with gantenerumab
Ostrowitzki, S. (2012) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.1538 · Cited by 431 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this small exploratory study, there was evidence for the removal of amyloid compared to baseline (~20 CL) at the 200 mg dose 63 .”
Phase 3 solanezumab trials: Secondary outcomes in mild Alzheimer's disease patients
Siemers, E. R., Sundell, K. L., Carlson, C., Case, M., Sethuraman, G., Liu‐Seifert, H., Dowsett, S. A., Pontecorvo, M. J., Dean, R. A., & Demattos, R. (2016) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2015.06.1893 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Structural and kinetic basis for the selectivity of aducanumab for aggregated forms of amyloid-β
Arndt, J. W., Qian, F., Smith, B. A., Quan, C., Kilambi, K. P., Bush, M. W., Walz, T., Pepinsky, R. B., Bussière, T., Hamann, S., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24501-0 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Hypothesis: Tau pathology is an initiating factor in sporadic Alzheimer's disease
Arnsten, A. F. T., Datta, D., Del Tredici, K., & Braak, H. (2021) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12192 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
A trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease
Salloway, S., Farlow, M., McDade, E., Clifford, D. B., Wang, G., Llibre-Guerra, J. J., Hitchcock, J. M., Mills, S. L., Santacruz, A. M., Aschenbrenner, A. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01369-8 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Pontecorvo, M. J., Devous, M. D., Navitsky, M., Lu, M., Salloway, S., Schaerf, F. W., Jennings, D., Arora, A. K., McGeehan, A., Lim, N. C., et al. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww334 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Palmqvist, S., Insel, P. S., Stomrud, E., Janelidze, S., Zetterberg, H., Brix, B., Eichenlaub, U., Dage, J. L., Chai, X., Blennow, K., et al. (2019) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201911170 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Andrews, J. S., Desai, U., Kirson, N. Y., Zichlin, M. L., Ball, D. E., & Matthews, B. R. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2019.06.005 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Curtis, C., Gamez, J. E., Singh, U., Sadowsky, C. H., Villena, T., Sabbagh, M. N., Beach, T. G., Duara, R., Fleisher, A. S., Frey, K. A., et al. (2015) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4144 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
A γ‐secretase inhibitor decreases amyloid‐β production in the central nervous system
Bateman, R. J., Siemers, E. R., Mawuenyega, K. G., Wen, G., Browning, K. R., Sigurdson, W. C., Yarasheski, K. E., Friedrich, S. W., DeMattos, R. B., May, P. C., et al. (2009) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21623 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Racke, M. M., Boone, L. I., Hepburn, D. L., Parsadainian, M., Bryan, M. T., Ness, D. K., Piroozi, K. S., Jordan, W. H., Brown, D. D., Hoffman, W. P., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4337-04.2005 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
La Joie, R., Ayakta, N., Seeley, W. W., Borys, E., Boxer, A. L., DeCarli, C., Doré, V., Grinberg, L. T., Huang, E., Hwang, J., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.001 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Aducanumab: Appropriate Use Recommendations
Cummings, J., Aisen, P., Apostolova, L. G., Atri, A., Salloway, S., & Weiner, M. (2021) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.14283/jpad.2021.41 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
The Physiological Roles of Amyloid-β Peptide Hint at New Ways to Treat Alzheimer's Disease
Brothers, H. M., Gosztyla, M. L., & Robinson, S. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00118 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Bateman, R. J., Benzinger, T. L., Berry, S., Clifford, D. B., Duggan, C., Fagan, A. M., Fanning, K., Farlow, M. R., Hassenstab, J., McDade, E. M., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.005 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Maeda, J., Ji, B., Irie, T., Tomiyama, T., Maruyama, M., Okauchi, T., Staufenbiel, M., Iwata, N., Ono, M., Saido, T. C., et al. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0673-07.2007 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition
Grothe, M. J., Barthel, H., Sepulcre, J., Dyrba, M., Sabri, O., Teipel, S. J., Stern, Y., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2022) · DZNE Pub · doi:10.7916/0vj1-4c02 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Sensitive ELISA detection of amyloid‐β protofibrils in biological samples
Englund, H., Sehlin, D., Johansson, A., Nilsson, L. N. G., Gellerfors, P., Paulie, S., Lannfelt, L., & Pettersson, F. E. (2007) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04759.x · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Influence of tau PET, amyloid PET, and hippocampal volume on cognition in Alzheimer disease
Aschenbrenner, A. J., Gordon, B. A., Benzinger, T. L. S., Morris, J. C., & Hassenstab, J. J. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000006075 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Logovinsky, V., Satlin, A., Lai, R. Y. K., Swanson, C. J., Kaplow, J. M., Osswald, G., Basun, H., & Lannfelt, L. (2016) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-016-0181-2 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Safety and biomarker effects of solanezumab in patients with Alzheimer's disease
Farlow, M. R., Arnold, S. E., van Dyck, C. H., Aisen, P. S. S., Snider, B. J., Porsteinsson, A. P., Friedrich, S. W., Dean, R. A., Gonzales, C., Sethuraman, G., et al. (2012) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.09.224 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Lessons from a failed γ-secretase Alzheimer trial
De Strooper, B. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.016 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Karran, E. H., & Hardy, J. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24188 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Self-citationTau Mutations Cause Frontotemporal Dementias
Goedert, M., Crowther, R. A., & Spillantini, M. G. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80615-7 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Pontecorvo, M. J., Devous, M. D., Kennedy, I., Navitsky, M., Lu, M., Galante, N., Salloway, S., Doraiswamy, P. M., Southekal, S., Arora, A. K., et al. (2019) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awz090 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Approval of Aducanumab for Alzheimer Disease—The FDA’s Perspective
Dunn, B., Stein, P., & Cavazzoni, P. (2021) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4607 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Alexander, G. C., Emerson, S., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.3854 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Staging <b>β</b> -Amyloid Pathology With Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography
Mattsson, N., Palmqvist, S., Stomrud, E., Vogel, J., & Hansson, O. (2019) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2214 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Navitsky, M., Joshi, A. D., Kennedy, I., Klunk, W. E., Rowe, C. C., Wong, D. F., Pontecorvo, M. J., Mintun, M. A., & Devous, M. D. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.1353 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Aducanumab produced a clinically meaningful benefit in association with amyloid lowering
Cummings, J., Aisen, P., Lemere, C., Atri, A., Sabbagh, M., & Salloway, S. (2021) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00838-z · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Moving fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease from research tools to routine clinical diagnostics
Zetterberg, H., & Blennow, K. (2021) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-021-00430-x · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Klein, G., Delmar, P., Voyle, N., Rehal, S., Hofmann, C., Abi-Saab, D., Andjelkovic, M., Ristic, S., Wang, G., Bateman, R., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-019-0559-z · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Sanchez, J. S., Becker, J. A., Jacobs, H. I. L., Hanseeuw, B. J., Jiang, S., Schultz, A. P., Properzi, M. J., Katz, S. R., Beiser, A., Satizabal, C. L., et al. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abc0655 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Amadoru, S., Doré, V., McLean, C. A., Hinton, F., Shepherd, C. E., Halliday, G. M., Leyton, C. E., Yates, P. A., Hodges, J. R., Masters, C. L., et al. (2020) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-020-00587-5 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Kuo, Y.-M., Emmerling, M. R., Woods, A. S., Cotter, R. J., & Roher, A. E. (1997) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.1997.7083 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Hong, W., Wang, Z., Liu, W., O’Malley, T. T., Jin, M., Willem, M., Haass, C., Frosch, M. P., & Walsh, D. M. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1846-7 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Revisiting FDA Approval of Aducanumab
Alexander, G. C., Knopman, D. S., Emerson, S. S., Ovbiagele, B., Kryscio, R. J., Perlmutter, J. S., & Kesselheim, A. S. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2110468 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
ADCOMS: a composite clinical outcome for prodromal Alzheimer's disease trials
Wang, J., Logovinsky, V., Hendrix, S. B., Stanworth, S. H., Perdomo, C., Xu, L., Dhadda, S., Do, I., Rabe, M., Luthman, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-312383 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Amyloid β-protein and beyond: the path forward in Alzheimer’s disease
Walsh, D. M., & Selkoe, D. J. (2020) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2020.02.003 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Lord, A., Gumucio, A., Englund, H., Sehlin, D., Sundquist, V. S., Söderberg, L., Möller, C., Gellerfors, P., Lannfelt, L., Pettersson, F. E., et al. (2009) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2009.08.007 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Controversy and Progress in Alzheimer’s Disease — FDA Approval of Aducanumab
Rabinovici, G. D. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2111320 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Salloway, S., Honigberg, L. A., Cho, W., Ward, M. E., Friesenhahn, M. J., Brunstein, F., Quartino, A. L., Clayton, D., Mortensen, D. L., Bittner, T., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-018-0424-5 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Amyloid-β <sup>11</sup> C-PiB-PET imaging results from 2 randomized bapineuzumab phase 3 AD trials
Liu, E., Schmidt, M. E., Margolin, R., Sperling, R., Koeppe, R., Mason, N. S., Klunk, W. E., Mathis, C. A., Salloway, S., Fox, N. C., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001877 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Neuropathology after active Aβ42 immunotherapy: implications for Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis
Boche, D., Denham, N., Holmes, C., & Nicoll, J. A. R. (2010) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0719-5 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There does not appear to be a correlation between rate of amyloid removal and the incidence of ARIA-E, in contrast to what has previously been postulated 91 and as we will discuss below.”
Miles, L. A., Crespi, G. A. N., Doughty, L., & Parker, M. W. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01302 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Determining clinically meaningful decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease
Insel, P. S., Weiner, M., Mackin, R. S., Mormino, E., Lim, Y. Y., Stomrud, E., Palmqvist, S., Masters, C. L., Maruff, P. T., Hansson, O., et al. (2019) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000007831 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Structure of Crenezumab Complex with Aβ Shows Loss of β-Hairpin
Ultsch, M., Li, B., Maurer, T., Mathieu, M., Adolfsson, O., Muhs, A., Pfeifer, A., Pihlgren, M., Bainbridge, T. W., Reichelt, M., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39374 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Donanemab (LY3002813) dose‐escalation study in Alzheimer's disease
Lowe, S. L., Willis, B. A., Hawdon, A., Natanegara, F., Chua, L., Foster, J., Shcherbinin, S., Ardayfio, P. A., & Sims, J. R. (2021) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1002/trc2.12112 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Predicting future rates of tau accumulation on PET
Jack, C. R., Wiste, H. J., Weigand, S. D., Therneau, T. M., Lowe, V. J., Knopman, D. S., Botha, H., Graff-Radford, J., Jones, D. T., Ferman, T. J., et al. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa248 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease
Mattsson-Carlgren, N., Leuzy, A., Janelidze, S., Palmqvist, S., Stomrud, E., Strandberg, O., Smith, R., & Hansson, O. (2020) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000009485 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
The need to show minimum clinically important differences in Alzheimer's disease trials
Liu, K. Y., Schneider, L. S., & Howard, R. (2021) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00197-8 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Cross-sectional associations of tau-PET signal with cognition in cognitively unimpaired adults
Lowe, V. J., Bruinsma, T. J., Wiste, H. J., Min, H.-K., Weigand, S. D., Fang, P., Senjem, M. L., Therneau, T. M., Boeve, B. F., Josephs, K. A., et al. (2019) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000007728 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Weber, F. C., Bohrmann, B., Niewoehner, J., Fischer, J. A. A., Rueger, P., Tiefenthaler, G., Moelleken, J., Bujotzek, A., Brady, K., Singer, T., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.019 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Driscoll, I., Troncoso, J. C., Rudow, G., Sojkova, J., Pletnikova, O., Zhou, Y., Kraut, M. A., Ferrucci, L., Mathis, C. A., Klunk, W. E., et al. (2012) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-012-1025-1 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Progressive Tau Accumulation in Alzheimer Disease: 2-Year Follow-up Study
Cho, H., Choi, J. Y., Lee, H. S., Lee, J. H., Ryu, Y. H., Lee, M. S., Jack, C. R., & Lyoo, C. H. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.221697 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Doré, V., Bullich, S., Rowe, C. C., Bourgeat, P., Konate, S., Sabri, O., Stephens, A. W., Barthel, H., Fripp, J., Masters, C. L., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.02.005 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Yang, T., Dang, Y., Ostaszewski, B., Mengel, D., Steffen, V., Rabe, C., Bittner, T., Walsh, D. M., & Selkoe, D. J. (2019) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25513 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Lantos, P. L., Luthert, P. J., Hanger, D. P., Anderton, B. H., MULLAN, M. J., & Rossor, M. N. (1992) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(92)90408-y · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Satlin, A., Wang, J., Logovinsky, V., Berry, S. M., Swanson, C. J., Dhadda, S., & Berry, D. A. (2016) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2016.01.001 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Wessels, A. M., Siemers, E. R., Yu, P., Andersen, S. W., Holdridge, K. C., Sims, J. R., Sundell, K., Stern, Y., Rentz, D. M., Dubois, B., et al. (2015) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.14283/jpad.2015.82 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
The Relationship between Amyloid and Tau
Hardy, J. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.1385/jmn:20:2:203 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Qian, J., Betensky, R. A., Hyman, B. T., & Serrano-Pozo, A. (2021) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000011883 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Knopman, D. S., Lundt, E. S., Therneau, T. M., Albertson, S. M., Gunter, J. L., Senjem, M. L., Schwarz, C. G., Mielke, M. M., Machulda, M. M., Boeve, B. F., et al. (2021) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3921 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Wang, G., Berry, S. M., Xiong, C., Hassenstab, J. J., Quintana, M., McDade, E., Delmar, P., Vestrucci, M., Sethuraman, G., Bateman, R. J., et al. (2018) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7811 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Yoshida, K. J., Moein, A., Bittner, T., Ostrowitzki, S., Lin, H. H., Honigberg, L. A., Jin, J. Y., & Quartino, A. L. (2020) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-020-0580-2 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The Problem of Aducanumab for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease
Alexander, G. C., & Karlawish, J. (2021) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m21-2603 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Meilandt, W. J., Maloney, J. A., Imperio, J., Lalehzadeh, G., Earr, T., Crowell, S., Bainbridge, T. W., Lu, Y., Ernst, J. A., Fuji, R. N., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-019-0553-5 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Peripheral and central effects of γ-secretase inhibition by semagacestat in Alzheimer’s disease
Doody, R. S., Raman, R., Sperling, R. A., Seimers, E., Sethuraman, G., Mohs, R. C., Farlow, M. R., Iwatsubo, T., Vellas, B. J., Sun, X., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-015-0121-6 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
An Appropriate Use of Accelerated Approval — Aducanumab for Alzheimer’s Disease
Dunn, B., Stein, P., Temple, R., & Cavazzoni, P. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2111960 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Visualization of Brain Amyloid and Microglial Activation in Mouse Models of Alzheimers Disease
Higuchi, M. (2009) · Current Alzheimer Research · doi:10.2174/156720509787602906 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Aducanumab, Amyloid Lowering, and Slowing of Alzheimer Disease
Salloway, S., & Cummings, J. (2021) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000012451 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The Accelerated Approval of Aducanumab for Treatment of Patients With Alzheimer Disease
Steinbrook, R. (2021) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4622 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Irizarry, M. C., Sims, J. R., Lowe, S. L., Nakano, M. H., Hawdon, A., Willis, B. A., Gonzales, C., Liu, P., Fujimoto, S., Dean, R. A., et al. (2016) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.665 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Aisen, P. S. S., Zhou, J., Irizarry, M. C., Kramer, L. D., Swanson, C. J., Dhadda, S., Rabe, M. P., Krause, S., Li, D. J., Raman, R., et al. (2020) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.044511 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Hanger, D. P., Mann, D. M. A., Neary, D., & Anderton, B. H. (1992) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(92)90016-z · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Aducanumab: What about the Patient?
Petersen, R. C. (2021) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.26181 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Atomic-level differences between brain parenchymal- and cerebrovascular-seeded Aβ fibrils
Scherpelz, K. P., Wang, S., Pytel, P., Madhurapantula, R. S., Srivastava, A. K., Sachleben, J. R., Orgel, J., Ishii, Y., & Meredith, S. C. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80042-5 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Coevolution of Atomic Resolution and Whole-Brain Imaging for Tau Neurofibrillary Tangles
Dalton, R. M., Krishnan, H. S., Parker, V. S., Catanese, M. C., & Hooker, J. M. (2020) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00426 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Consequences of the FDA Decision on Aducanumab for Patient Care and Research
Doody, R. S. (2021) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.14283/jpad.2021.43 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Suzuki, K. et al. Effect of apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele on the progression of cognitive decline in the early stage of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 6, e12007 (2020).
- Reyderman, L. et al. BAN2401 and ARIA-E in early Alzheimer’s disease: pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic time-to-event analysis from the phase 2 study in early Alzheimer’s disease. J. Prev. Alzheimer’s Dis. 7, S17 (2020).
- Budd Haeberlein, S. et al. Evaluation of aducanumab efficacy in early Alzheimer’s disease. Presented at 15th International Conference on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases and related neurological disorders (2021).
- Clark, C. M. et al. Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-beta plaques: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 11, 669–678 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Xia, Y., Zhang, J., & Chen, L. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01911-3 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Alzheimer's disease: From immunotherapy to immunoprevention
Jucker, M., & Walker, L. C. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.021 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Microbiota from Alzheimer’s patients induce deficits in cognition and hippocampal neurogenesis
Grabrucker, S., Marizzoni, M., Silajdžić, E., Lopizzo, N., Mombelli, E., Nicolas, S., Dohm-Hansen, S., Scassellati, C., Moretti, D. V., Rosa, M., et al. (2023) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awad303 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Mouse Models of Alzheimer’s Disease
Yokoyama, M., Kobayashi, H., Tatsumi, L., & Tomita, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.912995 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Accelerating Alzheimer’s therapeutic development: The past and future of clinical trials
Boxer, A. L., & Sperling, R. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.09.023 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Haass, C., & Selkoe, D. (2022) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001694 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Stern, A. M., Yang, Y., Jin, S., Yamashita, K., Meunier, A. L., Liu, W., Cai, Y., Ericsson, M., Liu, L., Goedert, M., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.007 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Huang, Q., Jiang, C., Xia, X., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Wang, X., Lei, T., Yang, X., Yang, W., Cheng, G., et al. (2023) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.0180 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Shade, L. M. P., Katsumata, Y., Abner, E. L., Aung, K. Z., Claas, S. A., Qiao, Q., Heberle, B. A., Brandon, J. A., Page, M. L., Hohman, T. J., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01939-9 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Transferrin receptor-targeted anti-amyloid antibody enhances brain delivery and mitigates ARIA.
Pizzo, M. E., Plowey, E. D., Khoury, N., Kwan, W., Abettan, J., DeVos, S. L., Discenza, C. B., Earr, T., Joy, D., Lye-Barthel, M., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ads3204 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Therapeutics for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease
Thawabteh, A. M., Ghanem, A. W., AbuMadi, S., Thaher, D., Jaghama, W., Karaman, D., & Karaman, R. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29215131 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Enhancing neuroprotection is one of DMTs’ main objectives [74].”
BackgroundDe Strooper, B., & Karran, E. (2024) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/s44318-024-00057-w · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationPlasma ATN(I) classification and precision pharmacology in Alzheimer's disease
Imbimbo, B. P., Watling, M., Imbimbo, C., & Nisticò, R. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13084 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
He, S., Li, X., Mittra, N., Bhattacharjee, A., Wang, H., Song, S., Zhao, S., Liu, F., & Han, X. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202410910 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Abd El-Aziz, N. M. A., Shehata, M. G., Alsulami, T., Badr, A. N., Elbakatoshy, M. R., Ali, H. S., & El-Sohaimy, S. A. (2022) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph16010012 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Jeong, S. Y., Suh, C. H., Kim, S. J., Lemere, C. A., Lim, J.-S., & Lee, J.-H. (2024) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2024.0105 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Consequently, second-generation monoclonal antibodies demonstrate enhanced clinical efficacy and faster A β clearance than their first-generation counterparts [1].”
BackgroundZhao, M., Ma, G., Yan, X., Li, X., Wang, E., Xu, X.-X., Zhao, J.-B., Ma, X., & Zeng, J. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02428-5 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Chen, L., Christenson Wick, Z., Vetere, L. M., Vaughan, N., Jurkowski, A., Galas, A., Diego, K. S., Philipsberg, P. A., Soler, I., Feng, Y., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1204-23.2023 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Pathogenesis, Animal Models, and Drug Discovery of Alzheimer’s Disease
Xia, Z.-D., Ma, R.-X., Wen, J.-F., Zhai, Y.-F., Wang, Y.-Q., Wang, F.-Y., Liu, D., Zhao, X.-L., Sun, B., Jia, P., et al. (2023) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-230326 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Li, X., Chen, J., Yang, Y., Cai, H., Ao, Z., Xing, Y., Li, K., Yang, K., Guan, W., Friend, J., et al. (2025) · Microsystems & Nanoengineering · doi:10.1038/s41378-025-00916-4 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
HMGCS2-Induced Autophagic Degradation of Tau Involves Ketone Body and ANKRD24
Hu, L.-T., Xie, X.-Y., Zhou, G.-F., Wen, Q.-X., Song, L., Luo, B., Deng, X.-J., Pan, Q.-L., & Chen, G.-J. (2023) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-220640 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Mouillet-Richard, S., Martin-Lannerée, S., Le Corre, D., Hirsch, T. Z., Ghazi, A., Sroussi, M., Pilati, C., de Reyniès, A., Djouadi, F., Vodovar, N., et al. (2022) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-022-02430-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
NAD+ hydrolase Sarm1 is a key driver of synapse degeneration and memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease
Fan, F., Joshi, P., Liu, X., Kotturu, S. K., Abiola, M., Liu, Q., & Lou, X. (2025) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.21.695860
- Authors
- Karran, E., & De Strooper, B.
- Affiliations
- AbbVie (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karran, Eric
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
- Published
- 2022-02-17
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 306-318
- ISSN
- 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1784
- OpenAlex
- W4213065543
- Semantic Scholar
- acd28ae3f07e3ec0c7c1e82657181708655be0e2
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 124 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 203 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 62
- FWCI
- 21.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, amyloid hypothesis, amyloid-beta, anti-amyloid antibodies, aducanumab, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, surrogate endpoints, clinical trial failure, cognitive impairment, clinical benefit
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review