Cited by 124Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

SORL1 genetic variants and Alzheimer disease risk: a literature review and meta-analysis of sequencing data

Campion, Dominique, Charbonnier, Camille, Nicolas, Gaël·2019·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

Massive parallel sequencing recently allowed the identification of three genes carrying a higher burden of rare, protein-truncating and missense predicted damaging variants in Alzheimer disease (AD) cases as compared to controls: TREM2, SORL1, and ABCA7. SORL1 encodes SorLA, a key protein involved in the processing of the amyloid-beta (Aβ) precursor protein (APP) and the secretion of the Aβ peptide, the aggregation of which triggers AD pathophysiology. Common SORL1 single nucleotide polymorphisms had originally been associated with AD with modest odds ratios (ORs). The association of AD with rare SORL1 coding variants has been demonstrated at the gene level by aggregating protein-truncating (PTV) and rare predicted damaging missense variants. In addition to the loss of SorLA function induced by PTVs, a few missense variants were studied in vitro, showing diverse degrees of decreased SorLA function and leading to increased Aβ secretion. However, the exact functional consequences of most of the missense variants remain to be determined as well as corresponding levels of AD risk. Hereby we review the evidence of the association of SORL1 common and rare variants with AD risk and conduct a meta-analysis of published data on SORL1 rare variants in five large sequencing studies. We observe a significant enrichment in PTVs with ORs of 12.29 (95% confidence interval = [4.22-35.78]) among all AD cases and 27.50 [7.38-102.42] among early-onset cases. Rare [minor allele frequency (MAF) -…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00401-019-01991-4

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campion, D., Charbonnier, C., & Nicolas, G.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Campion, Dominique
  • Nicolas, Gaël
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
2019-03-25
Volume
138
Issue
2
Pages
173-186
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2941381527
Cited by
124
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DEQ20170336711)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
SORL1, SorLA, Alzheimer's disease, rare variants, truncating mutations, missense mutations, amyloid-beta secretion, amyloid precursor protein, early-onset Alzheimer's disease, genetic risk, fibronectin type III domain, TREM2, ABCA7
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Whole Genome Sequencing, Alzheimer Disease, Codon, Female, Gene Frequency, Genes, Dominant, Humans, Male, Pedigree, Risk, Case-Control Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mutation, Missense, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, LDL-Receptor Related Proteins, Membrane Transport Proteins, Apolipoprotein E4, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review