Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272Foot and Ankle SurgerySports injuries and preventionLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of acute ankle ligament injuries: a systematic review

Open access
Petersen, Wolf, Rembitzki, Ingo Volker, Koppenburg, Andreas Gösele, Ellermann, Andre, Liebau, Christian, Brüggemann, Gerd Peter, Best, Raymond·2013·Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lateral ankle sprains are common musculoskeletal injuries. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to perform a systematic literature review of the last 10 years regarding evidence for the treatment and prevention of lateral ankle sprains. DATA SOURCE: Pubmed central, Google scholar. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Meta-analysis, prospective randomized trials, English language articles. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical and non-surgical treatment, immobilization versus functional treatment, different external supports, balance training for rehabilitation, balance training for prevention, braces for prevention. METHODS: A systematic search for articles about the treatment of lateral ankle sprains that were published between January 2002 and December 2012. RESULTS: Three meta-analysis and 19 articles reporting 16 prospective randomized trials could be identified. The main advantage of surgical ankle ligament repair is that objective instability and recurrence rate is less common when compared with non-operative treatment. Balancing the advantages and disadvantages of surgical and non-surgical treatment, we conclude that the majority of grades I, II and III lateral ankle ligament ruptures can be managed without surgery. For non-surgical treatment, long-term immobilization should be avoided. For grade III injuries, however, a short period of immobilization (max. 10 days) in a below knee cast was shown to be advantageous. After this phase, the ankle is most effectively protected against inversion by a semi-rigid ankle brace. Even grades I and II injuries are most effectively treated with a semi-rigid ankle brace. There is evidence that treatment of acute ankle sprains should be supported by a neuromuscular training. Balance training is also effective for the prevention of ankle sprains in athletes with the previous sprains. There is good evidence from high level randomized trials in the literature that the use of a brace is effective for the prevention of ankle sprains. CONCLUSION: Balancing the advantages and disadvantages of surgical and non-surgical treatment, we conclude that the majority of grades I, II and III lateral ankle ligament ruptures can be managed without surgery. The indication for surgical repair should be always made on an individual basis. This systematic review supports a phase adapted non-surgical treatment of acute ankle sprains with a short-term immobilization for grade III injuries followed by a semi-rigid brace. More prospective randomized studies with a longer follow-up are needed to find out what type of non-surgical treatment has the lowest re-sprain rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00402-013-1742-5

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selecting articles to be included in the systematic review to answer our three questions. Article reference numbers are superscripted
Fig. 1 Flow chart for selecting articles to be included in the systematic review to answer our three questions. Article reference numbers are superscriptedCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

5 retracted

Show all 69 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Petersen, W., Rembitzki, I. V., Koppenburg, A. G., Ellermann, A., Liebau, C., Brüggemann, G. P., & Best, R.
Affiliations
Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Petersen, Wolf
  • Best, Raymond
Venue
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published
2013-05-28
Volume
133
Issue
8
Pages
1129-1141
ISSN
  • 0936-8051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-3916
OpenAlex
W2039059284
Cited by
272
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
lateral ankle sprain, ankle ligament injury, ankle sprain prevention, ankle brace, immobilization, conservative treatment, balance training, neuromuscular training, ankle instability, recurrence, athletes
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Humans, Prospective Studies, Sprains and Strains, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Ankle Injuries, Lateral Ligament, Ankle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.