Cited by 11Scoliosis diagnosis and treatmentConnective tissue disorders researchPectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment

Systematic review of the association between isolated musculoskeletal hypermobility and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Open access
Shere, Clare, Clark, Emma M.·2022·Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects 1–3% of the population, but its pathogenesis remains unclear. The coexistence of musculoskeletal hypermobility and scoliosis in many inherited syndromes raises the possibility that isolated musculoskeletal hypermobility may contribute to AIS development or progression. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the evidence for a relationship between isolated musculoskeletal hypermobility and AIS. A meta-analysis was planned, but if not possible, a narrative evidence synthesis was planned. Results: Nineteen studies met eligibility criteria for inclusion. One study was excluded due to insufficient quality. Substantial heterogeneity in study design and methodology negated meta-analysis, so a narrative review was performed. Of the 18 studies included, seven suggested a positive association and eight found no association. Three reported the prevalence of musculoskeletal hypermobility in individuals with AIS. Overall, there was no convincing population-based evidence for an association between musculoskeletal hypermobility and AIS, with only two case–control studies by the same authors presenting compelling evidence for an association. Although populations at extremes of hypermobility had a high prevalence of spinal curvature, these studies were at high risk of confounding. Wide variation in methods of measuring musculoskeletal hypermobility and the challenge of assessing AIS in population-based studies hinder study comparison. Conclusions: There is a paucity of high-quality evidence examining the association between isolated musculoskeletal hypermobility and AIS. Large-scale prospective studies with adequate adjustment for potential confounding factors could clarify the relationship between musculoskeletal hypermobility and AIS to elucidate its role in the pathogenesis of AIS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00402-022-04508-z

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent systematic review found no association between isolated musculoskeletal hypermobility and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and the "wide variation in methods of musculoskeletal hypermobility" made study comparisons difficult so it was somewhat inconclusive.

    “A recent systematic review found no association, the “wide variation in methods of musculoskeletal hypermobility” made study comparisons difficult so it was somewhat inconclusive.”

    From Pediatric joint hypermobility: a diagnostic framework and narrative review (2023) · cites this paper as [71]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Hasankhani EG Omidi-Kashani F Generalized ligamentous laxity; a parameter should not preoperative planning of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Iran Red Crescent Med J 2012 14 11 707 709 PMC3560538 23396267

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shere, C., & Clark, E. M.
Affiliations
Southmead Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Shere, Clare
Venue
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published
2022-07-16
Volume
143
Issue
6
Pages
3055-3076
ISSN
  • 0936-8051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-3916
OpenAlex
W4285587548
Cited by
11
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (204813/Z/16/Z)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, joint hypermobility, scoliosis pathogenesis, spinal curvature, confounding
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Humans, Prospective Studies, Scoliosis, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review