Cited by 51Reproductive tract infections researchProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGynecological conditions and treatments

The use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus in the therapy of bacterial vaginosis. Evaluation of clinical efficacy in a population of 40 women treated for 24 months

Rossi, Alessandro, Rossi, Thomas, Bertini, Marco, Caccia, Giorgio·2010·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract

Background Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most prevalent vaginal disorder in adult women worldwide. A number of clinical studies indicate that re-establishment of the physiological ecosystem by re-colonization of vaginal mucosa by lactobacilli may be an effective therapy for BV both after initial antimicrobial therapy or when given alone. A vaginal pH Objective The aims of this work were to assess the effectiveness of a long-term (24 months) intravaginal treatment with Lactobacillus rhamnosus (NORMOGIN) on the vaginal pH and on the clinical symptoms in a group of 40 women affected by BV diagnosed by the Amsel criteria. Method A prospective open clinical trial was performed in 40 consecutive cases evaluated for B.V. by the Amsel criteria. Results Vaginal pH was above the physiological value of 4.5 in 36 out of 40 patients at the first visit. It returned under 4.5 value in 24/40 and 32/40 women after 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. pH values were significantly decreased at 12 month treatment (P Conclusions The present study supports the use of pH measurement for sensitive, objective, and simple therapy follow-up in women with BV and shows that long-term administration of vaginal tablets containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus represents an effective and safe treatment for restoring the physiological vaginal pH and controlling BV symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00404-009-1287-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rossi, A., Rossi, T., Bertini, M., & Caccia, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Insubria (IT)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (CH)
Corresponding author
Rossi, Alessandro
Venue
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2009-12-12
Volume
281
Issue
6
Pages
1065-1069
ISSN
  • 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0067
  • 1432-0711
OpenAlex
W2057382211
Cited by
51
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 14 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
bacterial vaginosis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, vaginal pH, vaginal microbiota, vaginal lactobacilli, Amsel criteria, long-term treatment, symptom scores
MeSH terms
Administration, Intravaginal, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Vaginosis, Bacterial, Treatment Outcome, Probiotics, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review