Decreased Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) and increased Natural Killer (NK) cells in peripheral blood as possible early markers of preeclampsia: a case-control analysis
Abstract
Purpose Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) and Natural Killer (NK) cells were recently advocates in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia (PE), since they can be mobilized into the bloodstream and may orchestrate vascular endothelium function. The aim of our study was to evaluate in early pregnancy circulating EPCs and NK cells in peripheral blood in women who later developed PE compared to uncomplicated pregnancies.Methods We prospectively enrolled pregnant women at 9+0-11+6 weeks of gestation at the time of first-trimester integrated screening for trisomy 21, who underwent peripheral venous blood (20 mL) sample. We included only women who later developed PE (cases) and women with uncomplicated pregnancy (controls), matched for maternal age, parity, and Body Mass Index. In these groups, we evaluated the levels of CD16+CD45+CD56+ NK cells and CD34+CD133+VEGF-R2+ EPCs in peripheral blood samples previously stored.Results EPCs were significantly lower (p < 0.001), whereas NK cells were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in PE group compared to uncomplicated pregnancies during the first trimester.Conclusion The evaluation of EPCs and NK cells in peripheral blood during the first trimester may be considered an effective screening for the early identification of women at risk of developing PE.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An association has been found between certain maternal bloodstream biomarkers and the development of preeclampsia, impaired fetal growth, and stillbirth.
“Biomarkers in the maternal bloodstream have been investigated extensively and an association has been found between certain biomarkers and the development of preeclampsia, impaired fetal growth and stillbirth16–18.”
From Multi-centre deep learning for placenta segmentation in obstetric ultrasound with multi-observer and cross-country generalization (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Laganà, A. S., Giordano, D., Loddo, S., Zoccali, G., Vitale, S. G., Santamaria, A., Buemi, M., & D’Anna, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Messina (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Laganà, Antonio Simone
- ORCID
- Venue
- Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- Published
- 2017-02-28
- Volume
- 295
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 867-872
- ISSN
- 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
- 0932-0067
- 1432-0711
- OpenAlex
- W2594416256
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
- Keywords
- preeclampsia, endothelial progenitor cells, natural killer cells, first trimester, peripheral blood biomarkers, early screening, CD16+CD56+ NK cells, vascular endothelium, pregnancy complications
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Humans, Killer Cells, Natural, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Endothelial Progenitor Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review