Cited by 71Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive System and PregnancyNeurological Complications and Syndromes

Decreased Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) and increased Natural Killer (NK) cells in peripheral blood as possible early markers of preeclampsia: a case-control analysis

Laganà, Antonio Simone, Giordano, Domenico, Loddo, Saverio, Zoccali, Giuseppe, Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni, Santamaria, Angelo, Buemi, Michele, D’Anna, Rosario·2017·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract

Purpose Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) and Natural Killer (NK) cells were recently advocates in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia (PE), since they can be mobilized into the bloodstream and may orchestrate vascular endothelium function. The aim of our study was to evaluate in early pregnancy circulating EPCs and NK cells in peripheral blood in women who later developed PE compared to uncomplicated pregnancies.Methods We prospectively enrolled pregnant women at 9+0-11+6 weeks of gestation at the time of first-trimester integrated screening for trisomy 21, who underwent peripheral venous blood (20 mL) sample. We included only women who later developed PE (cases) and women with uncomplicated pregnancy (controls), matched for maternal age, parity, and Body Mass Index. In these groups, we evaluated the levels of CD16+CD45+CD56+ NK cells and CD34+CD133+VEGF-R2+ EPCs in peripheral blood samples previously stored.Results EPCs were significantly lower (p < 0.001), whereas NK cells were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in PE group compared to uncomplicated pregnancies during the first trimester.Conclusion The evaluation of EPCs and NK cells in peripheral blood during the first trimester may be considered an effective screening for the early identification of women at risk of developing PE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00404-017-4296-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 71

Authors
Laganà, A. S., Giordano, D., Loddo, S., Zoccali, G., Vitale, S. G., Santamaria, A., Buemi, M., & D’Anna, R.
Affiliations
University of Messina (IT)
Corresponding author
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Venue
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
295
Issue
4
Pages
867-872
ISSN
  • 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0067
  • 1432-0711
OpenAlex
W2594416256
Cited by
71
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
Keywords
preeclampsia, endothelial progenitor cells, natural killer cells, first trimester, peripheral blood biomarkers, early screening, CD16+CD56+ NK cells, vascular endothelium, pregnancy complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Humans, Killer Cells, Natural, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Endothelial Progenitor Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review