Cited by 17Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisReproductive Health and Contraception

Early and late pregnancy outcomes in women treated with cold-coagulation versus LLETZ cervical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; a retrospective cohort study

Papoutsis, Dimitrios, Underwood, Martyn, Parry-Smith, William, Panikkar, Jane·2018·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract

Purpose To compare the pregnancy outcomes between women who were treated with cold-coagulation versus large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had a single cervical treatment between 2010 and 2011. We identified those women who had a singleton pregnancy subsequent to their cervical treatment until September 2017. Women with previous cervical treatment, previous miscarriage or preterm delivery were excluded. Results We identified 86 women with a pregnancy after LLETZ treatment and 75 women after cold coagulation. Those who had LLETZ when compared to cold coagulation miscarried more often in the first trimester (33.7 vs 17.3%; p = 0.01) than in the second trimester. In women with LLETZ this effect of increased early miscarriage was shown to be prolonged and to persist up to 17 months after excision. Women with LLETZ when compared to cold coagulation had higher spontaneous preterm birth rates (8.9 vs 6.7%) even though the difference was non significant, with the earliest spontaneous preterm birth occurring at 32 weeks and 34 weeks, respectively. Conclusion We found that women who received LLETZ treatment when compared to cold coagulation had higher spontaneous preterm birth rates in their subsequent pregnancy and miscarried more frequently in the first trimester, and demonstrated an increased early miscarriage risk that persisted for more than a year after excisional…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00404-018-4704-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study in the United Kingdom observed a higher overall rate of miscarriages in women treated by thermal ablation than in untreated women, but the analysis was not adjusted for potential confounders.

    “Similar to our findings, a study led in the United Kingdom [27] observed a higher overall rate of miscarriages in women treated by TA than in untreated women, but the analysis was not adjusted for potential confounders.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papoutsis, D., Underwood, M., Parry-Smith, W., & Panikkar, J.
Affiliations
Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Papoutsis, Dimitrios
Venue
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2018-02-05
Volume
297
Issue
4
Pages
1015-1025
ISSN
  • 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0067
  • 1432-0711
OpenAlex
W2786426831
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, cold coagulation, LLETZ, pregnancy outcomes, miscarriage, preterm birth, first-trimester miscarriage, cervical cancer treatment
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Trachelectomy, Adult, Biopsy, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Colposcopy, Diathermy, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review