Cited by 27Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The participation rate of migrant women in gestational diabetes screening in Austria: A retrospective analysis of 3293 births

Open access
Weiss, Christoph, Oppelt, Peter, Mayer, Richard Bernhard·2019·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the extent to which migrant women participate in the mandatory oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening in Austria. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was carried out of births at an obstetrics unit in a university hospital between January 2013 and December 2015. The inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies, live births, birth weight ≥ 3500, and no preexisting diabetes mellitus. The patient's extramurally obtained OGTT values and history of GDM were checked. If the mother's country of birth was not Austria, the woman was classified as a migrant. Three groups were defined: group 1-women with normal OGTT; group 2-women with pathological OGTT; and group 3-women without OGTT or with an incomplete OGTT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of complete and incomplete OGTTs and rate of women with pathological OGTTs not treated in accordance with the guidelines among mothers born in Austria or migrants. The groups were compared using the t-test, chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 3293 births met the inclusion criteria, and 43.52% of all mothers were migrants; 16.8% of all women had pathological OGTT findings. Only 60.1% of the latter received treatment in accordance with the guidelines. The proportion of mothers born in Austria who did not have OGTTs, or only incomplete ones, was 5.4%. In the group of migrant women, the corresponding figure was 10.5% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Migrant women have significantly lower rates of participation in GDM screening.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00404-018-4964-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]Gagnon AJ Zimbeck M Zeitlin J Migration to Western industrialised countries and perinatal health: a systematic review Soc Sci Med 2009 69 934 946 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.027 19664869 · DOI
  2. [2]Nielsen SS Krasnik A Poorer self-perceived health among migrants and ethnic minorities versus the majority population in Europe: a systematic review Int J Public Health 2010 55 357 371 10.1007/s00038-010-0145-4 20437193 · DOI
  3. [3]Naimy Z Grytten J Monkerud L Eskild A Perinatal mortality in non-Western migrants in Norway as compared to their countries of birth and to Norwegian women BMC Public Health 2013 13 37 10.1186/1471-2458-13-37 23320559 PMC3599470 · DOI
  4. [4]HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP et al (2008) Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 358:1991–2002. 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943 18463375 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Rayanagoudar G Hashi AA Zamora J Khan KS Hitman GA Thangaratinam S Quantification of the type 2 diabetes risk in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 95,750 women Diabetologia 2016 59 1403 1411 10.1007/s00125-016-3927-2 27073002 PMC4901120 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Hunger-Dathe W Mosebach N Sämann A Wolf G Müller UA Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance 6 years after gestational diabetes Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2006 114 11 17 10.1055/s-2005-873015 16450311 · DOI
  7. [8]Kautzky-Willer A Bancher-Todesca D Weitgasser R The impact of risk factors and more stringent diagnostic criteria of gestational diabetes on outcomes in central European women J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008 93 1689 1695 10.1210/jc.2007-2301 18285407 · DOI
  8. [9]Buckley BS, Harreiter J, Damm P, Corcoy R, Chico A, Simmons D, Vellinga A, Dunne F, DALI Core Investigator Group Gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: prevalence, current screening practice and barriers to screening A review Diabet Med 2012 29 844 854 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03541.x 22150506 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [11]Ferrara A Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: a public health perspective Diabetes Care 2007 30 S141 S146 10.2337/dc07-s206 17596462 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [12]Falavigna M Schmidt MI Trujillo J Alves LF Wendland ER Torloni MR Colagiuri S Duncan BB Effectiveness of gestational diabetes treatment: a systematic review with quality of evidence assessment Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012 98 396 405 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.002 23031412 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [14]Gagnon AJ McDermott S Rigol-Chachamovich J Bandyopadhyay M Stray-Pedersen B Stewart D Collaboration ROAM International migration and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2011 25 575 592 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01230.x 21980947 · DOI
  12. [15]Vangen S Stoltenberg C Holan S Moe N Magnus P Harris JR Stray-Pedersen B Outcome of pregnancy among immigrant women with diabetes Diabetes Care 2003 26 327 332 10.2337/diacare.26.2.327 12547857 · DOI
  13. [16]Reeske A Zeeb H Razum O Spallek J Differences in the incidence of gestational diabetes between women of Turkish and German origin: an analysis of health insurance data from a statutory health insurance in Berlin, Germany (AOK), 2005–2007 Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2012 72 305 310 10.1055/s-0031-1280428 25284836 PMC4168342 · DOI
  14. [17]World Health Organization (2013) Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/diabetes/publications/Hyperglycaemia_In_Pregnancy/en/. Accessed 4 Jan 2018 24199271
  15. [18]International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG et al (2010) International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 33:676–682. 10.2337/dc09-1848 PMC2827530 20190296 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [19]Kautzky-Willer A Bancher-Todesca D Pollak A Repa A Lechleitner M Weitgasser R Leitlinie für die Praxis. Gestationsdiabetes (GDM) Wien Klin Wochenschr 2012 124 58 65 10.1007/s00508-012-0265-3 23250453 · DOI
  17. [20]Kc K Shakya S Zhang H Gestational diabetes mellitus and macrosomia: a literature review Ann Nutr Metab 2015 66 Suppl 2 14 20 10.1159/000371628 26045324 · DOI
  18. [21]Zhang X Decker A Platt RW Kramer MS How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 198 517.e1 526 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.005 18455528 · DOI
  19. [24]Pottie K Greenaway C Feightner J Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees CMAJ Can Med Assoc J 2011 183 E824 E925 10.1503/cmaj.090313 20530168 PMC3168666 · DOI
  20. [25]Andersson S Karlsson V Bennet L Fellbrant K Hellgren M Attitudes regarding participation in a diabetes screening test among an Assyrian immigrant population in Sweden Nurs Res Pract 2016 2016 1504530 28083149 PMC5204114
  21. [26]Oza-Frank R Postpartum diabetes testing among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus: PRAMS 2009–2010 Matern Child Health J 2014 18 729 736 10.1007/s10995-013-1299-5 23775251 · DOI
  22. [27]Krendl E Mustafa ME Oral glucose tolerance test within the scope of prenatal care: evaluation 2010–2012 LaboratoriumsMedizin 2014 38 101 104 10.1515/labmed-2013-0063 · DOI
  23. [28]Khan S Yao Z Shah BR Gestational diabetes care and outcomes for refugee women: a population-based cohort study Diabet Med 2017 34 1608 1614 10.1111/dme.13440 28779484 · DOI
  24. [30]Tammaa A Teich G Scholl T Salzer H Ethnologie als Risikofaktor für Gestationsdiabetes in Mitteleuropa Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2001 61 142 146 10.1055/s-2001-11907 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, C., Oppelt, P., & Mayer, R. B.
Affiliations
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Corresponding author
Weiss, Christoph
Venue
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2018-11-21
Volume
299
Issue
2
Pages
345-351
ISSN
  • 0003-9128 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0067
  • 1432-0711
OpenAlex
W2901351024
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University Library Linz repository (Johannes Kepler Universitat Linz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, oral glucose tolerance test, gestational diabetes screening, migrant women, screening uptake, guideline adherence, prenatal care
MeSH terms
Adult, Austria, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Patient Participation, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Transients and Migrants, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review