Cited by 59Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

First-night-effect on polysomnographic respiratory sleep parameters in patients with sleep-disordered breathing and upper airway pathology

Gouveris, Haralampos, Selivanova, Oxana, Bausmer, Uta, Goepel, Bjoern, Mann, Wolf·2010·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract

The objective of this study is to test whether there is a difference between the polysomnographic (PSG) values of Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), minimal oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and arousal index recorded on two consecutive nights (so-called "first night effect") in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and concomitant upper airway pathology. Retrospective case-control study of polysomnographical recordings of 130 patients (112 males, 18 females, age range 23-80 years) with SDB and upper airway pathology who were tested on two consecutive nights in a hospital sleep laboratory was conducted. Only patients with upper airway pathology without other medical conditions causing SDB were included. AHI, minimal SpO(2), ODI and arousal index values of the first night were compared to those of the second night using Wilcoxon's test. There were no significant statistical differences between AHI, SpO(2), ODI and arousal index values (P = 0.130, P = 0.640, P = 0.052, and P = 0.692, respectively) between the two nights. However, 15% of the patients showed significant variability in the AHI between the two recordings and in 6% of the patients, a diagnosis of severe OSA (AHI > 10/h) would have been missed if only one night of sleep study had been performed. In general, one night of sleep study is sufficient to lead to a clear diagnosis of severe OSA in patients with sleep-disordered breathing and upper airway pathology but may still not diagnose 6% of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00405-010-1205-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gouveris, H., Selivanova, O., Bausmer, U., Goepel, B., & Mann, W.
Affiliations
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Gouveris, Haralampos
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2010-02-02
Volume
267
Issue
9
Pages
1449-1453
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
OpenAlex
W2015834332
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
first-night effect, sleep-disordered breathing, obstructive sleep apnea, apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, arousal index, oxygen saturation, polysomnography, night-to-night variability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Airway Obstruction, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Polysomnography, Statistics, Nonparametric, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review