Cited by 29Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Repeatability of sites of sleep-induced upper airway obstruction. A 2-night study based on recordings of airway pressure and flow

Rollheim, Jan, Tvinnereim, Magne, Sitek, Jan, Osnes, Terje·2001·European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate repeatability of overnight continuous airway pressure and flow recordings for assessment of obstructive sites and their distribution in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Study design Open, prospective study of 30 men with sleep-induced obstructive events (apnea and hypopnea). Methods Repeated ambulatory sleep recordings of airway pressure and flow to assess the localization of sites of obstructive events were compared. Obstructive sites were divided into upper (transpalatal) or lower (subpalatal). The exact distribution of obstructive sites was expressed as percentage upper obstructive events. A cut-off at apnea index (AI) = 5 was used for comparison between frequent and infrequent obstructers. Results Eighty-two percent (14/17) of patients with frequent, and 58% of those with infrequent apneic events maintained their predominant site of obstructive events classified as upper (transpalatal) or lower (subpalatal) [72% (21/29) in the entire group]. We found a significant correlation between recordings for the percentage upper apneic (R = 0.54, P = 0.024, n = 17) and hypopneic (R = 0.59, P = 0.012, n = 17) events in patients with frequent, but not in those with infrequent apneic events. Patients who had the vast majority of obstructive events located at a single site were more stable than those with more evenly distributed obstructive events. Conclusion Repeatability of sites of obstructive events is influenced by the severity of illness and the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004050100330

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rollheim, J., Tvinnereim, M., Sitek, J., & Osnes, T.
Affiliations
Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
Venue
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
258
Issue
5
Pages
259-264
ISSN
  • 0937-4477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-4726
OpenAlex
W2072718982
Cited by
29
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, upper airway obstruction, apnea index, hypopnea, repeatability
MeSH terms
Adult, Airway Obstruction, Airway Resistance, Catheterization, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Respiratory System, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Time Factors, Transducers, Pressure, Reproducibility of Results, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review