Cited by 29Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Comparison of garnet-biotite, calcite-graphite, and calcite-dolomite thermometry in the Grenville Orogen; Ontario, Canada

Rathmell, Mark A., Streepey, Margaret M., Essene, Eric J., van der Pluijm, Ben A.·1999·Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004100050480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 29

Authors
Rathmell, M. A., Streepey, M. M., Essene, E. J., & van der Pluijm, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
Published
1999-02
Volume
134
Issue
2-3
Pages
217-231
ISSN
  • 0010-7999 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0967
OpenAlex
W2169035735
Cited by
29
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
garnet-biotite thermometry, Grenville orogen, regional metamorphism, peak metamorphic temperature, isograds, retrogression, metapelites, Madoc, Bancroft

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review