Cited by 104Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetryImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction

Elliptical Fourier analysis: fundamentals, applications, and value for forensic anthropology

Caple, Jodi, Byrd, John, Stephan, Carl N.·2017·International Journal of Legal Medicine

Abstract

The numerical description of skeletal morphology enables forensic anthropologists to conduct objective, reproducible, and structured tests, with the added capability of verifying morphoscopic-based analyses. One technique that permits comprehensive quantification of outline shape is elliptical Fourier analysis. This curve fitting technique allows a form's outline to be approximated via the sum of multiple sine and cosine waves, permitting the profile perimeter of an object to be described in a dense (continuous) manner at a user-defined level of precision. A large amount of shape information (the entire perimeter) can thereby be collected in contrast to other methods relying on sparsely located landmarks where information falling in between the landmarks fails to be acquired. First published in 1982, elliptical Fourier analysis employment in forensic anthropology from 2000 onwards reflects a slow uptake despite large computing power that makes its calculations easy to conduct. Without hurdles arising from calculation speed or quantity, the slow uptake may partly reside with the underlying mathematics that on first glance is extensive and potentially intimidating. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by pictorially illustrating how elliptical Fourier harmonics work in a simple step-by-step visual fashion to facilitate universal understanding and as geared towards increased use in forensic anthropology. We additionally provide a short review of the method's utility for osteology, a summary of past uses in forensic anthropology, and software options for calculations that largely save the user the trouble of coding customized routines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00414-017-1555-0

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caple, J., Byrd, J., & Stephan, C. N.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Caple, Jodi
Venue
International Journal of Legal Medicine
Published
2017-02-17
Volume
131
Issue
6
Pages
1675-1690
ISSN
  • 0044-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 0937-9827
  • 1437-1596
OpenAlex
W2588675660
Cited by
104
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
10.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Legal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Keywords
elliptic Fourier analysis, skeletal morphology, curve fitting, Fourier harmonics, osteology, forensic anthropology, statistical shape analysis, software tools
MeSH terms
Bone and Bones, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Software, Forensic Anthropology, Anatomic Landmarks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review