Cited by 382Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesDysphagia Assessment and Management

Falls in frequent neurological diseases

Stolze, Henning, Klebe, Stephan, Zechlin, Christiane, Baecker, Christoph, Friege, Lars, Deuschl, G�nther·2004·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

The prevalence of falls among neurological patients is unknown, although disturbances of gait and posture are common. Falls may lead to burdens for the patient, the caregivers and the health system. We designed a prospective study and investigated all patients for a history of falls admitted to a neurological hospital during a 100-day period. Clinical investigation was carried out and several disease specific rating scales were applied. A total of 548 patients were investigated. Of all patients 34% had fallen once or more often during the last twelve months. A disturbance of gait was blamed for the fall in 55%, epileptic seizures in 12%, syncope in 10 % and stroke in 7%. Intrinsic risk factors for falls were high age, disturbed gait, poor balance and a fear of falling. As extrinsic factors we identified the treatment with antidepressants, neuroleptics and different cardiovascular medications, adverse environmental factors in the patients' home and the use of walking aids. Within the diagnoses, falls were most frequent in Parkinson's disease (62 %), syncope (57%) and polyneuropathy (48 %). According to these findings falls in neurological in-patients are twice as frequent as in an age-matched population living in the community. Falls in neurological patients are particularly linked to medication and disorders affecting gait and balance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-004-0276-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Falls occurred in 62% of patients with Parkinson's disease.

    “Another study reported falls in 62% of patients with PD (Stolze et al. 2004).”

    From The clinical symptoms of Parkinson's disease. (2016) · cites this paper as Stolze et al. 2004

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 382

Authors
Stolze, H., Klebe, S., Zechlin, C., Baecker, C., Friege, L., & Deuschl, G.
Affiliations
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
Corresponding author
Deuschl, G�nther
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
251
Issue
1
Pages
79-84
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W1770375643
Cited by
382
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
FWCI
35.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
falls, neurological disorders, gait disturbance, balance disorders, Parkinson's disease, syncope, polyneuropathy, epilepsy, stroke, fall risk factors, adverse drug reactions, antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs, cardiovascular drugs, fear of falling, walking aids, hospitalized patients
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Adult, Aged, Environment, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Syncope, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Risk Assessment, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review