Cited by 73Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Update on laser-evoked potential findings in fibromyalgia patients in light of clinical and skin biopsy features

de Tommaso, Marina, Nolano, Maria, Iannone, Florenzo, Vecchio, Eleonora, Ricci, Katia, Lorenzo, Marta, Delussi, Marianna, Girolamo, Francesco +5 more·2014·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

In fibromyalgia (FM), reduced habituation of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) suggests a dysfunction of pain processing at a central level. In this study, we aimed to further examine the nociceptive pathways at the peripheral to the central level in a large group of FM patients by means of LEPs and skin biopsy, in light of healthy controls findings and main clinical features. One hundred and ninety-nine FM patients and 109 age- and sex-matched controls were submitted to LEPs by the dorsum of the right hand and the skin over the right chest and knee tender point stimulation. Skin biopsy was performed in 21 randomly selected FM patients and 60 age- and sex-matched controls. The mean N2-P2 amplitude was reduced in the whole FM group, with normal or even increased values in patients with migraine as comorbidity and reduced values in other patients including those presenting with distal sensory deficits. All patients had reduced N2-P2 habituation in respect to controls. In the FM group, LEPs habituation was correlated with pain at tender points and bad quality of life. Epidermal fiber density was significantly reduced in FM patients versus controls, and correlated with N2-P2 amplitude by the hand and chest tender-point stimulation. Dysfunction in the nociceptive system at both the central and peripheral levels may concur to explain phenotypical eterogeneity and clinical symptom complexity in fibromyalgia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00415-013-7211-9

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The exact impact of the peripheral nervous system on pain in fibromyalgia syndrome is still a matter of debate.

    “however, the exact impact of the peripheral nervous system on pain in FMS is still a matter of debate.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Tommaso, M., Nolano, M., Iannone, F., Vecchio, E., Ricci, K., Lorenzo, M., Delussi, M., Girolamo, F., Lavolpe, V., Provitera, V., Stancanelli, A., Lapadula, G., & Livrea, P.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IT)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2013-12-24
Volume
261
Issue
3
Pages
461-472
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2032019145
Cited by
73
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
fibromyalgia, laser-evoked potentials, habituation, central sensitization, nociceptive pathways, skin biopsy, epidermal nerve fiber density, tender points, migraine comorbidity, sensory impairment, quality of life, phenotypic heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Adult, Biopsy, Brain, Electroencephalography, Electrooculography, Epidermis, Female, Fibromyalgia, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Migraine Disorders, Neural Conduction, Pain, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Random Allocation, Comorbidity, Laser-Evoked Potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review