Cited by 36Retinal Development and DisordersLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Cone-rod dystrophy can be a manifestation of Danon disease

Open access
Thiadens, Alberta A. H. J., Slingerland, Niki W. R., Florijn, Ralph J., Visser, Gerhard H., Riemslag, Frans C., Klaver, Caroline C. W.·2012·Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Danon disease is a neuromuscular disorder with variable expression in the eye. We describe a family with Danon disease and cone-rod dystrophy (CRD). METHODS: Affected males of one family with Danon were invited for an extensive ophthalmologic examination, including color vision testing, fundus photography, Goldmann perimetry, full-field electroretinogram (ERG), and SD-OCT. Previous ophthalmologic data were retrieved from medical charts. The LAMP2 and RPGR gene were analyzed by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Two siblings had no ocular phenotype. The third sibling and a cousin developed CRD leading to legal blindness. Visual acuity deteriorated progressively over time, color vision was severely disturbed, and ERG showed reduced photopic and scotopic responses. SD-OCT revealed thinning of the photoreceptor and RPE layer. Visual fields demonstrated central scotoma. The causal mutation was p.Gly384Arg in LAMP2; no mutations were found in RPGR. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first description of CRD in Danon disease. The retinal phenotype was a late onset but severe dystrophy characterized by loss of photoreceptors and RPE cells. With this report, we highlight the importance of a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination in the clinical work-up of Danon disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00417-011-1857-8

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternative splicing of LAMP2 results in three isoforms, LAMP2a, LAMP2b, and LAMP2c; patients with mutant LAMP2b and LAMP2c have milder phenotypes, whereas those with LAMP2a present with severe disease.

    “Alternative splicing of LAMP2 results in three isoforms, LAMP2a, LAMP2b, and LAMP2c. Patients with mutant LAMP2b and LAMP2c have milder phenotypes, whereas those with LAMP2a present with severe disease (Thiadens et al., 2012).”

    From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Thiadens et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thiadens, A. A. H. J., Slingerland, N. W. R., Florijn, R. J., Visser, G. H., Riemslag, F. C., & Klaver, C. C. W.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
  • Rotterdam Eye Hospital (NL)
Corresponding author
Thiadens, Alberta A. H. J.
Venue
Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Published
2012-01-31
Volume
250
Issue
5
Pages
769-774
ISSN
  • 0721-832X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-702X
OpenAlex
W2015118411
Cited by
36
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging ter voorkoming van Blindheid
  • Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden
  • Stichting Nederlands Oogheelkundig Onderzoek
  • Stichting Blinden-Penning
  • Stichting Blindenhulp
  • Stichting tot Verbetering van het Lot der Blinden
  • Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Oogziekenhuis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
cone-rod dystrophy, Danon disease, LAMP2, RPGR, retinal dystrophy, photoreceptor degeneration, retinal pigment epithelium, color vision loss, central scotoma, electroretinogram, ophthalmologic examination
MeSH terms
Aged, Electroretinography, Eye Proteins, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pedigree, Phenotype, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Visual Acuity, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Mutation, Missense, Siblings, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Lysosomal Membrane Proteins, Lysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein 2, Glycogen Storage Disease Type IIb, Visual Field Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review