Gender differences in the effects from working conditions on mental health: A 4-year follow-up
Abstract
Objectives The overall aim was to examine how working conditions in 1993 influenced the occurrence of poor mental health in 1997 among women and men from the general population. Also, the relative importance of other living conditions in relation to poor mental health in 1997 was examined.Methods A sample from the general Swedish population (originally examined in 1969) was followed up in 1993 and 1997. Data from these follow-ups were analysed, and both bivariate and multivariate analyses of associations between occupational and non-occupational conditions in 1993 and poor mental health in 1997 -- defined as sub-clinical depression, reduced psychological well-being and high alcohol consumption -- were performed.Results Several occupational risk indicators were identified for poor mental health among women, especially sub-clinical depression and high alcohol consumption. Occupational factors such as shift work, job strain, no education at the employer's expense, low occupational pride, low stimulation at work and poor social support were related to poor mental health among women. For poor mental health among men, mainly sub-clinical depression, shift work and low occupational pride were identified as risk indicators. Non-occupational factors related to poor mental health among women were poor quality of social contacts, demanding life events, physical inactivity, high perceived physical load outside work and inadequate coping strategies. Among men, smoking and inadequate coping strategies were related to poor mental health.Conclusions The difference between women and men, regarding the numbers of identified occupational and non-occupational risk indicators, may partly be explained by the gender-segregated labour market, and partly by other explanations. In our study, we have not succeeded in collecting the relevant information about occupational conditions that is important for men's mental health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Circadian misalignment can heighten the risk for substance use and abuse.
“circadian misalignment can heighten the risk for substance use and abuse (123).”
From Impact of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms on Addiction Vulnerability in Adolescents (2018) · cites this paper as [123]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 207
- Authors
- Bildt, C., & Michélsen, H.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Bildt, Carina
- Venue
- International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 252-258
- ISSN
- 0340-0131 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1246
- OpenAlex
- W2018133523
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- working conditions, mental health, gender differences, occupational risk factors, alcohol consumption, shift work, job strain, social support, psychological well-being, coping strategies, smoking, physical inactivity, living conditions, longitudinal follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Sweden, Work Schedule Tolerance, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review