Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanical work and efficiency of 5+5 m shuttle running

Zamparo, Paola, Pavei, Gaspare, Nardello, Francesca, Bartolini, Davide, Monte, Andrea, Minetti, Alberto E.·2016·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Purpose Acceleration and deceleration phases characterise shuttle running (SR) compared to constant speed running (CR); mechanical work is thus expected to be larger in the former compared to the latter, at the same average speed (v mean). The aim of this study was to measure total mechanical work (W tot (+) , J kg(-1) m(-1)) during SR as the sum of internal (W int (+) ) and external (W ext (+) ) work and to calculate the efficiency of SR. Methods Twenty males were requested to perform shuttle runs over a distance of 5 + 5 m at different speeds (slow, moderate and fast) to record kinematic data. Metabolic data were also recorded (at fast speed only) to calculate energy cost (C, J kg(-1) m(-1)) and mechanical efficiency (eff(+) = W tot (+) C (-1)) of SR. Results Work parameters significantly increased with speed (P Conclusions W ext (+) is larger in SR than in CR (2.5 vs. 1.4 J kg(-1) m(-1) in the range of investigated speeds: 2-3.5 m s(-1)) and W int (+) , at fast speed, is about half of W tot (+) . eff(+) is lower in SR (16 %) than in CR (50-60 % at comparable speeds) and this can be attributed to a lower elastic energy reutilization due to the acceleration/deceleration phases over this short shuttle distance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-016-3443-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Abdelkrim NB, El Fazaa S, El Ati J (2007) Time-motion analysis and physiological data of elite under-19-year-old basketball players during competition. Br J Sports Med 41(2):69–75 · DOI
  2. Abdelkrim NB, Castagna C, Jabri I, Battikh T, El Fazaa S, El Ati J (2010) Activity profile and physiological requirements of junior basketball players in relation to aerobic-anaerobic fitness. J Strength Cond Res 24(9):2330–2342 · DOI
  3. Ahn AN, Furrow E, Biewener AA (2004) Walking and running in the red-legged running frog, Kassina maculata. J Exp Biol 207:399–410 · DOI
  4. Aleshinsky SY (1986) An energy ‘sources’ and ‘fractions’ approach to the mechanical energy expenditure problem. V. The mechanical energy expenditure reduction during motion of the multi-link system. J Biomech 19:311–315 · DOI
  5. Biewener AA (2006) Patterns of mechanical energy change in tetrapod gait: pendula, spring and work. J Exp Zool 305A:899–911 · DOI
  6. Buchheit M, Bishop D, Haydar B, Nakamura FY, Ahmaidi S (2010) Physiological responses to shuttle repeated-sprint running. Int J Sports Med 31:402–409 · DOI
  7. Buglione A, di Prampero PE (2013) The energy cost of shuttle running. Eur J Appl Physiol 113:1535–1543 · DOI
  8. Cavagna GA, Kaneko M (1977) Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. J Physiol 268:467–481 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cavagna GA, Komarek L, Mazzoleni S (1971) The mechanics of sprint running. J Physiol 217:709–721 · DOI
  10. di Prampero PE, Ferretti G (1999) The energetics of anaerobic muscle metabolism: a reappraisal of older and recent concepts. Resp Physiol 188:103–115 · DOI
  11. Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Castagna C, Bishop D, Bravo DF, Tibaudi A, Wisloff U (2008) Validity of a repeated-sprint test for football. Int J Sports Med 29(11):899–905 · DOI
  12. Makaje N, Ruangthai R, Arkarapanthu A, Yoopat P (2012) Physiological demands and activity profiles during futsal match play according to competitive level. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 52(4):366–374
  13. Margaria R, Oliva RD, di Prampero PE, Cerretelli P (1969) Energy utilization in intermittent exercise at supramaximal speeds. J Appl Physiol 26:752–756 · DOI
  14. Minetti AE, Ardigò LP, Saibene F (1993) Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man. J Physiol 472:725–735 [Erratum in: J Physiol (1994) 475:548] · DOI · Paper page
  15. Minetti AE, Gaudino P, Seminati E, Cazzola D (2013) The cost of transport of human running is not affected, as in walking, by wide acceleration/deceleration cycles. J Appl Physiol 114:498–503 · DOI
  16. Rubenson J, Heliams DB, Lloyd DG, Fournier PA (2004) Gait selection in the ostrich: mechanical and metabolic characteristics of walking and running with and without an aerial phase. Proc Biol Sci 271:1091–1099 · DOI
  17. Stevens TG, De Ruiter CG, Van Maurik D, Van Lierop CJ, Savelsbergh GJ, Beek PJ (2015) Measured and estimated energy cost of constant and shuttle running in soccer players. Med Sci Sport Exerc 47:1219–1224 · DOI
  18. Winter DA (2005) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 1–369
  19. Wooledge RC, Curtin NA, Homsher E (1985) Energetic aspects of muscle contraction. Monogr Physiol Soc 41:1–357
  20. Zadro I, Sepulcri L, Lazzer S, Fregolent R, Zamparo P (2011) A protocol of intermittent exercise (shuttle runs) to train young basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 25:1767–1773 · DOI
  21. Zamparo P, Zadro I, Lazzer S, Beato M, Sepulcri L (2014) Energetics of shuttle runs: the effects of distance and change of direction. Int J Sport Physiol Perf 9:1033–1039 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Zamparo P, Bolomini F, Nardello F, Beato M (2015) Energetics (and kinematics) of short shuttle runs. Eur J Appl Physiol 115:1985–1994 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Zamparo, P., Pavei, G., Nardello, F., Bartolini, D., Monte, A., & Minetti, A. E.
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2016-07-29
Volume
116
Issue
10
Pages
1911-1919
ISSN
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
Cited by
40
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical work and efficiency of 5+5 m shuttle running. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00421-016-3443-6
The paper
Zamparo, P., Pavei, G., Nardello, F., Bartolini, D., Monte, A., & Minetti, A. E. (2016). Mechanical work and efficiency of 5+5 m shuttle running. European Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3443-6