Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energetics of Shuttle Runs: The Effects of Distance and Change of Direction

Zamparo, Paola, Zadro, Ivan, Lazzer, Stefano, Beato, Marco, Sepulcri, Luigino·2014·International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Abstract

Shuttle runs can be used to study the physiological responses in sports (such as basketball) characterized by sprints (accelerations/decelerations) and changes of direction. Purpose: To determine the energy cost (C) of shuttle runs with different turning angles and over different distances (with different acceleration/deceleration patterns). Methods: Nine basketball players were asked to complete 6 intermittent tests over different distances (5, 10, 25 m) and with different changes of direction (180° at 5 and 25 m; 0°, 45°, 90°, and 180° at 10 m) at maximal speed (v ≍ 4.5 m/s), each composed by 10 shuttle runs of 10-s duration and 30-s recovery; during these runs oxygen uptake (VO 2), blood lactate (La b), and C were determined. Results: For a given shuttle distance (10 m) no major differences where observed in VO 2 (~33 mL · min−1 · kg−1), La b (~3.75 mM), and C (~21.2 J · m−1 · kg−1) when the shuttle runs were performed with different turning angles. For a given turning angle (180°), VO 2 and La b were found to increase with the distance covered (VO 2 from 26 to 35 mL · min−1 · kg−1; La b from 0.7 to 7.6 mM) while C was found to decrease with it (from 29.9 to 10.6 J · m−1 · kg−1); the relationship between C and d (m) is well described by C = 92.99 × d0.656, R2 = .971. Conclusions: The metabolic demands of shuttle tests run at maximal speeds can be estimated based on the running distance, while the turning angle plays a minor role in determining C.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0258

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Drinkwater EJ, 2008, Sports Med., 38, 565, 10.2165/00007256-200838070-00004 · DOI
  2. Ben Abdelkrim N, 2007, Br J Sports Med., 41, 69, 10.1136/bjsm.2006.032318 · DOI
  3. Ben Abdelkrim N, 2010, J Strength Cond Res., 24, 2652, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e2e0a3 · DOI
  4. Ben Abdelkrim N, 2010, J Strength Cond Res., 24, 2330, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e381c1 · DOI
  5. McInnes SE, 1995, J Sports Sci., 13, 387, 10.1080/02640419508732254 · DOI
  6. Zadro I, 2011, J Strength Cond Res., 25, 1767, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181da85d1 · DOI
  7. Narazaki K, 2009, Scand J Med Sci Sports., 19, 425, 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00789.x · DOI
  8. Scanlan A, 2011, J Sports Sci., 29, 1153, 10.1080/02640414.2011.582509 · DOI
  9. Buglione A, 2013, Eur J Appl Physiol., 113, 1535, 10.1007/s00421-012-2580-9 · DOI
  10. Minetti AE, 2001, Am Zool., 41, 205
  11. Minetti AE, 2013, J Appl Physiol., 114, 498, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00959.2012 · DOI
  12. di Prampero PE, 2005, J Exp Biol., 208, 2809, 10.1242/jeb.01700 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hewit JK, 2013, J Strength Cond Res., 27, 69, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824f202d · DOI
  14. Schot P, 1995, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther., 22, 254, 10.2519/jospt.1995.22.6.254 · DOI
  15. Wasserman K, 1973, J Appl Physiol., 35, 236, 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.2.236 · DOI
  16. di Prampero PE, 1999, Respir Physiol., 118, 103, 10.1016/S0034-5687(99)00083-3 · DOI
  17. di Prampero PE, 1986, Int J Sports Med., 7, 55, 10.1055/s-2008-1025736 · DOI
  18. Margaria R, 1969, J Appl Physiol., 26, 752, 10.1152/jappl.1969.26.6.752 · DOI
  19. Linossier MT, 1997, Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol., 75, 491, 10.1007/s004210050194 · DOI
  20. MacDougall JD, 1998, J Appl Physiol., 84, 2138, 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.6.2138 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zamparo, P., Zadro, I., Lazzer, S., Beato, M., & Sepulcri, L.
Venue
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Published
2014-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
1033-1039
ISSN
  • 1555-0265
  • 1555-0273
Cited by
48
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energetics of Shuttle Runs: The Effects of Distance and Change of Direction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1123/ijspp.2013-0258
The paper
Zamparo, P., Zadro, I., Lazzer, S., Beato, M., & Sepulcri, L. (2014). Energetics of Shuttle Runs: The Effects of Distance and Change of Direction. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2013-0258