Cited by 97Muscle Physiology and DisordersCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and Training

Adaptations in rat skeletal muscle following long-term resistance exercise training

Duncan, Noel D., Williams, David A., Lynch, Gordon S.·1998·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether long-term, heavy resistance training would cause adaptations in rat skeletal muscle structure and function. Ten male Wistar rats (3 weeks old) were trained to climb a 40-cm vertical ladder (4 days/week) while carrying progressively heavier loads secured to their tails. After 26 weeks of training the rats were capable of lifting up to 800 g or 140% of their individual body mass for four sets of 12-15 repetitions per session. No difference in body mass was observed between the trained rats and age-matched sedentary control rats. Absolute and relative heart mass were greater in trained rats than control rats. When expressed relative to body mass, the mass of the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and soleus muscles was greater in trained rats than control rats. No difference in absolute muscle mass or maximum force-producing capacity was evident in either the EDL or soleus muscles after training, although both muscles exhibited an increased resistance to fatigue. Individual fibre hypertrophy was evident in all four skeletal muscles investigated, i.e. EDL, soleus, plantaris and rectus femoris muscles of trained rats, but muscle fibre type proportions within each of the muscles tested remained unchanged. Despite an increased ability of the rats to lift progressively heavier loads, this heavy resistance training model did not induce gross muscle hypertrophy nor did it increase the force-producing capacity of the EDL or soleus muscles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004210050347

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duncan, N. D., Williams, D. A., & Lynch, G. S.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
372-378
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2035968822
Cited by
97
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
resistance training, skeletal muscle adaptation, muscle hypertrophy, muscle fiber type distribution, muscle fatigue resistance, force generation, cardiac mass, extensor digitorum longus, soleus muscle, plantaris muscle, rectus femoris, rats
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Body Weight, Citrate (si)-Synthase, Heart, Hypertrophy, Isometric Contraction, Male, Organ Size, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Succinate Dehydrogenase, Rats, Wistar, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Muscle Fatigue, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review