Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair.

Rickert, A., Kienle, P., Kuthe, A., Baumann, P., Engemann, R., Kuhlgatz, J., von Frankenberg, M., Knaebel, H. P., Büchler, M. W.·2012·Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
DOI 10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. van't Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89:1350–1356 · DOI
  2. Andersen LP, Klein M, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J (2008) Incisional hernia after open versus laparoscopic sigmoid resection. Surg Endosc 22:2026–2029 · DOI
  3. Altom LK, Snyder CW, Gray SH, Graham LA, Vick CC, Hawn MT (2011) Outcomes of emergent incisional hernia repair. Am J Surg 77:971–976 · DOI
  4. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2010) Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 251:843–856 · DOI
  6. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kingsnorth AN, Sivarajasingham N, Wong S, Butler M (2004) Open mesh repair of incisional hernia with significant loss of domain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86:363–366 · DOI
  8. Israelsson LA, Smedberg S, Montgomery A, Nordin P, Spangen L (2006) Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002. Hernia 10:258–261 · DOI
  9. den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD006438
  10. Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U (2005) The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Device 2:103–117 · DOI
  11. Ladurner R, Chiapponi C, Linhuber Q, Mussack T (2011) Long term outcome and quality of life after open incisional hernia repair—light versus heavy weight meshes. BMC Surg 11:25 · DOI
  12. Conze J, Kingsnorth AN, Flament JB, Simmermacher R, Arlt G, Langer C, Schippers E, Hartley M, Schumpelick V (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:1488–1493 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Seiler C, Baumann P, Kienle P, Kuthe A, Kuhlgatz J, Engemann R, von Frankenberg M, Knaebel HP (2010) A randomised, multi-centre, prospective double blind pilot-study to evaluate safety and efficiency of the non-absorbable Optilene® Mesh Elastic versus the partly absorbable Ultrapro® Mesh for incisional hernia repair. BMC Surg 10:21 · DOI
  14. Schumpelick V, van Ackeren A, Klinge U (2000) Hernien. Thieme Verlag, 266–267 · DOI
  15. Bullinger M (1996) Assessment of health related quality of life with the SF-36 Health Survey. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 35:XVII–XXVII
  16. Le H, Bender JS (2005) Retrofascial mesh repair of ventral incisional hernias. Am J Surg 189:373–375 · DOI
  17. Kurzer M, Kark A, Selouk S, Belsham P (2008) Open mesh repair of incisional hernia using a sublay technique: long-term follow-up. World J Surg 32:31–36 · DOI
  18. Ambrosiani N, Harb J, Gavelli A, Huguet C (1994) Failure of the treatment of eventrations and hernias with the PTFE plate (111 cases). Ann Chir 48:917–920
  19. Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, de Jong D, van der Wilt GJ, van Goor H, Bleichrodt RP (2004) Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia 8:56–59 · DOI
  20. Rios A, Rodriguez JM, Munitiz V, Alcaraz P, Pérez D, Parrilla P (2001) Factors that affect recurrence after incisional herniorrhaphy with prosthetic material. Eur J Surg 167:855–859 · DOI
  21. Korenkov M, Sauerland S, Arndt M, Bograd L, Neugebauer EA, Troidl H (2002) Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia. Br J Surg 89:50–56 · DOI
  22. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg 164:965–969 · DOI
  23. Welty G, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Kasperk R, Schumpelick V (2001) Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes. Hernia 5:142–147 · DOI
  24. Benhidjeb T, Bärlehner E, Anders S (2003) Laparoskopische Narbenhernienreparation. Chir Gastroenterol 19:16–22 · DOI
  25. Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Müller C, Meurer K, Bauer KH, Papapostolou G, Uhl W (2007) Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes—a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 31:234–244 · DOI
  26. Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (1998) Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair. Biomaterials 19:2235–2246 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Schumpelick V, Klinge U, Junge K, Stumpf M (2004) Incisional abdominal hernia: the open mesh repair. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:1–5 · DOI
  28. Weber G, Horváth OP (2002) Results of ventral hernia repair: comparison of suture repair with mesh implantation (onlay vs. sublay) using open and laparoscopic approach—prospective, randomized, multicentre study. Magy Seb 55:285–289
  29. Wéber G, Baracs J, Horváth OP (2010) “Onlay” mesh provides significantly better results than “sublay” reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicentre study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh—results of a five-years follow-up. Magy Seb 63:302–311 · DOI
  30. Bellon JM, Rodriguez M, Garcia-Honduvilla N, Gomez-Gil V, Pascual G, Bujan J (2008) Postimplant behavior of lightweight polypropylene meshes in an experimental model of abdominal hernia. J Invest Surg 21:280–287 · DOI
  31. Bellón JM, Rodríguez M, García-Honduvilla N, Gómez-Gil V, Pascual G, Buján J (2009) Comparing the behavior of different polypropylene meshes (heavy and lightweight) in an experimental model of ventral hernia repair. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 89:448–455 · DOI
  32. Bellón JM, Rodríguez M, García-Honduvilla N, Pascual G, Buján J (2007) Partially absorbable meshes for hernia repair offer advantages over nonabsorbable meshes. Am J Surg 194:68–74 · DOI
  33. Paajanen H (2007) A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three composite meshes on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair in local anesthesia. Hernia 11:335–339 · DOI
  34. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Alam F, Tang TY, Walsh SR, Sadat U (2010) Partially or completely absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair for inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:213–219 · DOI
  35. Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Felländer G, Heikkinen T (2005) One year results of a randomised controlled multi-centre study comparing Prolene and Vypro II-mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty. Hernia 9:223–227 · DOI
  36. Snyder CW, Graham LA, Vick CC, Gray SH, Finan KR, Hawn MT (2011) Patient satisfaction, chronic pain, and quality of life after elective incisional hernia repair: effects of recurrence and repair technique. Hernia 15:123–129 · DOI
  37. Schmidbauer S, Ladurner R, Hallfeldt KK, Mussack T (2005) Heavy-weight versus low-weight polypropylene meshes for open sublay mesh repair of incisional hernia. Eur J Med Res 10:247–253

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rickert, A., Kienle, P., Kuthe, A., Baumann, P., Engemann, R., Kuhlgatz, J., von Frankenberg, M., Knaebel, H. P., & Büchler, M. W.
Venue
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-10-03
Volume
397
Issue
8
Pages
1225-1234
ISSN
  • 1435-2443
  • 1435-2451
DOI
10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6
Cited by
27
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.