Spontaneous eye blinks during creative task correlate with divergent processing
Abstract
Creativity consists of divergent and convergent thinking, with both related to individual eye blinks at rest. To assess underlying mechanisms between eye blinks and traditional creativity tasks, we investigated the relationship between creativity performance and eye blinks at rest and during tasks. Participants performed an alternative uses and remote association task while eye blinks were recorded. Results showed that the relationship between eye blinks at rest and creativity performance was compatible with those of previous research. Interestingly, we found that the generation of ideas increased as a function of eye blink number during the alternative uses task. On the other hand, during the remote association task, accuracy was independent of eye blink number during the task, but response time increased with it. Moreover, eye blink changes in participants who responded quickly during the remote association task were different depending on their resting state eye blinks; that is, participants with many eye blinks during rest showed little increasing eye blinks and achieved solutions quickly. Positive correlations between eye blinks during creative tasks and yielding ideas on the alternative uses task and response time on the remote association task suggest that eye blinks during creativity tasks relate to divergent thinking processes such as conceptual reorganization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decreased blink rate has been found to occur in EHR-based tasks requiring more cognitive workload.
“Decreased blink rate has been found to occur in EHR-based tasks requiring more cognitive workload.37”
From Association of the Usability of Electronic Health Records With Cognitive Workload and Performance Levels Among Physicians (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
Cites
Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Dreisbach, G., Müller, J., Goschke, T., Strobel, A., Schulze, K., Lesch, K.-P., & Brocke, B. (2005) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.119.2.483 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mazur, L. M., Mosaly, P. R., Moore, C., & Marks, L. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1709 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
de Rooij, A., & Vromans, R. D. (2020) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.379 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ueda, Y., Tominaga, A., Kajimura, S., & Nomura, M.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ueda, Yoshiyuki
- Venue
- Psychological Research
- Published
- 2015-04-12
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 652-659
- ISSN
- 0033-3026 (ISSN-L)
- 0340-0727
- 1430-2772
- OpenAlex
- W1969754328
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychological Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Naito Foundation
- Hayao Nakayama Foundation for Science and Technology and Culture
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26540065, 24240041)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- blinking, creativity, divergent thinking, convergent thinking, alternative uses task, reaction time (psychology), resting state, conceptual reorganization, spontaneous behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blinking, Creativity, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review