Cited by 33Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceMind wandering and attentionSleep and Wakefulness Research

Spontaneous eye blinks during creative task correlate with divergent processing

Ueda, Yoshiyuki, Tominaga, Atsuko, Kajimura, Shogo, Nomura, Michio·2016·Psychological Research

Abstract

Creativity consists of divergent and convergent thinking, with both related to individual eye blinks at rest. To assess underlying mechanisms between eye blinks and traditional creativity tasks, we investigated the relationship between creativity performance and eye blinks at rest and during tasks. Participants performed an alternative uses and remote association task while eye blinks were recorded. Results showed that the relationship between eye blinks at rest and creativity performance was compatible with those of previous research. Interestingly, we found that the generation of ideas increased as a function of eye blink number during the alternative uses task. On the other hand, during the remote association task, accuracy was independent of eye blink number during the task, but response time increased with it. Moreover, eye blink changes in participants who responded quickly during the remote association task were different depending on their resting state eye blinks; that is, participants with many eye blinks during rest showed little increasing eye blinks and achieved solutions quickly. Positive correlations between eye blinks during creative tasks and yielding ideas on the alternative uses task and response time on the remote association task suggest that eye blinks during creativity tasks relate to divergent thinking processes such as conceptual reorganization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00426-015-0665-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ueda, Y., Tominaga, A., Kajimura, S., & Nomura, M.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ueda, Yoshiyuki
Venue
Psychological Research
Published
2015-04-12
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
652-659
ISSN
  • 0033-3026 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-0727
  • 1430-2772
OpenAlex
W1969754328
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Naito Foundation
  • Hayao Nakayama Foundation for Science and Technology and Culture
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26540065, 24240041)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
blinking, creativity, divergent thinking, convergent thinking, alternative uses task, reaction time (psychology), resting state, conceptual reorganization, spontaneous behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Blinking, Creativity, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review