The (Dis)Pleasures of Creativity: Spontaneous Eye Blink Rate during Divergent and Convergent Thinking Depends on Individual Differences in Positive and Negative Affect
Open accessAbstract
Previous research has demonstrated that individual differences in affect and motivation predict divergent and convergent thinking performance, two thinking processes involved in creative idea generation. Individual differences in affect and motivation also predict spontaneous eye blink rate ( sEBR ) during divergent and convergent thinking; and sEBR predicts divergent and convergent thinking performance. This study investigates experimentally whether the relationship between sEBR and divergent and convergent thinking depends on individual differences in affect and motivation. Eighty‐two participants completed the Emotion/motivation‐related Divergent and Convergent thinking styles Scale ( EDICOS ; G. Soroa et al., 2015), performed the alternative uses task ( AUT ; divergent thinking) or the remote associates task ( RAT ; convergent thinking), while their sEBR was captured with an eye‐tracker. The results showed that individual differences in positive affect positively correlated with sEBR for the AUT , whereas individual differences in negative affect positively correlated with sEBR for the RAT . Furthermore, the interaction between individual differences in positive and negative affect and sEBR predicted divergent and convergent thinking performance. The contribution of our study is therefore that individual differences in positive and negative affect can both positively correlate with sEBR during divergent and convergent thinking; and that this predicts divergent and convergent thinking performance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The contribution of motivational and affective factors on human performance cannot be ruled out.
“In addition, the contribution of motivational27 and affective28 factors on human performance cannot be ruled out”
From Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Nature of Human Intelligence
Carroll, J. B., & Guilford, J. P. (1968) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161820 · Cited by 4,657 · see citing works
The standard definition of creativity
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 · Cited by 3,895 · see citing works
OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7 · Cited by 2,648 · see citing works
Baas, M., Dreu, C. K. W. D., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0012815 · Cited by 1,697 · see citing works
Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929 · Cited by 1,533 · see citing works
In Praise of Convergent Thinking
Cropley, A. J. (2006) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13 · Cited by 1,246 · see citing works
The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence
Nijstad, B. A., Dreu, C. K. W. D., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463281003765323 · Cited by 1,062 · see citing works
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
Dreu, C. K. W. D., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739 · Cited by 1,046 · see citing works
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., Martinez, J. L., & Richard, C. A. (2008) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
The neurobiology of positive emotions
Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.001 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Mechanisms of motivation–cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities
Braver, T. S., Krug, M. K., Chiew, K. S., Kool, W., Westbrook, J. A., Clement, N. J., Adcock, R. A., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M., Carver, C. S., et al. (2014) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0300-0 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using?
Cropley, A. J. (2000) · Roeper Review · doi:10.1080/02783190009554069 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Dalmaijer, E. S., Mathôt, S., & der Stigchel, S. V. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0422-2 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Creative abilities in the arts.
Guilford, J. P. (1957) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048280 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
A Brain Mechanism for Facilitation of Insight by Positive Affect
Subramaniam, K., Kounios, J., Parrish, T. B., & Beeman, M. J. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21057 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.007 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
A Dynamic Perspective on Affect and Creativity
Bledow, R., Rosing, K., & Fresé, M. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0894 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.545713 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Creative Thinking: Processes, Strategies, and Knowledge
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.003 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Goschke, T., & Bolte, A. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.015 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Creativity as flexible cognitive control
Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2010) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0017379 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Creative approaches to problem solving a framework for innovation and change
Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2011) · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Roskes, M., Dreu, C. D. D., & Nijstad, B. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028442 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Diurnal variation in spontaneous eye-blink rate
Barbato, G., Ficca, G., Muscettola, G., Fichele, M., Beatrice, M., & Rinaldi, F. (2000) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00108-6 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Cruz, A. A. V. E., Garcia, D. M., Pinto, C. T., et al. (2011) · The Ocular Surface · doi:10.1016/s1542-0124(11)70007-6 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Why do employees undertake creative action?
Unsworth, K. L., & Clegg, C. (2009) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317908x398377 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Emotion and regulation are one!
Kappas, A. (2011) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073910380971 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Creative mood swings: divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways
Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2011) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0358-z · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Chermahini, S. A., Hickendorff, M., & Hommel, B. (2012) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.02.003 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Creativity related cortex activity in the remote associates task
Razumnikova, O. M. (2007) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.02.008 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Creativity and cognition:Producing effective novelty
Cropley, A. J. (1999) · Roeper Review · doi:10.1080/02783199909553972 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Methods for investigating the neural components of insight
Bowden, E. M., & JUNGBEEMAN, M. (2007) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.11.007 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs
Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Franconeri, S., Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. J. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0845-0 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
More creative through positive mood? Not everyone!
Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00319 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Striatum on the anxiety map: Small detours into adolescence
Lago, T. R., Davis, A. A., Grillon, C., & Ernst, M. (2016) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.06.006 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Regulating cognitive control through approach-avoidance motor actions
Koch, S., Holland, R. W., & van Knippenberg, A. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.014 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Miron‐Spektor, E., Efrat‐Treister, D., Rafaeli, A., & Schwarz-Cohen, O. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023593 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Zabelina, D. L., Colzato, L. S., Beeman, M. J., & Hommel, B. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146768 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Conflict acts as an implicit cost in reinforcement learning
Cavanagh, J. F., Masters, S. E., Bath, K. G., & Frank, M. J. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6394 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Hope as a psychiatric variable
Erickson, R. C., Post, R. D., & Paige, A. B. (1975) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197504)31:2 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Looking for Creativity: Where Do We Look When We Look for New Ideas?
Salvi, C., & Bowden, E. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00161 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Dopamine is released in the striatum during human emotional processing
Badgaiyan, R. D. (2010) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e3283410955 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
TOWARD AN IMPROVED MEASURE OF REMOTE ASSOCIATIONAL ABILITY
Worthen, B. R., & Clark, P. M. (1971) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1971.tb00914.x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The Emotive Roots of Creativity
Dreu, C. K. W. D., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374714-3.00010-0 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Byrne, K. A., Norris, D. D., & Worthy, D. A. (2015) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-015-0377-0 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Soroa, G., Balluerka, N., Hommel, B., & Aritzeta, A. (2015) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.05.002 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
de Rooij, A., Corr, P. J., & Jones, S. (2015) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/2757226.2757227 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Spontaneous eye blinks during creative task correlate with divergent processing
Ueda, Y., Tominaga, A., Kajimura, S., & Nomura, M. (2016) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0665-x · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Eye blink rate predicts reward decisions in adolescents
Barkley‐Levenson, E. E., & Galván, A. (2016) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12412 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Spontaneous Eye-Blink Rate as an Index of Reward Responsivity
Peckham, A., & Johnson, S. L. (2015) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702615594999 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
de Rooij, A., Corr, P. J., & Jones, S. (2017) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/3059454.3059469 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
de Rooij, A., & Jones, S. (2013) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/2466627.2466658 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Mednick, M. T. S., & Halpern, S. (1962) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t11859-000 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
de Rooij, A., & Jones, S. (2015) · International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI) · doi:10.1145/2677199.2680552 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task
Koivisto, M., & Grassini, S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-40858-3 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Rooij, A., & Vromans, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University
- Tilburg University (NL)
- ORCID
- Vromans, Ruben D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Creative Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-27
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 436-452
- ISSN
- 0022-0175 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-6057
- OpenAlex
- W2893837894
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Creative Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Keywords
- divergent thinking, convergent thinking, positive affect, negative affect, individual differences, creativity, motivation, alternative uses task, remote associates task, eye tracking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review