Parallel alterations in the timing of ovarian Ecdysone Receptor and Ultraspiracle expression characterize the independent evolution of larval reproduction in two species of gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae)
Abstract
Although most insects reproduce in the adult stage, facultative larval or pupal reproduction (paedogenesis) has evolved at least six times independently in insects, twice in gall midges of the family Cecidomyiidae (Diptera). Paedogenesis in gall midges involves the precocious growth and differentiation of the ovary in an otherwise larval form. We have previously shown that the timing of expression of the Ecdysone Receptor (EcR) and Ultraspiracle (USP), the two proteins that constitute the functional receptor for the steroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone, regulates the timing and progression of ovarian differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Here we test the hypothesis that precocious activation of EcR and USP in the ovaries of paedogenetic gall midges allows for precocious ovarian differentiation. Using monoclonal antibodies directed against insect EcR and USP proteins, we first show that when these gall midges are reared under conditions that promote typical, metamorphic development, up- regulation of EcR and USP occurs in the final larval stage. By contrast, in the paedogenetic life cycle, EcR and USP are up-regulated early in the first larval stage. A similar pattern is seen for two independently-evolved paedogenetic gall midges, Heteropeza pygmaea and Mycophila speyeri. We discuss our results in the context of developmental constraints on the evolution of paedogenesis in dipteran insects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In gall midges such as Mycophila speyeri, larval parthenogenesis proceeds via viviparous thelytoky, with mothers giving birth to live all-female progeny initially developing from unfertilised eggs.
“In gall midges such as Mycophila speyeri (Fig. 1a), larval parthenogenesis proceeds via viviparous thelytoky, i.e. mothers give birth to live all-female progeny initially developing from unfertilised eggs (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000; Normark, 2003).”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
Sexually reproducing females of Mycophila speyeri undergo a normal metamorphic cycle, where ovary development is no longer accelerated, and follicle and oocyte formation occur during the pre-pupal and early pupal stages, respectively.
“Sexually reproducing females undergo a normal metamorphic cycle, where ovary development is no longer accelerated, and follicle and oocyte formation occur during the pre-pupal and early pupal stages, respectively (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000).”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
When fresh fungal hyphae are present (high-quality food), up-regulation of EcR and USP occurs early in the first larval instar, leading to paedomorphic development.
“However, when fresh fungal hyphae are present (high-quality food), up-regulation of EcR and USP occurs early in the first larval instar, leading to paedomorphic development (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000).”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
In type I paedomorphosis, gall midges have evolved an alternative strategy involving early up-regulation of ecdysone receptor (EcR) and ultraspiracle (USP) in the ovaries.
“In type I paedomorphosis, gall midges have evolved an alternative strategy involving early up-regulation of ecdysone receptor (EcR) and ultraspiracle (USP) in the ovaries.”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
In gall midges with the capacity for paedomorphosis, when available fungal hyphae are old (low-quality food), EcR and USP up-regulation occurs only in the final larval stage and the flies undergo metamorphosis.
“This is also the case in gall midges with the capacity for paedomorphosis, when available fungal hyphae are old (low-quality food) and flies undergo metamorphosis (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000).”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
The loss of complete metamorphosis may be more common than is currently appreciated.
“Given the lack of knowledge concerning the pre-pupal biology of most insects (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000), which can be both highly cryptic (Kathirithamby & Johnston, 2004) and difficult to study (Mjöberg, 1925), the loss of complete metamorphosis may be more common than is currently appreciated.”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
The ultimate causal mechanism behind the avoidance of metamorphosis is unknown.
“the ultimate causal mechanism behind the avoidance of metamorphosis is unknown (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000).”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
The pattern of precocious up-regulation of EcR and USP is highly similar in both species of paedomorphic gall midge so far examined (Heteropeza pygmaea and Mycophila speyeri), despite the proposed convergent evolution of type I paedomorphosis in these species.
“Interestingly, the pattern of precocious up-regulation of EcR and USP is highly similar in both species of paedomorphic gall midge so far examined ( Heteropeza pygmaea and Mycophila speyeri ), despite the proposed convergent evolution of type I paedomorphosis in these species (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000).”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
Hodin and Riddiford (2000) postulated that the loss of complete metamorphosis by type I paedomorphosis is concentrated in more basally located dipteran lineages (except for M. debilis) due to the predominance of early germ line development in basally occurring dipteran lineages, where this process can begin as early as embryogenesis.
“For example, Hodin and Riddiford (2000) postulated that the loss of complete metamorphosis by type I paedomorphosis is concentrated in more basally located dipteran lineages (except for M. debilis ) due to the predominance of early germ line development in basally occurring dipteran lineages, where this process can begin as early as embryogenesis.”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
In the typical insect pattern, including the higher flies, ovarian somatic cell types differentiate before the germ line.
“This is in contrast to the typical insect pattern, including the higher flies, where ovarian somatic cell types differentiate before the germ line (Hodin & Riddiford, 2000).”
From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Hodin & Riddiford, 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hormone signaling in evolution and development: a non-model system approachs
Heyland, A., Hodin, J., & Reitzel, A. M. (2005) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20136 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis
MCMAHON, D. P., & HAYWARD, A. (2016) · Ecological Entomology · doi:10.1111/een.12313 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
She Shapes Events as they Come: Plasticity in Female Insect Reproduction
Hodin, J. (2009) · Phenotypic Plasticity of Insects · doi:10.1201/b10201-12 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationErezyilmaz, D. F., Hayward, A., Huang, Y., Paps, J., Acs, Z., Delgado, J. A., Collantes, F., & Kathirithamby, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093614 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hodin, J., & Riddiford, L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Development Genes and Evolution
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 358-372
- ISSN
- 0043-5546 (ISSN-L)
- 0949-944X
- 1432-041X
- OpenAlex
- W2012760644
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Development Genes and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-29971, R01NS029971)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-07183, T32HD007183)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
- Keywords
- paedogenesis, gall midges, ecdysone receptor, ultraspiracle, 20-hydroxyecdysone, ovarian differentiation, gene expression timing, evolution of reproduction, developmental constraints, metamorphosis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Differentiation, Diptera, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Food, Immunohistochemistry, Larva, Metamorphosis, Biological, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Ovary, Phylogeny, Pupa, Receptors, Steroid, Reproduction, Time Factors, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Drosophila Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review