Cited by 105Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationEstrogen and related hormone effects

The ecdysone receptor and ultraspiracle regulate the timing and progression of ovarian morphogenesis during Drosophila metamorphosis

Hodin, J., Riddiford, Lynn M.·1998·Development Genes and Evolution

Abstract

Ecdysteroids regulate insect metamorphosis through the edysone receptor complex, a heterodimeric nuclear receptor consisting of the ecdysone receptor (EcR) and its partner ultraspiracle (USP). Differentiation in the Drosophila ovary at metamorphosis correlates with colocalization of USP and the EcR-A isoform in all but one of eight mesoderm-derived somatic cell types. The one exception is the larval terminal filament (TF) cells, in which only USP is detectable during cell differentiation. In cells destined to form the basal stalks and anterior oviduct, USP colocalizes with what appears to be the EcR-B2 isoform. Flies heterozygous for a deletion of the EcR gene exhibit several defects in ovarian morphogenesis, including a heterochronic delay in the onset of terminal filament differentiation. Flies heterozygous for a strong usp allele exhibit accelerated TF differentiation. Flies simultaneously heterozygous for both EcR and usp have additional phenotypes, including several heterochronic shifts, delayed initiation and completion of terminal filament morphogenesis and delayed ovarian differentiation during the first day of metamorphosis. Terminal filament morphogenesis is severely disrupted in homozygous usp clones. Our results demonstrate that proper expression of the ecdysone receptor complex is required to maintain the normal progression and timing of the events of ovarian differentiation in Drosophila. These findings are discussed in the context of a developmental and evoluti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004270050186

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodin, J., & Riddiford, L. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Development Genes and Evolution
Published
1998-08
Volume
208
Issue
6
Pages
304-317
ISSN
  • 0043-5546 (ISSN-L)
  • 0949-944X
  • 1432-041X
OpenAlex
W2023346578
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development Genes and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-29971, R01NS029971)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-07183, T32HD007183)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
ecdysone receptor, ultraspiracle, ovarian morphogenesis, Drosophila metamorphosis, heterochrony, ecdysteroid signaling, nuclear receptor heterodimers, ovarian differentiation, dipteran insects
MeSH terms
Animals, Bromodeoxyuridine, Cell Differentiation, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Heterozygote, Immunohistochemistry, Metamorphosis, Biological, Ovary, Receptors, Steroid, Transcription Factors, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review