Detection of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies with deep neural networks
Open accessAbstract
The presence of perineural invasion (PNI) by carcinoma in prostate biopsies has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis. The assessment and quantification of PNI are, however, labor intensive. To aid pathologists in this task, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm based on deep neural networks. We collected, digitized, and pixel-wise annotated the PNI findings in each of the approximately 80,000 biopsy cores from the 7406 men who underwent biopsy in a screening trial between 2012 and 2014. In total, 485 biopsy cores showed PNI. We also digitized more than 10% (n = 8318) of the PNI negative biopsy cores. Digitized biopsies from a random selection of 80% of the men were used to build the AI algorithm, while 20% were used to evaluate its performance. For detecting PNI in prostate biopsy cores, the AI had an estimated area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99) based on 106 PNI positive cores and 1652 PNI negative cores in the independent test set. For a pre-specified operating point, this translates to sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.97. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 0.67 and 0.99, respectively. The concordance of the AI with pathologists, measured by mean pairwise Cohen's kappa (0.74), was comparable to inter-pathologist concordance (0.68 to 0.75). The proposed algorithm detects PNI in prostate biopsies with acceptable performance. This could aid pathologists by reducing the number of biopsies that need to be assessed for PNI and by highlighting regions of diagnostic interest.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kartasalo and colleagues developed an AI model using H&E images to detect perineural invasion, a key prognostic marker associated with poor outcomes in prostate cancer.
“Kartasalo and colleagues (67) have developed an AI model using H&E images to detect perineural invasion-a key prognostic marker associated with poor outcomes in prostate cancer.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Kartasalo, K., Ström, P., Ruusuvuori, P., Samaratunga, H., Delahunt, B., Tsuzuki, T., Eklund, M., & Egevad, L.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- University of Turku (FI)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Aichi Medical University (JP)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Egevad, Lars
- ORCID
- Venue
- Virchows Archiv
- Published
- 2022-04-21
- Volume
- 481
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-82
- ISSN
- 0945-6317 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2307
- PMC
- PMC9226086
- OpenAlex
- W3014331134
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Cancerfonden (CAN 2017/210)
- Syöpäsäätiö (341967, 334782)
- Karolinska Institute
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- perineural invasion, prostate cancer, prostate needle biopsy, deep neural network, artificial intelligence, computer-aided diagnosis, pixel-wise annotation, digital pathology
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Biopsy, Needle, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review