Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology is advancing beyond algorithm development to integration into clinical practice. This review describes the current state of the field, with a specific focus on clinical integration. AI applications are structured according to cancer type and clinical domain, focusing on the four most common cancers and tasks of detection, diagnosis, and treatment. These applications encompass various data modalities, including imaging, genomics, and medical records. We conclude with a summary of existing challenges, evolving solutions, and potential future directions for the field. Significance: AI is increasingly being applied to all aspects of oncology, where several applications are maturing beyond research and development to direct clinical integration. This review summarizes the current state of the field through the lens of clinical translation along the clinical care continuum. Emerging areas are also highlighted, along with common challenges, evolving solutions, and potential future directions for the field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 226 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationnone given
Several AI applications in oncology are progressing past research and development toward direct use in clinical care.
“AI is increasingly being applied to all aspects of oncology, where several applications are maturing beyond research and development to direct clinical integration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
FDA-cleared AI algorithms have been developed to aid interpretation of breast MRI and breast ultrasound exams.
“FDA-cleared AI algorithms have also been developed to aid in the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; DEN1700, RRID:SCR_012945) and breast ultrasound exams (K190442, K210670, P150043 RRID:SCR_012945).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites DEN1700
Not checked in the free run.
- cites K190442
Not checked in the free run.
- cites K210670
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
AI for breast cancer detection in X-ray mammography is one of the most active areas of development and clinical translation.
“the use of AI for breast cancer detection in X-ray mammography is one of the most active areas of development and clinical translation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A subsequent study reported an AI approach covering 2D and 3D mammography that detected breast cancer 1 to 2 years earlier than standard radiographic review in some cases.
“A subsequent study presented an AI approach that encompasses both 2D and 3D mammography, with evidence of detecting breast cancer 1 to 2 years earlier than standard radiographic review for some cases (10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Lotter, 2021, Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several studies have examined AI for predicting future breast cancer risk.
“Several studies have also examined the use of AI to predict future breast cancer risk.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Premisecitation
A 2020 Google-led study reported evidence of expert-level breast cancer detection by an AI system.
“A later study led by Google in 2020 garnered much attention in reporting evidence of expertlevel breast cancer detection by an AI system (9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] McKinney, 2020, International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
AI is being applied across the cancer care continuum using different types of data.
“AI is being heavily applied all along the cancer care continuum using different types of data (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The Digital Mammography DREAM Challenge was an early catalyst in AI for breast cancer detection, allowing groups to benchmark and compare approaches.
“An early catalyst in this space was the Digital Mammography DREAM Challenge, an open AI competition where groups were able to benchmark and compare different AI approaches (8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Schaffter, 2020, Evaluation of combined artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment to interpret screening mammograms, JAMA Netw Open source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Raciti and colleagues reported Paige Prostate Alpha, a commercial decision support system trained to detect prostate cancer from core-needle biopsies.
“Raciti and colleagues (60) reported on Paige Prostate Alpha, a commercial decision support system trained to detect prostate cancer from core-needle biopsies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Raciti, 2020, Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies, Mod Pathol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Deep learning has been applied extensively to colonoscopy images and video for colorectal cancer screening.
“In the context of colorectal cancer screening, deep learning has been applied extensively to colonoscopy images and video.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Multiple randomized controlled trials of AI polyp detection in colonoscopy have reported promising results.
“multiple randomized controlled trials have also reported promising results (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] Wang, 2020, Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Repici, 2020, Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial, Gastroenterology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Karsenti, 2023, Effect of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal adenoma in routine colonoscopy (COLO-GENIUS): a single-centre randomised controlled trial, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Wang and colleagues developed DeepGrade, a deep learning model aiming to improve on the Nottingham grading system.
“Wang and colleagues (58) have developed DeepGrade, a deep learning model that aims to improve on the Nottingham grading system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Wang, 2022, Improved breast cancer histological grading using deep learning, Ann Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Multiple groups have reported Gleason scoring predictions from prostate cancer H&E images.
“multiple groups have reported on Gleason scoring predictions from prostate cancer H&E images (62)(63)(64).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [62] Nagpal, 2019, Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer, NPJ Digit Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [63] Bulten, 2020, Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study, Lancet Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] Ström, 2020, Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study, Lancet Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In CAMELYON, many models performed better than a reference panel of pathologists working under time constraints designed to mimic routine workflows.
“This evaluation includes comparison with a reference panel of pathologists working on the same data set with predefined time constraints designed to mimic routine pathology workflows, where many of the models in the challenge exhibited higher performance than the panel of pathologists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Ehteshami Bejnordi, 2017, Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI is used to guide prostate biopsies through prostate segmentation and quantitative feature extraction on MRI.
“AI is being used to guide biopsies themselves through prostate segmentation and quantitative feature extraction on MRI images (K193283, RRID:SCR_012945).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites K193283
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Hamm and colleagues presented an explainable AI model that outputs predictions in terms of PI-RADS criteria.
“Hamm and colleagues (38) presented an explainable AI model that goes beyond classification to output AI predictions in terms of PI-RADS criteria (39)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Hamm, 2023, Interactive explainable deep learning model informs prostate cancer diagnosis at MRI, Radiology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Turkbey, 2019, Prostate imaging reporting and data system Version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2, Eur Urol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Challa and colleagues evaluated the Visiopharm Integrator System metastasis AI algorithm in pathology workflows in a retrospective study at Ohio State University with promising results.
“Challa and colleagues (47) evaluated the Visiopharm Integrator System metastasis AI algorithm in pathology workflows in a retrospective study at Ohio State University with promising results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Challa, 2023, Artificial Intelligence-aided diagnosis of breast cancer lymph node metastasis on histologic slides in a digital workflow, Mod Pathol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Zhou and colleagues reported CRCNet, a deep learning model for detecting colorectal cancer in endoscopy images, with high performance across three independent datasets.
“Zhou and colleagues (15) have reported on CRCNet, a deep learning model for detecting the presence of colorectal cancer within endoscopy images, with reported high performance across three independent data sets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Zhou, 2020, Diagnostic evaluation of a deep learning model for optical diagnosis of colorectal cancer, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CE-marked products exist for quantifying estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, and Ki-67 status from digital pathology images.
“CEmarked products exist for quantifying estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67 status from digital pathology images (55-57).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [55] Aiforia Clinical Suite.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] Mindpeak Solutions
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] Panakeia Products
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several studies have shown potential for AI to facilitate intraoperative cancer diagnosis using label-free and cryosectioned tissue samples.
“several studies have demonstrated the potential of using AI to facilitate intraoperative diagnosis (e.g., during surgical resection) using label-free (40,41) and cryosectioned (42,43) tissue samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [40] You, 2019, Real-time intraoperative diagnosis by deep neural network driven multiphoton virtual histology, NPJ Precis Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Hollon, 2020, Near real-time intraoperative brain tumor diagnosis using stimulated Raman histology and deep neural networks, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Nasrallah, 2023, Machine learning for cryosection pathology predicts the 2021 WHO classification of glioma, Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Ozyoruk, 2022, A deep-learning model for transforming the style of tissue images from cryosectioned to formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded, Nat Biomed Eng source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The National Lung Cancer Screening Trial has become a key public data resource for machine learning research.
“including the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST), which has become a key public data resource for machine learning research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, 2011, Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Field, 2021, Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening: UKLS randomised trial results and international meta-analysis, Lancet Reg Health Eur source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several clinical studies reported increased adenoma detection rate with AI, a central criterion for colonoscopy effectiveness.
“Several of the clinical studies have reported an increased adenoma detection rate with AI, a central criterion in evaluating the effectiveness of colonoscopy procedures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Multiple academic groups and companies have developed AI models for prostate cancer diagnosis and grading from H&E images.
“Multiple academic groups and companies have developed AI models for prostate cancer diagnosis and grading from H&E images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
AI risk prediction algorithms have outperformed traditional breast cancer risk models.
“These AI risk prediction algorithms have been shown to outperform traditional risk models (13,14)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Arasu, 2023, Comparison of mammography AI algorithms with a clinical risk model for 5-year breast cancer risk prediction: an observational study, Radiology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Eriksson, 2023, Long-term performance of an image-based short-term risk model for breast cancer, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Multiple companies have received FDA clearance or EU certification for computer-aided detection systems that identify polyps from colonoscopy images.
“Multiple companies have received FDA clearance or EU certification for computer-aided detection (CADe) systems in identifying polyps from colonoscopy images (K211951, K223473 RRID:SCR_012945)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites K211951
Not checked in the free run.
- cites K223473
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Current U.S. and European guidelines recommend MRI before biopsy for prostate cancer detection.
“Current U.S. and European guidelines recommend prostate cancer detection via MRI prior to biopsy (33,34).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] European Association of Urology. Guidelines on prostate cancer—diagnostic evaluation
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] American College of Radiology. Prostate MRI model policy
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A Siemens commercial prototype increased diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer in a retrospective reader study with seven radiologists.
“a commercial prototype from Siemens was shown to increase the diagnostic accuracy of clinically significant prostate cancer in a retrospective reader study involving seven radiologists (37).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Winkel, 2021, A novel deep learning based computer-aided diagnosis system improves the accuracy and efficiency of radiologists in reading biparametric magnetic resonance images of the prostate: results of a multireader, multicase study, Invest Radiol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Multiple groups have used NLST imaging data to develop lung cancer detection models.
“Multiple groups have now leveraged NLST imaging data to develop lung cancer detection models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Multiple commercial platforms for breast cancer lymph node metastasis detection are clinically available or in development.
“Multiple commercial platforms for breast cancer lymph node metastasis are also clinically available or in development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Most of those studies also found increased detection of diminutive adenomas (≤5 mm), which are very rarely malignant.
“However, most of these same studies also found an increased detection rate of diminutive adenomas (defined as polyps ≤5 mm in size), which are very rarely malignant (23,24).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Ahmad, 2020, Deep learning for colorectal polyp detection: time for clinical implementation?, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Misawa, 2023, Computer-aided detection in real-world colonoscopy: enhancing detection or offering false hope?, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Nam and colleagues reported from a single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial that an AI-based chest X-ray system improved detection of actionable lung nodules compared with non-AI.
“Nam and colleagues (31) have published promising results from a singlecenter, open-label randomized control trial that utilized an AI-based system for chest X-rays from the company Lunit, and reported that the AI arm had an improved detection rate of actionable nodules compared with the non-AI arm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Nam, 2023, AI improves nodule detection on chest radiographs in a health screening population: a randomized controlled trial, Radiology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
You and colleagues presented an approach combining intraoperative microscopy with deep learning to classify malignant versus benign breast tissue.
“You and colleagues (40) have presented an approach that combines intraoperative microscopy with a deep learning model to classify malignant versus benign breast tissue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] You, 2019, Real-time intraoperative diagnosis by deep neural network driven multiphoton virtual histology, NPJ Precis Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Increasing efforts use digital pathology images to guide treatment selection by predicting prognosis and/or existing treatment biomarkers with AI.
“there are increasing efforts of using digital pathology images to guide treatment selection by predicting patient prognosis (73)(74)(75) and/or existing treatment biomarkers (76-79) using AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [73] Mobadersany, 2018, Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [74] Chen, 2021, Multimodal co-attention transformer for survival prediction in gigapixel whole slide images
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [75] Chen, 2022, Pan-cancer integrative histology-genomic analysis via multimodal deep learning, Cancer Cell source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
DoMore Diagnostics has a CE-marked product that predicts colorectal cancer prognosis from H&E slides.
“DoMore Diagnostics has a CE-marked product that predicts colorectal cancer prognosis from H&E slides (94).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] DoMore Diagnostics: Histotype Px Colorectal
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
The poor prognosis of NSCLC and variable success of immunotherapies have motivated many efforts to use AI to predict prognosis, treatment response, and existing biomarkers.
“The relatively poor prognosis of NSCLC and the variable success of immunotherapies for NSCLC have motivated many efforts in using AI to predict prognosis, treatment response, and existing biomarkers for these patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Lu and colleagues used a weakly supervised deep learning method called CLAM to predict subtypes in renal cell carcinoma and NSCLC.
“Lu and colleagues (69) used a weakly supervised deep learning method-dubbed clustering-constrained-attention multiple-instance learning (CLAM)-to predict subtypes in renal cell carcinoma and NSCLC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Lu, 2021, Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images, Nat Biomed Eng source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Vanguri and colleagues demonstrated that a multimodal model including CT images, digitized PD-L1 IHC slides, and molecular alteration data performed significantly better than unimodal models in predicting immunotherapy response in NSCLC.
“Vanguri and colleagues (108) demonstrated that a multimodal model that included CT images, digitized PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides, and molecular alteration data performed significantly better than unimodal models in predicting response to immunotherapy in NSCLC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] Vanguri, 2022, Multimodal integration of radiology, pathology and genomics for prediction of response to PD-(L)1 blockade in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, Nat Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several studies have used AI to predict previously identified prognostic or predictive biomarkers in colorectal cancer.
“Along with directly predicting prognosis, there have been several studies using AI to predict previously identified prognostic/predictive biomarkers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Ogier du Terrail and colleagues presented a federated learning approach for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.
“A recent study by Ogier du Terrail and colleagues (83) presented a federated learning approach for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] Ogier du Terrail, 2023, Federated learning for predicting histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several CE-marked products exist for Gleason grading.
“There are now several CE-marked products for Gleason grading (55,65,66).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [55] Aiforia Clinical Suite.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [65] Ibex: Galen Prostate
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [66] Indica Labs: HALO Prostate AI.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Prognostic AI models for colorectal cancer have been developed for MRI, histopathology, and multiplex imaging.
“Prognostic AI models for colorectal cancer have been developed for various data modalities, including MRI (88), histopathology (89-91), and multiplex imaging (92,93).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [88] Jiang, 2023, An MRI deep learning model predicts outcome in rectal cancer, Radiology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [89] Wulczyn, 2021, Interpretable survival prediction for colorectal cancer using deep learning, NPJ Digit Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [90] Kather, 2019, Predicting survival from colorectal cancer histology slides using deep learning: a retrospective multicenter study, PLOS Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [91] Bychkov, 2018, Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer, Sci Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [92] Wu, 2022, Graph deep learning for the characterization of tumour microenvironments from spatial protein profiles in tissue specimens, Nat Biomed Eng source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [93] Foersch, 2023, Multistain deep learning for prediction of prognosis and therapy response in colorectal cancer, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Numerous studies have demonstrated potential for AI to predict immunotherapy biomarkers from H&E images of NSCLC, including TMB, PD-L1 expression, and TILs.
“Numerous studies have demonstrated the potential for using AI to predict immunotherapy biomarkers from H&E images of patients with NSCLC, including tumor mutation burden (TMB; ref. 76), PD-L1 expression (105), and TILs (106, 107).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [76] Jain, 2020, Predicting tumour mutational burden from histopathological images using multiscale deep learning, Nat Mach Intell source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [105] Sha, 2019, Multi-field-of-view deep learning model predicts non–small cell lung cancer programmed death-ligand 1 status from whole-slide hematoxylin and eosin images, J Pathol Inform source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [106] Park, 2022, Artificial intelligence-powered spatial analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as complementary biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [107] Rakaee, 2023, Association of machine learning-based assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on standard histologic images with outcomes of immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC, JAMA Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The ArteraAI Prostate Test is clinically available through a CLIA-certified laboratory.
“This technology has been commercialized as the ArteraAI Prostate Test, which is now clinically available through a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory (115).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A line of work has focused on developing and validating AI for predicting microsatellite instability, a feature associated with clinical outcomes and a biomarker for immunotherapy.
“a line of work (97-99) has focused on developing and validating AI for predicting microsatellite instability (MSI), a feature associated with clinical outcomes and a biomarker for immunotherapy (100).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [97] Echle, 2022, Artificial intelligence for detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer—a multicentric analysis of a pre-screening tool for clinical application, ESMO Open source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [98] Echle, 2020, Clinical-grade detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal tumors by deep learning, Gastroenterology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [99] Kather, 2019, Deep learning can predict microsatellite instability directly from histology in gastrointestinal cancer, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [100] Li, 2020, Microsatellite instability: a review of what the oncologist should know, Cancer Cell Int source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Other efforts have used AI on H&E images to predict TIL presence and PD-L1 expression status in breast cancer.
“Other efforts have used AI on H&E images to directly predict TIL presence (85,86), a notable prognostic and predictive biomarker in breast cancer, and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status, a predictive biomarker for immunotherapies (87).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [85] Saltz, 2018, Spatial organization and molecular correlation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes using deep learning on pathology images, Cell Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [86] Binder, 2021, Morphological and molecular breast cancer profiling through explainable machine learning, Nat Mach Intell source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [87] Shamai, 2022, Deep learning-based image analysis predicts PD-L1 status from H&E-stained histopathology images in breast cancer, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Korbar and colleagues developed a deep learning model to classify colorectal polyps into one of five common types based on H&E whole slide images.
“Korbar and colleagues (72) developed a deep learning model to classify colorectal polyps into one of five common types based on H&E whole slide images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Korbar, 2017, Deep learning for classification of colorectal polyps on whole-slide images, J Pathol Inform source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Kartasalo and colleagues developed an AI model using H&E images to detect perineural invasion, a key prognostic marker associated with poor outcomes in prostate cancer.
“Kartasalo and colleagues (67) have developed an AI model using H&E images to detect perineural invasion-a key prognostic marker associated with poor outcomes in prostate cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Kartasalo, 2022, Detection of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies with deep neural networks, Virchows Arch source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Owkin has a CE-marked product to predict MSI from H&E images.
“This application is beginning to be commercialized, such as the CE-marked product (101) developed by Owkin to predict MSI from H&E images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] Owkin: MSIntuit CRC | AI Cancer Testing
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ozyoruk and colleagues demonstrated potential for AI to facilitate intraoperative subtyping of NSCLC by transforming cryosectioned tissue slides into the style of standard FFPE slides.
“Ozyoruk and colleagues (43) also demonstrated the potential of using AI to facilitate intraoperative subtyping of NSCLC by transforming cryosectioned tissue slides into the style of standard formalin-fixed and paraffinembedded slides.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Ozyoruk, 2022, A deep-learning model for transforming the style of tissue images from cryosectioned to formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded, Nat Biomed Eng source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
ArteraAI developed and tested a multimodal AI approach using histology images and clinical data to predict prostate cancer prognosis.
“AI company ArteraAI has developed and tested a multimodal AI approach (113, 114) that uses histology images and clinical data to predict prostate cancer prognosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [113] Esteva, 2022, Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials, NPJ Digit Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [114] Spratt, 2023, Artificial intelligence predictive model for hormone therapy use in prostate cancer, NEJM Evid source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Histopathologic classification studies have been reported in colorectal cancer.
“Histopathologic classification studies have been reported in colorectal cancer (70,71).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] Shaban, 2020, Context-aware convolutional neural network for grading of colorectal cancer histology images, IEEE Trans Med Imaging source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [71] Yu, 2021, Accurate recognition of colorectal cancer with semi-supervised deep learning on pathological images, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Efforts are under way to use AI to improve prostate cancer prognostication.
“Efforts are also under way to use AI to improve prostate cancer prognostication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Deep learning methods are having an impact on emerging novel therapeutic approaches involving molecular oncology.
“Deep learning methods are also having an impact on emerging novel therapeutic approaches involving molecular oncology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Robust, generalizable AI models require large training datasets, ideally from multiple independent sources.
“Robust, generalizable AI models require vast amounts of training data, ideally sourced from multiple, independent sources (160).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160] Sheller, 2020, Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data, Sci Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Deep learning for automatic contouring of Organs at Risk in CT, PET-CT, and MRI is a particularly clinically advanced area of radiotherapy AI.
“Of these, a particularly clinically advanced area is the use of deep learning to automatically contour Organs at Risk within clinical images such as CT, positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT), and MRI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
AI is used in nearly every step of next-generation sequencing processing and interpretation, including mutation identification, artifact filtering, and driver gene identification.
“This includes the use of AI in nearly every step of next-generation sequencing (NGS) processing and interpretation, including mutation identification (122, 123), artifact filtering (124), and driver gene identification (125).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [122] Khazeeva, 2022, DeNovoCNN: a deep learning approach to de novo variant calling in next-generation sequencing data, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [123] Sahraeian, 2022, Achieving robust somatic mutation detection with deep learning models derived from reference data sets of a cancer sample, Genome Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [124] Jongbloed, 2023, Machine learning-based somatic variant calling in cell-free DNA of metastatic breast cancer patients using large NGS panels, Sci Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [125] Luo, 2019, Predicting cancer driver genes based on somatic mutations using deep convolutional neural networks, Front Genet source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several companies have developed AI-assisted scribing technologies that generate documentation from transcriptions of a clinical encounter.
“Several companies have developed AI-assisted scribing technologies to generate documentation based on transcriptions of a clinical encounter (155, 156).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [155] DeepScribe: AI-powered medical scribe
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [156] Nuance Communications: ambient clinical intelligence | automatically document care
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
For rare cancers, because individual sites may treat few patients, multisite data integration is necessary to produce meaningful scientific or clinical insights.
“It is even more acutely important for rare cancers, where individual sites may only treat a small number of such patients, and multisite data integration is necessary to establish meaningful scientific or clinical insights (161).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161] Pati, 2022, Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lu and colleagues demonstrated potential for AI to predict tumor origin from routine histology slides.
“A study by Lu and colleagues (138) has also demonstrated the potential of using AI to predict tumor origin from routine histology slides.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [138] Lu, 2021, AI-based pathology predicts origins for cancers of unknown primary, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Multiple non-deep learning clinical trial matching applications exist.
“Multiple non-deep learning clinical trial matching applications now exist.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Documentation and coding requirements in modern electronic medical records impose a significant time burden on clinicians.
“Documentation and coding requirements in modern EMRs are extensive, imposing a significant time burden on clinicians (153)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [153] Arndt, 2017, Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations, Ann Fam Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Multiple AI methods have been developed to predict cell of origin.
“Multiple AI methods have been developed to perform these predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
ChatGPT performed well at answering questions about cancer myths and misconceptions.
“ChatGPT was shown to exhibit good performance at answering questions about cancer myths and misconceptions (159).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [159] Johnson, 2023, Using ChatGPT to evaluate cancer myths and misconceptions: artificial intelligence and cancer information, JNCI Cancer Spectr source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Multiple companies have received FDA clearances and/or EU certification for AI autocontouring approaches.
“Multiple companies have now received FDA clearances and/or EU certification for these approaches (K201232, K223774, K211881 RRID:SCR_012945).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites K201232
Not checked in the free run.
- cites K223774
Not checked in the free run.
- cites K211881
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Centralized learning, in which sites transfer data to a central secure enclave after legal agreements and security protocols, is the standard default approach in most commercial and academic AI efforts to date.
“This is the standard, default approach used in most commercial and academic AI efforts to date.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161] Pati, 2022, Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Clinical trial matching is usually framed as a natural language processing challenge in which patient medical records, usually unstructured clinical notes, are matched against inclusion and exclusion criteria.
“clinical trial matching is usually framed as a natural language processing (NLP) challenge, where patient medical records-usually only available as unstructured clinical notes-are matched against inclusion and exclusion clinical trial criteria (148).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [148] von Itzstein, 2021, Application of information technology to clinical trial evaluation and enrollment: a review, JAMA Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many patients with advanced cancer do not fully understand that their treatment is palliative.
“Many patients with advanced cancer, for example, do not fully grasp the palliative intent of their treatment (158).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [158] Weeks, 2012, Patients’ expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Documentation and coding requirements in modern electronic medical records contribute to clinician burnout.
“and contributing to burnout (154)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [154] Robertson, 2017, Electronic health record effects on work-life balance and burnout within the i3 population collaborative, J Grad Med Educ source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Large language models offer a renewed opportunity to improve NLP-based clinical trial matching.
“The advent of LLMs now offers a renewed opportunity to improve NLP trial matching.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Large language models show promise for clinical decision support in oncology.
“Overall, these recent endeavors suggest that LLMs offer promising applications for clinical decision support in oncology”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Ensuring fairness in AI performance and use across populations is an overarching challenge in AI in medicine.
“An overarching challenge in AI in medicine is ensuring fairness in performance and use across populations (173).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] Chen, 2023, Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare, Nat Biomed Eng source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
The US follows a centralized medical device regulation model overseen by the FDA.
“The United States currently follows a centralized model of medical device regulation, overseen by the FDA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Pati and colleagues used federated learning across 71 sites to predict tumor boundaries in multiparametric MRI scans of glioblastoma patients.
“A study by Pati and colleagues (161) also used FL across 71 sites to predict tumor boundaries within multiparametric MRI scans of glioblastoma patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161] Pati, 2022, Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Multiple clinical trials in AI oncology have published results in the past two years, such as those in breast cancer and colorectal screening.
“Multiple clinical trials have now also published results in the past two years, such as those described in the breast cancer and colorectal screening sections above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
AI offers opportunities to mitigate healthcare disparities that are already known to exist.
“Conversely, AI offers opportunities to mitigate healthcare disparities that are already known to exist (174, 175).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
There are increasing efforts to build domain-specific foundation models for healthcare, including pathology.
“Beyond using general-purpose foundation models like GPT-4, there are increasing efforts in building domain-specific foundation models for healthcare (171), including pathology (ref.172; arXiv:2309.07778 and arXiv:2307.12914).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [171] Moor, 2023, Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [172] Huang, 2023, A visual–language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical Twitter, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites arXiv:2309.07778
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
There is a lack of up-to-date, frequently refreshing databases focused on AI devices and their specific characteristics.
“One challenge in monitoring the progress of regulatory clearances is the lack of up-to-date, frequently refreshing databases focused on AI devices and their specific characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The FDA has released a list of AI-enabled devices yearly for the last few years.
“The FDA has released a list of AI-enabled devices (193) on a yearly basis for the last few years, which is very valuable for the field, yet the rapid progress and value of aggregating more detailed characteristics creates a strong need for complementary solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [193] FDA. Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled medical devices
Not checked in the free run.
- Premiseown data
These trials include AI-based chatbots, such as for genetic counseling.
“These include trials involving AI-based chatbots, such as use in genetic counseling (NCT05562778, NCT04354675 RRID:SCR_002309).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NCT05562778
Not checked in the free run.
- cites NCT04354675
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The FDA is developing a Predetermined Change Control Plan pathway to allow AI updates in a device without resubmission.
“To this end, the U.S. FDA is developing a pathway for a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [189] FDA. marketing submission recommendations for a predetermined change control plan for artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML): enabled device software functions: draft guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The EU AI Act will require device manufacturers to document their strategy for modifying and subsequently testing and validating AI medical devices.
“Similarly, the EU AI Act will require device manufactures to document their strategy for modifying and subsequently testing and validating AI medical devices (190).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [190] Vokinger, 2021, Regulating AI in medicine in the United States and Europe, Nat Mach Intell source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Most AI approaches described in the paper have been unimodal, such as making predictions from a medical image alone.
“The majority of AI approaches described above have been unimodal, such as making predictions from a medical image alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Chen and colleagues developed an approach that fuses genomic data and histopathology images to predict survival in a pan-cancer cohort.
“For instance, Chen and colleagues (75) developed an approach to fuse genomic data and histopathology images to predict survival in a pan-cancer cohort.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Chen, 2022, Pan-cancer integrative histology-genomic analysis via multimodal deep learning, Cancer Cell source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Diversity of public datasets is a challenge across other oncology applications, including popular genomics datasets such as TCGA and GENIE.
“The diversity of public data sets is a challenge across other oncology applications, including popular genomics data sets, such as TCGA (181) and GENIE (182).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisenone given
Oncologists rely on the totality of patient information, including radiology images, pathology images, lab values, genomic data, family history, and prior clinical notes, to provide optimal care.
“However, oncologists rely on the totality of information regarding a patient-including radiology images, pathology images, lab values, genomic data, family history, and prior clinical notes-to provide optimal care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Boehm and colleagues used TCGA and an internal cohort to fuse genomic data, histopathology imaging, and radiology imaging to predict survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
“Boehm and colleagues (170) used TCGA and an internal cohort to fuse genomic data, histopathology imaging, and radiology imaging to predict survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [170] Boehm, 2022, Multimodal data integration using machine learning improves risk stratification of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, Nat Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Muehlematter and colleagues surveyed all approved AI medical devices in the US and EU from 2015 to 2020 and found that a majority were radiology focused.
“Muehlematter and colleagues (195) surveyed all approved AI medical devices in both the United States and the EU for the period 2015 to 2020 and also found that a majority of approved devices in both the United States and the EU were radiology focused.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [195] Muehlematter, 2021, Approval of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices in the USA and Europe (2015–20): a comparative analysis, Lancet Digit Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The FDA regulates AI applications under Software as a Medical Device with processes similar to other SaMD and non-AI algorithms.
“The FDA regulates AI applications under the umbrella of Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) with similar regulatory processes as other SaMD devices and non-AI algorithms (187).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [187] Harvey, 2020, How the FDA regulates AI, Acad Radiol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
ArteraAI developed a clinically available laboratory-developed test that predicts prostate cancer prognosis by integrating digital pathology images with clinical metadata.
“Additionally, ArteraAI has developed a clinically available laboratory-developed test to predict prostate cancer prognosis by integrating digital pathology images with clinical metadata (115).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lack of reimbursement makes it challenging to assess the true extent of clinical integration, because traditional methods such as insurance claims data cannot be used except for a small number of applications.
“This lack of reimbursement also makes it challenging to assess the true extent of clinical integration, as traditional methods for measuring medical device use such as insurance claims data cannot be used except for a small number of applications (211).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [211] Wu, 2023, Characterizing the clinical adoption of medical AI devices through U.S. insurance claims, NEJM AI source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
There is a growing number of AI orchestration platforms that act as an intermediary between clinical systems and AI algorithms.
“In particular, there is a growing number of AI”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
There are ongoing efforts to provide more structured explainability, such as representing AI predictions in terms of human-interpretable concepts and language-based explanations.
“There are ongoing efforts to provide more structured explainability, such as representing AI predictions in terms of human-interpretable concepts (205-207) and language-based explanations (medRxiv 2023.06.07.23291119; refs.208, 209).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [205] Kim, 2018, Interpretability beyond feature attribution: quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (TCAV)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [206] Koh, 2020, Concept bottleneck models.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [207] Yuksekgonul, 2023, Post-hoc concept bottleneck models. In:
Not checked in the free run.
- cites medRxiv 2023.06.07.23291119
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [208] Agarwal, 2023, Representing visual classification as a linear combination of words
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The EQUATOR Network provides a growing set of reporting guidelines specific to AI in healthcare and oncology.
“The EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network currently provides a growing set of reporting guidelines specific to AI in healthcare and oncology (197).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [197] Simera, 2010, Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network, BMC Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Explainability is an often-cited challenge for black-box AI models.
“To this end, explainability is an often-cited challenge for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [203] Rudin, 2019, Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high-stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead, Nat Mach Intell source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [204] van der Velden, 2022, Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis, Med Image Anal source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Rather than each AI application interfacing separately with clinical systems, orchestration platforms such as those from Nvidia and CARPL serve as a single interface and orchestrate multiple AI algorithms based on rule-based logic.
“Rather than having each AI application interface separately with clinical systems, these platforms, such as those developed by Nvidia (212) and CARPL (213), serve as a single interface and orchestrate the execution of multiple AI algorithms based on rule-based logic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [212] NVIDIA Clara supercharges next gen medical devices
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [213] CARPL Platform
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A recent report indicates that the scope of explainability offered in FDA-cleared devices for medical imaging is often limited.
“with a recent report indicating that the scope of explainability offered in FDA-cleared devices for medical imaging is often limited (medRxiv 2023.11.28.23299132).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites medRxiv 2023.11.28.23299132
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 82
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 52
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA ClinicalTrials.gov search for cancer and artificial intelligence at the time of writing found 526 studies, 81 of which were interventional and actively recruiting.
“A search of ClinicalTrials.gov of”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe digitalization of oncology, including electronic medical records, radiology and pathology imaging, and routine genomic profiling, is advancing but is uneven across data types and clinical sites.
“This includes the storage of patient data in electronic medical record (EMR) systems, the digitization of radiology and pathology imaging (3), and the increasing adoption of routine genomic profiling (4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationBreast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers accounted for 50% of all new cancer cases in 2023.
“the review focuses on the four most common cancer types: breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal, accounting for 50% of all new cancer cases in 2023 (7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER): cancer stat facts: common cancer sites
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAI is being applied with increasing frequency across all areas of oncology.
“Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied to all aspects of oncology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeep learning advances over the past decade have made it possible to learn complex patterns directly from real-world data, and this has been a main driver of AI progress in healthcare and elsewhere.
“In particular, advances in deep learning (1) over the past decade have made it feasible to learn complex patterns directly from real-world data, making it the core driver of AI advances in and out of healthcare (2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMultiple commercial AI devices for breast cancer detection in mammography have received FDA clearance and/or EU certification to aid radiologists.
“In the case of mammography, there are now multiple commercial AI devices cleared by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Union (EU) that are designed to aid radiologists in breast cancer detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMultiple FDA-cleared and/or EU-certified commercial AI devices exist in cancer detection, and multiple clinical trials have been reported.
“Although not yet uniformly adopted across imaging providers or cancer hospitals, there are multiple FDAcleared and/or EU-certified commercial devices in the cancer detection domain and multiple reported clinical trials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMultiple clinical trials are evaluating the real-world effectiveness of AI systems for breast cancer detection in mammography.
“There are also multiple ongoing clinical trials evaluating the real-world effectiveness of such systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Mirai system predicts 5-year breast cancer risk directly from mammograms and has been retrospectively evaluated across multiple hospitals.
“the Mirai system developed by Yala and colleagues ( 12) is designed to predict 5-year cancer risk directly from mammograms and has been retrospectively evaluated across multiple hospitals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Yala, 2022, Multi-institutional validation of a mammography-based breast cancer risk model, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncreasing availability of detailed longitudinal cancer patient data can be used to train AI models, and real-time access to such data can enable individualized clinically relevant predictions for precision oncology.
“These data can be used to build and train AI models, and critically, the real-time availability of these data can enable individualized, clinically relevant AI predictions to further the goal of precision oncology (5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Garraway, 2013, Precision oncology: an overview, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI applications for breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers are a good representation of the current state of the field because their prevalence supports large-scale data collection and encourages clinical application.
“AI applications for these cancer types serve as a good representation of the current state of the field, especially as their prevalence facilitates large-scale data collection and encourages clinical application.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA longer-term prospective trial is assessing the link between colonoscopy CADe systems and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after 10-year follow-up.
“a longer-term, prospective clinical trial is now seeking to assess the connection between colonoscopy CADe systems and incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer after a 10-year follow-up period (25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Mori, 2022, Clinical trial designs for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGroups have reported deep learning for breast cancer diagnosis and subtyping from H&E slides and for quantifying features such as mitotic cell counting.
“groups have reported on the use of deep learning for breast cancer diagnosis and subtyping from H&E slides (49)(50)(51), and quantifying other clinically relevant features such as mitotic cell counting (52,53).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [49] Sui, 2021, A pyramid architecture-based deep learning framework for breast cancer detection, BioMed Res Int source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Sandbank, 2022, Validation and real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence algorithm for breast cancer detection in biopsies, NPJ Breast Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51] Couture, 2018, Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype, NPJ Breast Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningCAMELYON16/17 data have become a standard benchmark for deep learning models in pathology.
“The CAMELYON16/17 data have subsequently become a standard benchmark for deep learning models in pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a retrospective study, pathologists using Paige Prostate Alpha had improved sensitivity for prostate cancer diagnosis, reduced review time, and no statistically significant change in specificity.
“In a retrospective study, pathologists demonstrated improved sensitivity in diagnosing prostate cancer when using the AI platform, along with a reduction in review time and no statistically significant change in specificity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Raciti, 2020, Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies, Mod Pathol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSince 2013, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has recommended low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in high-risk populations.
“Since 2013, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has recommended low-dose computed tomography to screen for lung cancer in high-risk populations (26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021, Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPaige has received FDA Breakthrough Device Designation for Paige Lymph Node, providing a path for accelerated FDA clearance.
“The AI company Paige has also recently been granted FDA Breakthrough Device Designation status for Paige Lymph Node, providing a path for accelerated FDA clearance (48).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] U.S. FDA grants Paige breakthrough device designation for cancer detection in breast lymph nodes
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany AI efforts in prostate cancer aim to classify clinically significant disease and quantify features such as prostate gland segmentation and volume.
“There have been many AI efforts in this domain, including those aimed at directly classifying clinically significant prostate cancer and approaches to quantify clinically relevant features such as segmenting and measuring the volume of the prostate gland (35).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Li, 2022, Machine learning in prostate MRI for prostate cancer: current status and future opportunities, Diagnostics source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPaige Prostate Alpha was validated in an external cohort and cleared by the FDA.
“The platform was subsequently validated in an external cohort (61) and eventually cleared by the FDA (DEN200080, RRID:SCR_012945).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [61] da Silva, 2021, Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system, J Pathol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites DEN200080
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGoogle developed LYNA and reported that pathologists using it detected significantly more micrometastases with shorter review time.
“Google developed LYmph Node Assistant (LYNA; ref. 46) and reported that pathologists who used the system were able to detect significantly more micrometastases with shorter review time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Steiner, 2018, Impact of deep learning assistance on the histopathologic review of lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer, Am J Surg Pathol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTreatment decisions in breast cancer often depend on detecting sentinel lymph node metastases, but pathology review is labor intensive and has significant interreader variability.
“Treatment decisions in breast cancer frequently hinge on the detection of such lesions (44), but pathology review remains labor intensive and subject to significant interreader variability (arXiv:1703.02442).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [44] Giuliano, 2018, Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer, Ann Surg Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites arXiv:1703.02442
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSandbank and colleagues presented a deep learning model that classifies invasive and noninvasive breast cancer subtypes and generates 51 predicted clinical and morphologic features.
“Sandbank and colleagues (50) have recently presented a deep learning model for classifying invasive and noninvasive breast cancer subtypes and generating 51 predicted clinical and morphologic features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] Sandbank, 2022, Validation and real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence algorithm for breast cancer detection in biopsies, NPJ Breast Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAI has been applied to histopathologic tasks of cancer subtype, grade, and stage classification, but these applications are generally further from clinical adoption and have fewer FDA/EU clearances than imaging-based detection.
“AI has been applied to each of these tasks, though these applications are generally further from clinical adoption with fewer FDA or EU clearances than the imaging-based detection applications described above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationArdila and colleagues developed an approach to localize lung nodules and predict malignancy likelihood; the model is now licensed by Aidence.
“Ardila and colleagues (29) developed an approach to localize lung nodules and predict their likelihood of malignancy, where this model is now licensed by the AI company Aidence (30).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Ardila, 2019, End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] 2022, Aidence and Google Health enter into collaboration to help improve lung cancer screening with AI
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe PI-CAI challenge provides a multicenter, multivendor dataset of 1,500 prostate MRI exams for training AI models.
“the Prostate Imaging-Cancer AI (PI-CAI) challenge enables participants to train on a multicenter, multivendor data set of 1,500 MRI prostate exams (36).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Sunoqrot, 2022, Artificial intelligence for prostate MRI: open datasets, available applications, and grand challenges, Eur Radiol Exp source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMuch of this work has been integrated into Stratipath, a Swedish AI start-up focused on digital pathology.
“Much of this work has now been integrated into Stratipath (59), a Swedishbased AI start-up focused on digital pathology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Stratipath Breast
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenRadiotherapy is a critical therapeutic approach for multiple cancer types and an intense area of AI research, development, and commercialization.
“Radiotherapy is a critical therapeutic approach for multiple cancer types, and an intense area of AI research, development, and commercialization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese efforts include histology and CT-based models for survival prediction and correlation of CT imaging features with histology risk factors.
“These efforts include histology (102) and CT-based (103) models for survival prediction, and the correlation of CT imaging features with histology risk factors (104).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [102] Yu, 2016, Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [103] Saad, 2023, Predicting benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer by CT-based ensemble deep learning: a retrospective study, Lancet Digit Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [104] Nam, 2022, Histopathologic basis for a chest CT deep learning survival prediction model in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, Radiology source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI is used at all steps of radiotherapy, including image segmentation, treatment planning, outcome prediction, quality assurance, and AI-guided radiosurgery.
“This includes the use of AI at all steps of radiotherapy, including image segmentation, treatment planning, outcome prediction, quality assurance, and AIguided radiosurgery (116).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] Li, 2022, Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy, Semin Cancer Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCE-marked products exist for quantifying PD-L1 expression from IHC slides.
“Additionally, CEmarked products exist for quantifying PD-L1 expression from IHC slides (109-111).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [109] Aiforia achieves CE-IVD mark for clinical PD-L1 AI model in lung cancer diagnostics
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [110] Mindpeak Solutions: plug-and-play AI solution to detect and quantify PD-L1 (SP263) within predefined ROIs in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [111]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral validation studies of histopathology-based prognostic models for colorectal cancer exist, including one showing a prognostic feature previously identified through AI can be learned and used by pathologists.
“There have additionally been several validation studies of histopathology-based prognostic models (95,96), including a study demonstrating that a prognostic feature previously identified through AI analysis can be learned and used by pathologists (95).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [95] L'Imperio, 2023, Pathologist validation of a machine learning–derived feature for colon cancer risk stratification, JAMA Netw Open source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [96] Skrede, 2020, Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study, Lancet Lond Engl source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSome clinically available devices exist for AI-based treatment selection, but they are generally further from clinical maturity than cancer detection and diagnosis tasks.
“Although there are some clinically available devices for these tasks, they tend to be further from clinical maturity than cancer detection and diagnosis tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationNagpal and colleagues used a deep learning model to predict Gleason scores from TCGA H&E images and reported significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than a cohort of 29 board-certified pathologists.
“Nagpal and colleagues (62) used a deep learning model to predict Gleason scores using H&E images from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and reported significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared with a cohort of 29 board-certified pathologists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Nagpal, 2019, Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer, NPJ Digit Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationP-NET is a sparse deep learning model that processes molecular profiling data in a pathway-driven fashion to predict prostate disease states such as metastases, and its prediction scores independently correlate with prognosis.
“P-NET (112) is a sparse deep learning model that processes molecular profiling data in a biologically informed, pathway-driven fashion to predict prostate disease states such as metastases, where the resulting prediction scores were shown to independently correlate with prognosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] Elmarakeby, 2021, Biologically informed deep neural network for prostate cancer discovery, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSignificant efforts have been made to use AI for histopathologic diagnosis in lung and colorectal cancers, but no FDA-cleared devices exist for these tasks at the time of writing.
“Significant efforts have also been made in using AI for histopathologic diagnosis in lung and colorectal cancers, though FDA-cleared devices for these tasks do not exist at the time of writing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThat approach used weakly supervised training to predict response from H&E whole slide images and interpretability methods identified features correlating with higher response predictions, such as TILs and necrosis.
“The approach included weakly supervised training to predict response from H&E whole slide images, with subsequent application of interpretability approaches to identify features that correlate with higher response predictions, such as the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and necrosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] Ogier du Terrail, 2023, Federated learning for predicting histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLarge language models such as BERT, GPT, and ChatGPT are rapidly diffusing into industry, and healthcare-specific models are being developed.
“Models such as BERT (80), GPT (81), and ChatGPT (arXiv:2303.08774)are rapidly diffusing into industry, and healthcare-specific models are also being developed (ref.82; arXiv:2106.03598,arXiv:1904.05342).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [80] Devlin, 2019, Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [81] Brown, 2020, Language models are few-shot learners
Not checked in the free run.
- cites arXiv:2303.08774
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmgad and colleagues used deep learning to extract human-interpretable features and then generated a risk score for breast cancer prognosis.
“Amgad and colleagues (84) explicitly enforce interpretability by using deep learning to extract human-interpretable features, and subsequently use these features to generate a risk score for breast cancer prognosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Amgad, 2024, A population-level digital histologic biomarker for enhanced prognosis of invasive breast cancer, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn an evaluation of four large language models asked to suggest treatment options for fictional advanced cancer patients, the models produced a wider range of options than human experts but their recommendations often disagreed with expert consensus.
“Although the LLMs generated a wider range of treatment options compared with human experts, their recommendations often deviated from expert consensus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] Benary, 2023, Leveraging large language models for decision support in personalized oncology, JAMA Netw Open source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCancerVar is an AI platform that uses deep learning to predict oncogenicity of somatic variants using functional and clinical features and may provide a robust alternative to manually curated databases such as CiVIC and OncoKB.
“CancerVar (131) is an AI platform that uses a deep learning framework to predict the oncogenicity of somatic variants using both functional and clinical features and may provide a robust alternative to manually curated databases, such as CiVIC (132) and OncoKB ( 133).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [131] Li, 2022, CancerVar: an artificial intelligence-empowered platform for clinical interpretation of somatic mutations in cancer, Sci Adv source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [132] Griffith, 2017, CIViC is a community knowledgebase for expert crowdsourcing the clinical interpretation of variants in cancer, Nat Genet source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [133] Chakravarty, 2017, OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base, JCO Precis Oncol
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPersonalized cancer vaccines are being tested in a wide variety of clinical indications, and recent trial data indicate their potential role in combination with existing immune-checkpoint blockade.
“personalized cancer vaccines are being tested in a wide variety of clinical indications, and recent trial data indicate their potential role in combination with existing immune-checkpoint blockade (139).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [139] Khattak, 2023, Abstract CT001: a personalized cancer vaccine, mRNA-4157, combined with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab in patients with resected high-risk melanoma: efficacy and safety results from the randomized, open-label Phase 2 mRNA-4157-P201/Keynote-942 trial, Cancer Res source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationApplied to 37 cancer types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes dataset, Dig identified potential cryptic splice sites, recurrent variants in noncoding regions, and mutations in rarely mutated genes.
“Applied to 37 cancer types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes data set (128), Dig identified several potential cryptic splice sites, recurrent variants in noncoding regions, as well as mutations in rarely mutated genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [128] ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium, 2020, Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI in oncology faces significant challenges in obtaining and sharing robust medical data, protecting patient privacy, and ensuring fairness across all patients.
“These challenges include obtaining and sharing robust medical data, risks to patient privacy, and ensuring fairness in AI performance across all patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI applications are advancing in image-guided radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and surgery.
“AI applications are also now advancing in the fields of image-guided radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (119), and surgery in general, where autocontouring is similarly helpful (120).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA 2022 meta-analysis of 10 published studies across commercial and academic platforms found that most clinical trial matching applications offered comparable or superior performance to manual screening, with dramatic efficiency improvements.
“A 2022 meta-analysis reported on 10 published studies across multiple commercial and academic platforms and found that most applications offered comparable, if not superior performance to manual screening, with dramatic improvements in efficiency (149).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [149] Chow, 2023, Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRadici and colleagues evaluated the FDA-cleared and CE-marked Limbus Contour AI platform for autocontouring at a single European tertiary cancer hospital and found it significantly reduced procedure time and interobserver variability.
“A recent study by Radici and colleagues (117) evaluated the FDAcleared and CE-marked Limbus Contour (LC) AI platform for autocontouring within a single European tertiary cancer hospital and found that the technology significantly reduced the procedure time and interobserver variability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [117] Radici, 2022, Implementation of a commercial deep learning-based auto segmentation software in radiotherapy: evaluation of effectiveness and impact on workflow, Life Basel Switz
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnly 6% of patients with cancer enroll in clinical trials, and race-, sex-, and age-based disparities persist.
“only 6% of patients with cancer enroll in clinical trials (144) and there continue to be race-, sex-, and age-based disparities within clinical trials (145, 146).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [144] Unger, 2021, Nationally representative estimates of the participation of cancer patients in clinical research studies according to the commission on cancer, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [145] Murthy, 2004, Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [146] Kwiatkowski, 2013, Inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials, a decade later: have we improved?, Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTranscriptomic-based algorithms for cell-of-origin prediction have been developed, but they require expansion of clinical transcriptome profiling for generalizability assessments.
“Transcriptomic-based algorithms have also been developed (136, 137), although these approaches will require expansion of clinical transcriptome profiling for assessments of generalizability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [136] Grewal, 2019, Application of a neural network whole transcriptome-based pan-cancer method for diagnosis of primary and metastatic cancers, JAMA Netw Open source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [137] Divate, 2022, Deep learning-based pan-cancer classification model reveals tissue-of-origin specific gene expression signatures, Cancers source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAs more AI models reach the clinic, challenges remain in integrating AI applications into clinical workflows and assessing their ultimate impact on patients and healthcare systems.
“As more AI models reach the clinic, there are also challenges in effectively integrating AI applications into clinical workflows and assessing the ultimate impact on patients and healthcare systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the same evaluation, large language models correctly identified several important treatment strategies and proposed some reasonable options that experts had not readily seen.
“Despite these limitations, LLMs were able to correctly identify several important treatment strategies and even suggested some reasonable options that were not readily apparent to experts (151).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] Benary, 2023, Leveraging large language models for decision support in personalized oncology, JAMA Netw Open source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDig outperformed multiple other methods for driver identification in accuracy and power and ran multiple orders of magnitude faster.
“The method outperformed multiple other methods for driver identification in accuracy and power and ran multiple orders of magnitude faster.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [127] Sherman, 2022, Genome-wide mapping of somatic mutation rates uncovers drivers of cancer, Nat Biotechnol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMultiple groups have reported using LLMs to extract structured data from clinical notes and to match patients to clinical trials.
“multiple groups have now reported on the use of LLMs to effectively extract structured data from clinical notes (150) and to match patients to clinical trials (arXiv:2303.16756,arXiv:2306.02077,arXiv:2304.07396, and arXiv:2308.02180).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [150] Agrawal, Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractors source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites arXiv:2303.16756
Not checked in the free run.
- cites arXiv:2306.02077
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn cancer, individual sites are limited in patient numbers, patient diversity, and local clinical practices.
“This is particularly important in cancer, where each site is limited in patient size, patient diversity, and its own set of embedded clinical practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenInterpretation of germline and somatic mutations in cancer remains a challenge, and new AI tools are emerging to automatically annotate and interpret variants.
“The interpretation of germline and somatic mutations observed in cancer continues to be a challenge, and new AI tools are also emerging to automatically annotate and interpret variants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT's first-line treatment recommendations for advanced solid tumors were generally promising, but in some cases it gave outdated information such as investigational drug names.
“Performance was generally promising, though there were cases in which the model arguably provided outdated information, such as investigational drug names (152).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] Schulte, 2023, Capacity of ChatGPT to identify guideline-based treatments for advanced solid tumors, Cureus
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationClinician burnout risks driving providers away from clinical practice and impairing access to care.
“that risks driving providers away from clinical practice and impairing access to care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe clinical trial system has inefficiencies, with 20% of trials prematurely terminated, many due to insufficient accrual.
“The clinical trial system also suffers from overall inefficiencies, where 20% of trials are prematurely terminated, many due to insufficient accrual of patients (147).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [147] Stensland, 2014, Adult cancer clinical trials that fail to complete: an epidemic?, J Natl Cancer Inst source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMD Anderson Cancer Center is creating a comprehensive AI-based Radiation Planning Assistant for autocontouring and radiotherapy planning, primarily targeting low- and middle-income countries.
“MD Anderson Cancer Center is also creating a comprehensive AI-based Radiation Planning Assistant for autocontouring and radiotherapy planning, and will primarily target low-and middleincome countries, where AI can provide scalable assistance (118).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118] MD Anderson Cancer Center: Radiation Planning Assistant
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenomics-based targeted NGS algorithms for cell-of-origin prediction have been rigorously evaluated and are being deployed and assessed for clinical utility.
“This includes genomics-based algorithms, where targeted NGS algorithms have been rigorously evaluated and are currently being deployed and assessed for clinical utility (134, 135).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [134] Penson, 2020, Development of genome-derived tumor type prediction to inform clinical cancer care, JAMA Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [135] Moon, 2023, Machine learning for genetics-based classification and treatment response prediction in cancer of unknown primary, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI models must be tested across multiple independent sites and evaluated for overall accuracy and potential bias.
“Beyond training, AI models must also be tested across multiple independent sites and evaluated for overall accuracy and potential bias (162).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [162] Karargyris, 2023, Federated benchmarking of medical artificial intelligence with MedPerf, Nat Mach Intell source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenRich molecular data are increasingly critical for personalized cancer treatment across cancer types.
“Rich molecular data are increasingly critical for personalized cancer treatment across cancer types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCell-of-origin prediction is a long-standing diagnostic challenge, particularly for cancers of unknown primary where accurate origin information could significantly affect treatment strategy.
“An additional long-standing diagnostic challenge is cell-oforigin prediction, which is particularly relevant for cancers of unknown primary where accurate origin information could significantly affect treatment strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningProperly deployed, AI could increase efficiencies and patient diversity within the clinical trial system and assist physicians in matching patients to trials.
“Properly deployed, AI could increase efficiencies and patient diversity within the clinical trial system and assist physicians in matching patients to clinical trials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFederated learning keeps data private at each institution while jointly updating and sharing machine learning models in a distributed manner.
“The third option is federated learning (FL), where data remain private at each institution, but machine learning models are jointly updated and shared in a distributed fashion (166, 167).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferent data modalities likely contain distinct and complementary information, making multimodal AI an active area of oncology research.
“These different data modalities are likely to contain distinct and complementary information; thus, multimodal AI is an active area of research in oncology (168, 169).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningBecause of this classification, randomized controlled clinical trials are not typically required by the FDA, though this can depend on intended use.
“Importantly, given this classification, randomized controlled clinical trials are not typically required by the FDA, though this can depend on the device's intended use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenNeither the United States nor the EU currently has AI-specific regulatory approval pathways for AI-based medical tools.
“Neither the United States nor the EU currently has AI-specific regulatory approval pathways for AI-based medical tools.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataClinical trials in AI oncology remain rare, but there is now an uptick in such trials.
“Although clinical trials in AI oncology remain rare, we are now starting to see an uptick in such trials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRegulation of large language models is evolving and debated, including which contexts and intended uses qualify them as medical devices.
“A particularly evolving and debated topic is the regulation of LLMs, and in which contexts and intended uses do they qualify as medical devices (191,192).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [191] Meskó, 2023, The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare, NPJ Digit Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [192] Gilbert, 2023, Large language model AI chatbots require approval as medical devices, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe same dataset and even model architecture can be used to support multiple clinical tasks, emphasizing the need for robust datasets.
“These efforts further emphasize the need for robust data sets, as the same data set and even model architecture can be used to support multiple clinical tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBoth the US and EU regulate AI healthcare applications as medical devices and categorize them by risk to individual patients.
“Rather, both regulate AI healthcare applications as medical devices and categorize such devices based on the level of risk posed to individual patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn oncology, potential sources of bias span the full patient care and AI life-cycle continuums.
“Both of these considerations certainly apply in oncology, where potential sources of bias span the full patient care and AI life-cycle continuums.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn clinical practice, there are known disparities in access to newer imaging technologies and in patient outcomes for underserved populations, such as Black women.
“In clinical practice, there are known disparities in access to newer imaging technologies and patient outcomes for underserved populations, such as Black women (176-178).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [176] Christensen, 2023, Relationship between race and access to newer mammographic technology in women with medicare insurance, Radiology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [177] Rauscher, 2012, Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance, J Womens Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [178] Martini, 2022, Breast cancer disparities in outcomes; unmasking biological determinants associated with racial and genetic diversity, Clin Exp Metastasis source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenClinical trials remain the gold standard for assessing new clinical interventions.
“An aspect that is closely tied to regulation is the evaluation of devices to ensure safe and effective performance, where clinical trials remain the gold standard in assessing new clinical interventions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe same study found breast cancer was the most commonly cited cancer type (31%), most commonly associated with radiology, providing evidence of advancing maturity of AI in mammography.
“The same study also found that breast cancer was the most commonly cited cancer type (31%), most commonly associated with radiology, providing further evidence of the advancing maturity of AI in mammography.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [194] Luchini, 2022, Artificial intelligence in oncology: current applications and future perspectives, Br J Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationEnsuring transparency and reproducibility is critical for independent research groups to review and build on prior scientific progress.
“A critical component of AI evaluation and development more generally is ensuring transparency and reproducibility, allowing independent research groups to review and build on prior scientific progress (196).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [196] Haibe-Kains, 2020, Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFDA clearance requirements depend largely on device class and intended use, with classes ranging from I (lowest risk) to III (highest risk).
“The requirements for FDA clearance depend largely on the class and intended use of the device, with device classes ranging from I (lowest risk) to III (highest risk).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenetic ancestry may be causally related to some genetic traits and diseases, unlike the social construct of race.
“Fairness and diversity have especially important considerations in such applications given that genetic ancestry may be causally related to some genetic traits and diseases (178, 183-186), as opposed to the social construct of race (173).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [178] Martini, 2022, Breast cancer disparities in outcomes; unmasking biological determinants associated with racial and genetic diversity, Clin Exp Metastasis source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [183] Zhang, 2019, Characterization of frequently mutated cancer genes in Chinese breast tumors: a comparison of Chinese and TCGA cohorts, Ann Transl Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [184] Mahal, 2020, Racial differences in genomic profiling of prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [185] Gusev, 2016, Atlas of prostate cancer heritability in European and African-American men pinpoints tissue-specific regulation, Nat Commun source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [186] Nassar, 2022, Ancestry-driven recalibration of tumor mutational burden and disparate clinical outcomes in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, Cancer Cell source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [173] Chen, 2023, Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare, Nat Biomed Eng source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationProgress has narrowed the performance gap between federated learning and centralized learning, and federated learning has been successfully applied to multiple cancer applications.
“Although FL introduces a number of logistical and algorithmic complexities, progress has been made in narrowing the gap in model performance between FL and centralized learning (160), where FL has now been successfully applied to multiple cancer applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160] Sheller, 2020, Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data, Sci Rep source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost AI devices, including oncology devices, are Class II, for which the FDA 510(k) pathway applies and requires substantial equivalence to already-cleared tools.
“The vast majority of AI devices thus far, including those in oncology, fall under Class II, for which the FDA 510(k) pathway applies and requires the device to be”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [187] Harvey, 2020, How the FDA regulates AI, Acad Radiol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThese algorithms are largely designed to assist clinicians in making diagnoses and/or quantify image-based properties, but the clinician makes the final call.
“These algorithms are largely designed to assist clinicians in making diagnoses and/or quantify image-based properties (e.g., lesion size), but the clinician makes the final call.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAwareness of AI algorithm fairness is growing, including guidance from regulatory bodies, but much room remains to reduce bias in AI and healthcare.
“Altogether, there is growing awareness of the fairness of AI algorithms, including guidance from regulatory bodies, but there remains much room for improvement in reducing bias in AI and healthcare more broadly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeidentification and public release of data, often through consortium models, is an option for data sharing; CAMELYON and BraTS challenges have made large-scale deidentified datasets available, and the Nightingale Open Science Initiative aims to release more.
“The second option is deidentification and public release of data, usually via a consortium model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [45] Ehteshami Bejnordi, 2017, Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [165] Mullainathan, 2022, Solving medicine's data bottleneck: Nightingale Open Science, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLuchini and colleagues summarized 71 FDA-cleared devices in oncology up to 2021 and found radiology accounted for 54.9% and pathology 19.7%.
“For example, Luchini and colleagues (194) summarized 71 FDA-cleared devices in oncology (up to 2021) and found that radiology accounted for the majority of approved devices (54.9%), followed by pathology (19.7%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [194] Luchini, 2022, Artificial intelligence in oncology: current applications and future perspectives, Br J Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenTCGA has become a critical multimodal dataset for advancing AI efforts.
“This work leverages the TCGA database, which has become a critical multimodal data set to advance AI efforts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisecitationFoundation models trained on vast quantities of data have shown promise in facilitating downstream tasks with less labeled data, a common situation in oncology.
“Such”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites arXiv:2108.07258
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn the EU, no single central agency performs device assessments; accredited organizations issue CE marks.
“Within the EU, there is no one central agency that performs device assessments; rather, assessments are handled by accredited organizations, which are empowered to issue CE marks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere are efforts to generate more diverse public datasets, such as EMBED, and instances where AI performance has generalized well across different patient populations.
“Conversely, there are efforts to generate more diverse public data sets, such as EMBED (180), and instances where AI performance has generalized well across different patient populations (9,10,12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [180] Jeong, 2023, The EMory BrEast imaging Dataset (EMBED): a racially diverse, granular dataset of 3.4 million screening and diagnostic mammographic images, Radiol Artif Intell source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] McKinney, 2020, International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Lotter, 2021, Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMost described AI applications fall under regulatory agencies, depending on regional regulations and intended use.
“Most of the described AI applications fall under the purview of regulatory agencies, depending on regional regulations and the intended use of the device.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe precise form of AI results requires careful consideration of the clinical end goal and intended use of the device.
“The precise form of the AI results requires careful consideration of the clinical end goal and the intended use of the device.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningTransparency and reproducibility are especially important for assessing potential biases in datasets and generalizability across clinical settings.
“This is especially important for assessing potential biases in data sets and generalizability across different clinical settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough AI will ideally improve healthcare outcomes, its biggest impact may ultimately be in improving resource allocation and access to quality care.
“Critically, although AI will ideally improve healthcare outcomes, its biggest impact may ultimately be in improving resource allocation and access to quality care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe healthcare value of AI deployment needs rigorous assessment and aligned payment structures.
“Second, the healthcare value of AI deployment needs to be rigorously assessed and combined with aligned payment structures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIntegration into clinical systems can be especially challenging for proprietary systems with limited customization.
“Such workflows require integration into clinical systems, which can be especially challenging for proprietary systems with limited customization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThis assessment will require greater investment in real-world studies and ideally randomized clinical trials, with emphasis on evaluating AI generalizability across patient populations and clinical sites.
“This will require a greater investment in real-world studies and ideally randomized clinical trials, with an emphasis on critically evaluating AI generalizability across patient populations and clinical sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenThe future of AI oncology will not be driven by technology innovation alone.
“Nonetheless, the future of AI oncology will not be driven by technology innovation alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningSeveral fundamental requirements will drive the future of AI in oncology, including objective assessment of impact on patient outcomes, rigorous assessment of healthcare value, standardized clinical integration, and continuous monitoring of impact and safety.
“Rather, we see several fundamental requirements that will drive the future of AI in oncology (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThere is a strong need for objective assessment of AI's impact on patient outcomes using cancer-specific, clinically meaningful metrics.
“First, there is a strong need for an objective assessment of AI's impact on patient outcomes, defined in cancer-specific, clinically meaningful metrics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningStakeholders must adopt objective processes for continuously monitoring AI impact and measuring patient safety.
“Finally, stakeholders must adopt objective processes for continuously monitoring AI impact and measuring patient safety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningRealizing these benefits may require structural changes and new clinical workflows.
“Realizing these benefits may require structural changes and new clinical workflows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe greatest strength of data-driven deep learning approaches is their ability to continually improve over time.
“Arguably, the greatest strength of data-driven, deep learning approaches is the ability to continually improve over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHealthcare value is defined as the health outcome achieved per dollar spent and is a critical metric for informed healthcare investments.
“Healthcare value is defined as the health outcome achieved per dollar spent (214) and is a critical metric for making informed healthcare investments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [214] Porter, 2010, What is value in health care?, N Engl J Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningRealizing the benefits of continual improvement requires well-defined regulatory processes and joint efforts to continuously monitor AI devices over the long term.
“However, realizing these benefits requires well-defined regulatory processes and joint efforts to continuously monitor AI devices over the long-term.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningData pipelines must be developed to route data to AI systems and make AI results available to clinicians.
“Beyond initial hardware considerations, data pipelines must also be developed to efficiently route data to AI systems and subsequently make the AI results available to clinicians.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCommon XAI approaches use post hoc explanations, such as saliency maps that highlight input aspects contributing most to a model's prediction.
“Common approaches to XAI involve post hoc explanations, such as generating saliency maps that highlight aspects of the input that most contribute to the model's prediction (204).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [204] van der Velden, 2022, Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis, Med Image Anal source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe field of AI in oncology is developing at a rapid pace.
“The field of AI in oncology is developing at a rapid pace.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMonetization and liability questions can hinder widespread adoption of AI, and the vast majority of commercially available AI devices are not currently reimbursed.
“Even with effective infrastructure and AI outputs, monetization and liability questions can hinder widespread adoption, where the vast majority of commercially available AI devices are not currently reimbursed (210).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [210] Parikh, 2022, Paying for artificial intelligence in medicine, NPJ Digit Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSPIRIT-AI provides 15 extended items for AI-focused protocol documents, and CONSORT-AI provides 14 extended items for reporting AI-focused clinical trials.
“Additional guidelines include SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence), which provides an extended set of 15 items for AI-focused protocol documents (199), and CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials-Artificial Intelligence), which provides an extended set of 14 items for reporting on AI-focused clinical trials (200).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [199] Rivera, 2020, Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension, Lancet Digit Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [200] Liu, 2020, Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension, Nat Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMINIMAR defines a minimal set of reporting elements covering study population and setting, patient demographics, model architecture, and model evaluation.
“This includes MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting), which defines a minimal set of reporting elements covering study population and setting, patient demographics, model architecture, and model evaluation (198)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [198] Hernandez-Boussard, 2020, MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care, J Am Med Inform Assoc source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationESMO-GROW provides publication guidelines for using real-world data in oncology, including AI-focused reporting guidelines.
“Finally, there is an increasing use of AI in analyzing real-world data (RWD), and the European Society for Medical Oncology Guidance for Reporting Oncology Real-World Evidence (ESMO-GROW) now provides publication guidelines regarding the use of RWD in oncology, along with specific AIfocused reporting guidelines (201).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [201] Castelo-Branco, 2023, ESMO guidance for reporting oncology real-world evidence (GROW), Ann Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningContinuous monitoring applies even to frozen AI devices that may experience data or population shifts over time.
“This necessity applies even to”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationRealizing AI's potential in oncology requires effective integration into clinical workflows, which presents logistical and scientific challenges.
“Realizing the potential of AI in oncology requires effective integration into clinical workflows, which presents both logistical and scientific challenges (202).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [202] Chua, 2021, Artificial intelligence in oncology: path to implementation, Cancer Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningExplainable AI is an active research area focused on conveying how an AI model arrived at its prediction.
“As such, explainable AI (XAI) is a highly active area of research focused on conveying how an AI model arrived at its prediction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAI applications require significant computational infrastructure and highly skilled engineers, likely extending already stretched healthcare IT budgets.
“AI applications require significant computational infrastructure (either on-premise or cloud-based) and highly skilled engineers-both of which are likely to extend already stretched healthcare information technology (IT) budgets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
AI applications are accelerating from development to clinical use.
“This focus is motivated by the accelerated advancement of AI applications from development to clinical use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinical trials are the primary mechanism for evaluating and advancing new cancer therapeutics.
“Clinical trials are the primary mechanism for evaluating and advancing new cancer therapeutics.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modern clinical oncology faces data complexity that exceeds human analytical capacity.
“Modern clinical oncology faces an unprecedented data complexity that exceeds human analytical capacity”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
As of 2024, the FDA had cleared or approved approximately 700 AI/ML-enabled medical devices, 76% of which are related to radiology.
“As of 2024, the FDA had cleared or approved approximately 700 AI/ML-enabled medical devices, 76% of which are related to radiology.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
(1996) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(96)90463-0 · Cited by 14,759 · see citing works
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102873 · Cited by 11,064 · see citing works
Rudin, C. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x · Cited by 10,561 · see citing works
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning
Cohen, W. W., McCallum, A., & Roweis, S. T. (2008) · Cited by 5,691 · see citing works
Porter, M. E. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1011024 · Cited by 5,084 · see citing works
Large language models encode clinical knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 · Cited by 4,083 · see citing works
Ehteshami Bejnordi, B., Veta, M., Johannes van Diest, P., van Ginneken, B., Karssemeijer, N., Litjens, G., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., and the CAMELYON16 Consortium, Hermsen, M., Manson, Q. F., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.14585 · Cited by 3,293 · see citing works
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
McKinney, S. M., Sieniek, M., Godbole, V., Godwin, J., Antropova, N., Ashrafian, H., Back, T., Chesus, M., Corrado, G. S., Darzi, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 · Cited by 3,287 · see citing works
The future of digital health with federated learning
Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1 · Cited by 3,119 · see citing works
Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes
The ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium, Aaltonen, L. A., Abascal, F., Abeshouse, A., Aburatani, H., Adams, D. J., Agrawal, N., Ahn, K. S., Ahn, S.-M., Aikata, H., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6 · Cited by 3,064 · see citing works
Self-citationCoudray, N., Ocampo, P. S., Sakellaropoulos, T., Narula, N., Snuderl, M., Fenyö, D., Moreira, A. L., Razavian, N., & Tsirigos, A. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0177-5 · Cited by 2,930 · see citing works
OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base
Chakravarty, D., Gao, J., Phillips, S. M., Kundra, R., Zhang, H., Wang, J., Rudolph, J. E., Yaeger, R. D., Soumerai, T. E., Nissan, M. H., et al. (2017) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.17.00011 · Cited by 2,732 · see citing works
Self-citationTurkbey, B., Rosenkrantz, A. B., Haider, M. A., Padhani, A. R., Villeirs, G., Macura, K. J., Tempany, C. M., Choyke, P. L., Cornud, F., Margolis, D. J., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033 · Cited by 2,544 · see citing works
Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images
Lu, M. Y., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., Chen, R. J., Barbieri, M., & Mahmood, F. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-020-00682-w · Cited by 2,282 · see citing works
Ardila, D., Kiraly, A. P., Bharadwaj, S., Choi, B., Reicher, J. J., Peng, L., Tse, D., Etemadi, M., Ye, W., Corrado, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x · Cited by 2,167 · see citing works
Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense
Cheng, J., Novati, G., Pan, J., Bycroft, C., Žemgulytė, A., Applebaum, T., Pritzel, A., Wong, L. H., Zielinski, M., Sargeant, T., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7492 · Cited by 2,163 · see citing works
Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Race-, Sex-, and Age-Based Disparities
Murthy, V. H., Krumholz, H. M., & Gross, C. P. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.22.2720 · Cited by 2,078 · see citing works
Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence
Moor, M., Banerjee, O., Abad, Z. S. H., Krumholz, H. M., Leskovec, J., Topol, E. J., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4 · Cited by 2,028 · see citing works
AACR Project GENIE: Powering Precision Medicine through an International Consortium
The AACR Project GENIE Consortium, The AACR Project GENIE Consortium, André, F., Arnedos, M., Baras, A. S., Baselga, J., Bedard, P. L., Berger, M. F., Bierkens, M., Calvo, F., et al. (2017) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0151 · Cited by 1,964 · see citing works
Self-citationScreening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
US Preventive Services Task Force, Krist, A. H., Davidson, K. W., Mangione, C. M., Barry, M. J., Cabana, M., Caughey, A. B., Davis, E. M., Donahue, K. E., Doubeni, C. A., et al. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.1117 · Cited by 1,816 · see citing works
Sheller, M. J., Edwards, B., Reina, G. A., Martin, J., Pati, S., Kotrotsou, A., Milchenko, M., Xu, W., Marcus, D., Colen, R. R., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1 · Cited by 1,646 · see citing works
Jurtz, V. I., Paul, S., Andreatta, M., Marcatili, P., Peters, B., & Nielsen, M. (2017) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1700893 · Cited by 1,476 · see citing works
Kather, J. N., Pearson, A. T., Halama, N., Jäger, D., Krause, J., Loosen, S. H., Marx, A., Boor, P., Tacke, F., Neumann, U. P., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0462-y · Cited by 1,458 · see citing works
Liu, X., Cruz Rivera, S., Moher, D., Calvert, M. J., Denniston, A. K., The SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group, SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Steering Group, Chan, A.-W., Darzi, A., Holmes, C., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x · Cited by 1,421 · see citing works
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis
van der Velden, B. H. M., Kuijf, H. J., Gilhuijs, K. G. A., & Viergever, M. A. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102470 · Cited by 1,328 · see citing works
Digital pathology and artificial intelligence
Niazi, M. K. K., Parwani, A. V., & Gurcan, M. N. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30154-8 · Cited by 1,232 · see citing works
Patients’ expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer
Weeks, J. C., Catalano, P. J., Cronin, A., Finkelman, M. D., Mack, J. W., Keating, N. L., & Schrag, D. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1204410 · Cited by 1,149 · see citing works
Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks
Mobadersany, P., Yousefi, S., Amgad, M., Gutman, D. A., Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., Velázquez Vega, J. E., Brat, D. J., & Cooper, L. A. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1717139115 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Kather, J. N., Krisam, J., Charoentong, P., Luedde, T., Herpel, E., Weis, C.-A., Gaiser, T., Marx, A., Valous, N. A., Ferber, D., et al. (2019) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002730 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare
Meskó, B., & Topol, E. J. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00873-0 · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
Saltz, J., Gupta, R., Hou, L., Kurc, T., Singh, P., Nguyen, V., Samaras, D., Shroyer, K. R., Zhao, T., Batiste, R., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.086 · Cited by 1,027 · see citing works
Self-citationYu, K.-H., Zhang, C., Berry, G. J., Altman, R. B., Ré, C., Rubin, D. L., & Snyder, M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12474 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Arndt, B. G., Beasley, J. W., Watkinson, M. D., Temte, J. L., Tuan, W.-J., Sinsky, C. A., & Gilchrist, V. J. (2017) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2121 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Hollon, T. C., Pandian, B., Adapa, A. R., Urias, E., Save, A. V., Khalsa, S. S. S., Eichberg, D. G., D’Amico, R. S., Farooq, Z. U., Lewis, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0715-9 · Cited by 790 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research and Precision Medicine
Bhinder, B., Gilvary, C., Madhukar, N. S., & Elemento, O. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0090 · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence for multimodal data integration in oncology
Lipkova, J., Chen, R. J., Chen, B., Lu, M. Y., Barbieri, M., Shao, D., Vaidya, A. J., Chen, C., Zhuang, L., Williamson, D. F. K., et al. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.09.012 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare
Chen, R. J., Wang, J. J., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., Lipkova, J., Lu, M. Y., Sahai, S., & Mahmood, F. (2023) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01056-8 · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Bulten, W., Pinckaers, H., van Boven, H., Vink, R., de Bel, T., van Ginneken, B., van der Laak, J., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, C., & Litjens, G. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30739-9 · Cited by 705 · see citing works
A visual–language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter
Huang, Z., Bianchi, F., Yuksekgonul, M., Montine, T. J., & Zou, J. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02504-3 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer
Giuliano, A. E., Edge, S. B., & Hortobagyi, G. N. (2018) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6486-6 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Muehlematter, U. J., Daniore, P., & Vokinger, K. N. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30292-2 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Harnessing multimodal data integration to advance precision oncology
Boehm, K. M., Khosravi, P., Vanguri, R., Gao, J., & Shah, S. P. (2022) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00408-3 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Pan-cancer integrative histology-genomic analysis via multimodal deep learning
Chen, R. J., Lu, M. Y., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., Lipkova, J., Noor, Z., Shaban, M., Shady, M., Williams, M., Joo, B., et al. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.07.004 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Pan-cancer image-based detection of clinically actionable genetic alterations
Kather, J. N., Heij, L. R., Grabsch, H. I., Loeffler, C. M. L., Echle, A., Muti, H. S., Krause, J., Niehues, J., Sommer, K. A. J., Bankhead, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0087-6 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial
Repici, A., Badalamenti, M., Maselli, R., Correale, L., Radaelli, F., Rondonotti, E., Ferrara, E., Spadaccini, M., Alkandari, A., Fugazza, A., et al. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer
Bychkov, D., Linder, N., Turkki, R., Nordling, S., Kovanen, P. E., Verrill, C., Walliander, M., Lundin, M., Haglund, C., & Lundin, J. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21758-3 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Pan-cancer computational histopathology reveals mutations, tumor composition and prognosis
Fu, Y., Jung, A. W., Viñas, R., González, S., Vöhringer, H. S., Shmatko, A., Yates, L. R., Jimenez‐Liñan, M., Moore, L., & Gerstung, M. (2020) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0085-8 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
AI-based pathology predicts origins for cancers of unknown primary
Lu, M. Y., Chen, T. Y., Williamson, D. F. K., Zhao, M., Shady, M., Lipkova, J., & Mahmood, F. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03512-4 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Griffith, M., Spies, N. C., Krysiak, K., McMichael, J. F., Coffman, A. C., Danos, A. M., Ainscough, B. J., Ramirez, C. A., Rieke, D. T., Kujan, L., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3774 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study
Skrede, O.-J., De Raedt, S., Kleppe, A., Hveem, T. S., Liestøl, K., Maddison, J., Askautrud, H. A., Pradhan, M., Nesheim, J. A., Albregtsen, F., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32998-8 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Ström, P., Kartasalo, K., Olsson, H., Solorzano, L., Delahunt, B., Berney, D. M., Bostwick, D. G., Evans, A. J., Grignon, D. J., Humphrey, P. A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30738-7 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Lång, K., Josefsson, V., Larsson, A.-M., Larsson, S., Högberg, C., Sartor, H., Hofvind, S., Andersson, I., & Rosso, A. (2023) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00298-x · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Simera, I., Moher, D., Hirst, A., Hoey, J., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-24 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence
Haibe-Kains, B., Adam, G. A., Hosny, A., Khodakarami, F., Massive Analysis Quality Control (MAQC) Society Board of Directors, Shraddha, T., Kusko, R., Sansone, S.-A., Tong, W., Wolfinger, R. D., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2766-y · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Microsatellite instability: a review of what the oncologist should know
Li, K., Luo, H., Huang, L., Luo, H., & Zhu, X. (2020) · Cancer Cell International · doi:10.1186/s12935-019-1091-8 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Sarkizova, S., Klaeger, S., Le, P. M., Li, L. W., Oliveira, G., Keshishian, H., Hartigan, C. R., Zhang, W., Braun, D. A., Ligon, K. L., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0322-9 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Nagpal, K., Foote, D., Liu, Y., Chen, P.-H. C., Wulczyn, E., Tan, F., Olson, N., Smith, J. L., Mohtashamian, A., Wren, J. H., et al. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0112-2 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Steiner, D. F., MacDonald, R., Liu, Y., Truszkowski, P., Hipp, J. D., Gammage, C., Thng, F., Peng, L., & Stumpe, M. C. (2018) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000001151 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Cruz Rivera, S., Liu, X., Chan, A.-W., Denniston, A. K., Calvert, M. J., Ashrafian, H., Beam, A. L., Collins, G. S., Darzi, A., Deeks, J. J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30219-3 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Biologically informed deep neural network for prostate cancer discovery
Elmarakeby, H. A., Hwang, J., Arafeh, R., Crowdis, J., Gang, S., Liu, D., AlDubayan, S. H., Salari, K., Kregel, S., Richter, C., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03922-4 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology
Huynh, E., Hosny, A., Guthier, C. V., Bitterman, D. S., Petit, S., Haas-Kogan, D. A., Kann, B. H., Aerts, H. J. W. L., & Mak, R. H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0417-8 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Lotter, W., Diab, A. R., Haslam, B., Kim, J. G., Grisot, G., Wu, E., Wu, K., Onieva, J. O., Boyer, Y., Boxerman, J. L., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01174-9 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Wang, P., Liu, X., Berzin, T. M., Glissen Brown, J. R., Liu, P., Zhou, C., Lei, L., Li, L., Guo, Z., Lei, S., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30411-x · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Hernandez-Boussard, T., Bozkurt, S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Shah, N. H. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa088 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Schaffter, T., Buist, D. S. M., Lee, C. I., Nikulin, Y., Ribli, D., Guan, Y., Lotter, W., Jie, Z., Du, H., Wang, S., et al. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0265 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Self-citationPrecision oncology: an overview
Garraway, L. A., Verweij, J., & Ballman, K. V. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.49.4799 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Multimodal Co-Attention Transformer for Survival Prediction in Gigapixel Whole Slide Images
Chen, R. J., Lu, M. Y., Weng, W.-H., Chen, T. Y., Williamson, D. F., Manz, T., Shady, M., & Mahmood, F. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00398 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Vanguri, R. S., Luo, J., Aukerman, A. T., Egger, J. V., Fong, C. J., Horvat, N., Pagano, A., Araujo-Filho, J. D. A. B., Geneslaw, L., Rizvi, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00416-8 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection
Pati, S., Baid, U., Edwards, B., Sheller, M., Wang, S.-H., Reina, G. A., Foley, P., Gruzdev, A., Karkada, D., Davatzikos, C., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33407-5 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Clinical-Grade Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Tumors by Deep Learning
Echle, A., Grabsch, H. I., Quirke, P., van den Brandt, P. A., West, N. P., Hutchins, G. G. A., Heij, L. R., Tan, X., Richman, S. D., Krause, J., et al. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.021 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Racial/ethnic disparities in genomic sequencing
Spratt, D. E., Chan, T., Waldron, L., Speers, C., Feng, F. Y., Ogunwobi, O. O., & Osborne, J. R. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1854 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Gerke, S., Babic, B., Evgeniou, T., & Cohen, I. G. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0262-2 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractors
Agrawal, M., Hegselmann, S., Lang, H., Kim, Y., & Sontag, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.130 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Boehm, K. M., Aherne, E. A., Ellenson, L., Nikolovski, I., Alghamdi, M., Vázquez-García, I., Zamarin, D., Long Roche, K., Liu, Y., Patel, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00388-9 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Deep learning for classification of colorectal polyps on whole-slide images
Korbar, B., Olofson, A. M., Miraflor, A. P., Nicka, C. M., Suriawinata, M. A., Torresani, L., Suriawinata, A. A., & Hassanpour, S. (2017) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_34_17 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Koh, P. W., Nguyen, T., Tang, Y. S., Mussmann, S., Pierson, E., Kim, B., & Liang, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04612 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Couture, H. D., Williams, L. A., Geradts, J., Nyante, S. J., Butler, E. N., Marron, J. S., Perou, C. M., Troester, M. A., & Niethammer, M. (2018) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-018-0079-1 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Leveraging large language models for decision support in personalized oncology
Benary, M., Wang, X. D., Schmidt, M., Soll, D., Hilfenhaus, G., Nassir, M., Sigler, C., Knödler, M., Keller, U., Beule, D., et al. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43689 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Deep learning-based prediction of the T cell receptor–antigen binding specificity
Lu, T., Zhang, Z., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., Jiang, P., Xiao, X., Bernatchez, C., Heymach, J. V., Gibbons, D. L., Wang, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00383-2 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Johnson, S. B., King, A. J., Warner, E. L., Aneja, S., Kann, B. H., & Bylund, C. L. (2023) · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkad015 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Mikhael, P. G., Wohlwend, J., Yala, A., Karstens, L., Xiang, J., Takigami, A. K., Bourgouin, P. P., Chan, P., Mrah, S., Amayri, W., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.01345 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
DeepTCR is a deep learning framework for revealing sequence concepts within T-cell repertoires
Sidhom, J.-W., Larman, H. B., Pardoll, D. M., & Baras, A. S. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21879-w · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in oncology: current applications and future perspectives
Luchini, C., Pea, A., & Scarpa, A. (2022) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-021-01633-1 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Park, S., Ock, C.-Y., Kim, H., Pereira, S., Park, S., Ma, M., Choi, S., Kim, S., Shin, S., Aum, B. J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.02010 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
AI-based pathology predicts origins for cancers of unknown primary
Lu, M. Y., Chen, T., Williamson, D. F. K., Zhao, M. M., Shady, M., Lipková, J., & Mahmood, F. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Multistain deep learning for prediction of prognosis and therapy response in colorectal cancer
Foersch, S., Glasner, C., Woerl, A.-C., Eckstein, M., Wagner, D.-C., Schulz, S., Kellers, F., Fernandez, A., Tserea, K., Kloth, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02134-1 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
ESMO guidance for reporting oncology real-world evidence (GROW)
Castelo-Branco, L., Pellat, A., Martins-Branco, D., Valachis, A., Derksen, J. W. G., Suijkerbuijk, K. P. M., Dafni, U., Dellaporta, T., Vogel, A., Prelaj, A., et al. (2023) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.001 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials, a decade later: have we improved?
Kwiatkowski, K., Coe, K., Bailar, J. C., & Swanson, G. M. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28168 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Treating health disparities with artificial intelligence
Chen, I. Y., Joshi, S., & Ghassemi, M. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0649-2 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Interpretable survival prediction for colorectal cancer using deep learning
Wulczyn, E., Steiner, D. F., Moran, M., Plass, M., Reihs, R., Tan, F., Flament-Auvigne, I., Brown, T., Regitnig, P., Chen, P.-H. C., et al. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00427-2 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Field, J. K., Vulkan, D., Davies, M. P. A., Baldwin, D. R., Brain, K. E., Devaraj, A., Eisen, T., Gosney, J., Green, B. A., Holemans, J. A., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100179 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Computer vision in surgery: from potential to clinical value
Mascagni, P., Alapatt, D., Sestini, L., Altieri, M. S., Madani, A., Watanabe, Y., Alseidi, A., Redan, J. A., Alfieri, S., Costamagna, G., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00707-5 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Swarm learning for decentralized artificial intelligence in cancer histopathology
Saldanha, O. L., Quirke, P., West, N. P., James, J. A., Loughrey, M. B., Grabsch, H. I., Salto-Tellez, M., Alwers, E., Cifci, D., Ghaffari Laleh, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01768-5 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Esteva, A., Feng, J., van der Wal, D., Huang, S.-C., Simko, J. P., DeVries, S., Chen, E., Schaeffer, E. M., Morgan, T. M., Sun, Y., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00613-w · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Ogier du Terrail, J., Leopold, A., Joly, C., Béguier, C., Andreux, M., Maussion, C., Schmauch, B., Tramel, E. W., Bendjebbar, E., Zaslavskiy, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02155-w · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Improved breast cancer histological grading using deep learning
Wang, Y., Acs, B., Robertson, S., Liu, B., Solorzano, L., Wählby, C., Hartman, J., & Rantalainen, M. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.007 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Xu, H., Tang, R. S. Y., Lam, T. Y. T., Zhao, G., Lau, J. Y. W., Liu, Y., Wu, Q., Rong, L., Xu, W., Li, X., et al. (2023) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Large language model AI chatbots require approval as medical devices
Gilbert, S., Harvey, H., Melvin, T., Vollebregt, E., & Wicks, P. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02412-6 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Multi-institutional validation of a mammography-based breast cancer risk model
Yala, A., Mikhael, P. G., Strand, F., Lin, G., Satuluru, S., Kim, T., Banerjee, I., Gichoya, J., Trivedi, H., Lehman, C. D., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01337 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Shamai, G., Livne, A., Polónia, A., Sabo, E., Cretu, A., Bar-Sela, G., & Kimmel, R. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34275-9 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Federated benchmarking of medical artificial intelligence with MedPerf
Karargyris, A., Umeton, R., Sheller, M. J., Aristizabal, A., George, J., Wuest, A., Pati, S., Kassem, H., Zenk, M., Baid, U., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00652-2 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Raciti, P., Sue, J., Ceballos, R., Godrich, R., Kunz, J. D., Kapur, S., Reuter, V., Grady, L., Kanan, C., Klimstra, D. S., et al. (2020) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/s41379-020-0551-y · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Context-aware convolutional neural network for grading of colorectal cancer histology images
Shaban, M., Awan, R., Fraz, M. M., Azam, A., Tsang, Y.-W., Snead, D., & Rajpoot, N. M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.2971006 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in oncology: path to implementation
Chua, I. S., Gaziel‐Yablowitz, M., Korach, Z. T., Kehl, K. L., Levitan, N. A., Arriaga, Y. E., Jackson, G. P., Bates, D. W., & Hassett, M. (2021) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.3935 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citationIndependent real‐world application of a clinical‐grade automated prostate cancer detection system
da Silva, L. M., Pereira, E. M., Salles, P. G., Godrich, R., Ceballos, R., Kunz, J. D., Casson, A., Viret, J., Chandarlapaty, S., Ferreira, C. G., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.5662 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Robertson, S. L., Robinson, M. D., & Reid, A. (2017) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-16-00123.1 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Adult cancer clinical trials that fail to complete: an epidemic?
Stensland, K. D., McBride, R. B., Latif, A., Wisnivesky, J., Hendricks, R., Roper, N., Boffetta, P., Hall, S. J., Oh, W. K., & Galsky, M. D. (2014) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dju229 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Morphological and molecular breast cancer profiling through explainable machine learning
Binder, A., Bockmayr, M., Hägele, M., Wienert, S., Heim, D., Hellweg, K., Ishii, M., Stenzinger, A., Hocke, A., Denkert, C., et al. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00303-4 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Wu, Z., Trevino, A. E., Wu, E., Swanson, K., Kim, H. J., D’Angio, H. B., Preska, R., Charville, G. W., Dalerba, P. D., Egloff, A. M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00951-w · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence predictive model for hormone therapy use in prostate cancer
Spratt, D. E., Tang, S., Sun, Y., Huang, H.-C., Chen, E., Mohamad, O., Armstrong, A. J., Tward, J. D., Nguyen, P. L., Lang, J. M., et al. (2023) · NEJM Evidence · doi:10.1056/evidoa2300023 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Shaukat, A., Lichtenstein, D. R., Somers, S. C., Chung, D. C., Perdue, D. G., Gopal, M., Colucci, D. R., Phillips, S. A., Marka, N. A., Church, T. R., et al. (2022) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.028 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Visual Classification via Description from Large Language ModelsPreprint
Menon, S., & Vondrick, C. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.07183 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Accurate recognition of colorectal cancer with semi-supervised deep learning on pathological images
Yu, G., Sun, K., Xu, C., Shi, X.-H., Wu, C., Xie, T., Meng, R.-Q., Meng, X.-H., Wang, K.-S., Xiao, H.-M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26643-8 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Rakaee, M., Adib, E., Ricciuti, B., Sholl, L. M., Shi, W., Alessi, J. V., Cortellini, A., Fulgenzi, C. A. M., Viola, P., Pinato, D. J., et al. (2023) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4933 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Nam, J. G., Hwang, E. J., Kim, J., Park, N., Lee, E. H., Kim, H. J., Nam, M., Lee, J. H., Park, C. M., & Goo, J. M. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.221894 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
A population-level digital histologic biomarker for enhanced prognosis of invasive breast cancer
Amgad, M., Hodge, J. M., Elsebaie, M. A. T., Bodelon, C., Puvanesarajah, S., Gutman, D. A., Siziopikou, K. P., Goldstein, J. A., Gaudet, M. M., Teras, L. R., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02643-7 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Histopathology images predict multi-omics aberrations and prognoses in colorectal cancer patients
Tsai, P.-C., Lee, T.-H., Kuo, K.-C., Su, F.-Y., Lee, T.-L. M., Marostica, E., Ugai, T., Zhao, M., Lau, M. C., Väyrynen, J. P., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37179-4 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Interactive explainable deep learning model informs prostate cancer diagnosis at MRI
Hamm, C. A., Baumgärtner, G. L., Biessmann, F., Beetz, N. L., Hartenstein, A., Savic, L. J., Froböse, K., Dräger, F., Schallenberg, S., Rudolph, M., et al. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222276 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Paying for artificial intelligence in medicine
Parikh, R. B., & Helmchen, L. A. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00609-6 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Sha, L., Osinski, B. L., Ho, I. Y., Tan, T. L., Willis, C., Weiss, H., Beaubier, N., Mahon, B. M., Taxter, T. J., & Yip, S. S. F. (2019) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_24_19 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance
Rauscher, G. H., Allgood, K. L., Whitman, S., & Conant, E. (2012) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.2415 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Veta, M., van Diest, P. J., Jiwa, M., Al-Janabi, S., & Pluim, J. P. W. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161286 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
An MRI deep learning model predicts outcome in rectal cancer
Jiang, X., Zhao, H., Saldanha, O. L., Nebelung, S., Kuhl, C., Amygdalos, I., Lang, S. A., Wu, X., Meng, X., Truhn, D., et al. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222223 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Racial differences in genomic profiling of prostate cancer
Mahal, B. A., Alshalalfa, M., Kensler, K. H., Chowdhury-Paulino, I., Kantoff, P., Mucci, L. A., Schaeffer, E. M., Spratt, D., Yamoah, K., Nguyen, P. L., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2000069 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Diagnostic evaluation of a deep learning model for optical diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Zhou, D., Tian, F., Tian, X., Sun, L., Huang, X., Zhao, F., Zhou, N., Chen, Z., Zhang, Q., Yang, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16777-6 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Moon, I., LoPiccolo, J., Baca, S. C., Sholl, L. M., Kehl, K. L., Hassett, M. J., Liu, D., Schrag, D., & Gusev, A. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02482-6 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Nassar, A. H., Adib, E., Abou Alaiwi, S., El Zarif, T., Groha, S., Akl, E. W., Nuzzo, P. V., Mouhieddine, T. H., Perea-Chamblee, T., Taraszka, K., et al. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.08.022 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationSaad, M. B., Hong, L., Aminu, M., Vokes, N. I., Chen, P., Salehjahromi, M., Qin, K., Sujit, S. J., Lu, X., Young, E., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00082-1 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Deep learning assisted mitotic counting for breast cancer
Balkenhol, M. C. A., Tellez, D., Vreuls, W., Clahsen, P. C., Pinckaers, H., Ciompi, F., Bult, P., & van der Laak, J. A. W. M. (2019) · Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1038/s41374-019-0275-0 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Winkel, D. J., Tong, A., Lou, B., Kamen, A., Comaniciu, D., Disselhorst, J. A., Rodríguez-Ruiz, A., Huisman, H., Szolar, D., Shabunin, I., et al. (2021) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/rli.0000000000000780 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Development of genome-derived tumor type prediction to inform clinical cancer care
Penson, A., Camacho, N., Zheng, Y., Varghese, A. M., Al-Ahmadie, H., Razavi, P., Chandarlapaty, S., Vallejo, C. E., Vakiani, E., Gilewski, T., et al. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3985 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationHarvey, H. B., & Gowda, V. (2020) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.017 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Sandbank, J., Bataillon, G., Nudelman, A., Krasnitsky, I., Mikulinsky, R., Bien, L., Thibault, L., Albrecht Shach, A., Sebag, G., Clark, D. P., et al. (2022) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-022-00496-w · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Echle, A., Ghaffari Laleh, N., Quirke, P., Grabsch, H. I., Muti, H. S., Saldanha, O. L., Brockmoeller, S. F., van den Brandt, P. A., Hutchins, G. G. A., Richman, S. D., et al. (2022) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100400 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Luo, P., Ding, Y., Lei, X., & Wu, F.-X. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00013 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Predicting tumour mutational burden from histopathological images using multiscale deep learning
Jain, M. S., & Massoud, T. F. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0190-5 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Characterizing the clinical adoption of medical AI devices through U.S. insurance claims
Wu, K., Wu, E., Theodorou, B., Liang, W., Mack, C., Glass, L., Sun, J., & Zou, J. (2024) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aioa2300030 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Arasu, V. A., Habel, L. A., Achacoso, N. S., Buist, D. S. M., Cord, J. B., Esserman, L. J., Hylton, N. M., Glymour, M. M., Kornak, J., Kushi, L. H., et al. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222733 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Jeong, J. J., Vey, B. L., Bhimireddy, A., Kim, T., Santos, T., Correa, R., Dutt, R., Mosunjac, M., Oprea-Ilies, G., Smith, G., et al. (2023) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.220047 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Grewal, J. K., Tessier-Cloutier, B., Jones, M., Gakkhar, S., Ma, Y., Moore, R., Mungall, A. J., Zhao, Y., Taylor, M. D., Gelmon, K., et al. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2597 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy Detection of Advanced Neoplasias
Mangas‐Sanjuán, C., de–Castro, L., Cubiella, J., Díez‐Redondo, P., Suárez, A., Pellisé, M., Fernández, N., Zarraquiños, S., Núñez, H., Álvarez‐García, V., et al. (2023) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m22-2619 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Ozyoruk, K. B., Can, S., Darbaz, B., Başak, K., Demir, D., Gokceler, G. I., Serin, G., Hacisalihoglu, U. P., Kurtuluş, E., Lu, M. Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00952-9 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Revolutionizing radiation therapy: the role of AI in clinical practice
Kawamura, M., Kamomae, T., Yanagawa, M., Kamagata, K., Fujita, S., Ueda, D., Matsui, Y., Fushimi, Y., Fujioka, T., Nozaki, T., et al. (2024) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1093/jrr/rrad090 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Ahmad, A., Wilson, A., Haycock, A., Humphries, A., Monahan, K., Suzuki, N., Thomas-Gibson, S., Vance, M., Bassett, P., Thiruvilangam, K., et al. (2023) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/a-1966-0661 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Genome-wide mapping of somatic mutation rates uncovers drivers of cancer
Sherman, M. A., Yaari, A. U., Priebe, O., Dietlein, F., Loh, P.-R., & Berger, B. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01353-8 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Guiding principles for the responsible development of artificial intelligence tools for healthcare
Badal, K., Lee, C. M., & Esserman, L. J. (2023) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-023-00279-9 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Sunoqrot, M. R. S., Saha, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., Elschot, M., & Huisman, H. (2022) · European Radiology Experimental · doi:10.1186/s41747-022-00288-8 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Machine learning in prostate MRI for prostate cancer: current status and future opportunities
Li, H., Lee, C. H., Chia, D., Lin, Z., Huang, W., & Tan, C. H. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12020289 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Regulating AI in medicine in the United States and Europe
Vokinger, K. N., & Gasser, U. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00386-z · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Machine learning for cryosection pathology predicts the 2021 WHO classification of glioma
Nasrallah, M. P., Zhao, J., Tsai, C. C., Meredith, D., Marostica, E., Ligon, K. L., Golden, J. A., & Yu, K.-H. (2023) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2023.06.002 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Chen, B., Guo, L., Cao, L., Ren, C., Wen, L., Li, K., Jia, M., Li, C., et al. (2019) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm.2019.04.23 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Li, Q., Ren, Z., Cao, K., Li, M. M., Wang, K., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj1624 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Challenges to Using Big Data in Cancer
Sweeney, S. M., Hamadeh, H. K., Abrams, N., Adam, S. J., Brenner, S., Connors, D. E., Davis, G. J., Fiore, L. D., Gawel, S. H., Grossman, R. L., et al. (2023) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-1274 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Chow, R., Midroni, J., Kaur, J., Boldt, G., Liu, G., Eng, L., Liu, F.-F., Haibe-Kains, B., Lock, M., & Raman, S. (2023) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djad013 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Karsenti, D., Tharsis, G., Perrot, B., Cattan, P., Percie du Sert, A., Venezia, F., Zrihen, E., Gillet, A., Lab, J.-P., Tordjman, G., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00104-8 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Hsu, W. W. Y., Hippe, D. S., Nakhaei, N., Wang, P., Zhu, B., Siu, N., Ahsen, M. E., Lotter, W. E., Sorensen, A. G., Naeim, A., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42343 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationChalla, B., Tahir, M., Hu, Y., Kellough, D., Lujan, G., Sun, S., Parwani, A. V., & Li, Z. (2023) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100216 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
AlDubayan, S. H., Conway, J. R., Camp, S. Y., Witkowski, L., Kofman, E. R., Reardon, B. M., Han, S., Moore, N., Elmarakeby, H., Salari, K., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.20457 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationPathologist validation of a machine learning–derived feature for colon cancer risk stratification
L’Imperio, V., Wulczyn, E., Plass, M., Müller, H., Tamini, N., Gianotti, L., Zucchini, N., Reihs, R., Corrado, G. S., Webster, D. R., et al. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54891 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Divate, M., Tyagi, A., Richard, D. J., Prasad, P. A., Gowda, H., & Nagaraj, S. H. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14051185 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Gusev, A., Shi, H., Kichaev, G., Pomerantz, M., Li, F., Long, H. W., Ingles, S. A., Kittles, R. A., Strom, S. S., Rybicki, B. A., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10979 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Khattak, A., Carlino, M., Meniawy, T., Ansstas, G., Medina, T., Taylor, M. H., Kim, K. B., McKean, M., Long, G. V., Sullivan, R. J., et al. (2023) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-ct001 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Capacity of ChatGPT to Identify Guideline-Based Treatments for Advanced Solid Tumors
Schulte, B. C. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.37938 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Radici, L., Ferrario, S., Borca, V. C., Cante, D., Paolini, M., Piva, C., Baratto, L., Franco, P., & Porta, M. R. L. (2022) · Life · doi:10.3390/life12122088 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Unger, J. M., & Fleury, M. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.74 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Real-time intraoperative diagnosis by deep neural network driven multiphoton virtual histology
You, S., Sun, Y., Yang, L., Park, J., Tu, H., Marjanovic, M., Sinha, S., & Boppart, S. A. (2019) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-019-0104-3 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Martini, R., Newman, L., & Davis, M. (2022) · Clinical & Experimental Metastasis · doi:10.1007/s10585-021-10087-x · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy
Li, G., Wu, X., & Ma, X. (2022) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.08.005 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Chuang, Y.-N., Tang, R., Jiang, X., & Hu, X. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104606 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Solving medicine's data bottleneck: Nightingale Open Science
Mullainathan, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01804-4 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Long-term performance of an image-based short-term risk model for breast cancer
Eriksson, M., Czene, K., Vachon, C., Conant, E. F., & Hall, P. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.01564 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Racial and ethnic disparities in a real-world precision oncology data registry
Cheung, A. T. M., Palapattu, E. L., Pompa, I. R., Aldrighetti, C. M., Niemierko, A., Willers, H., Huang, F., Vapiwala, N., Van Allen, E., & Kamran, S. C. (2023) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-023-00351-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Application of Information Technology to Clinical Trial Evaluation and Enrollment: A Review
von Itzstein, M. S., Hullings, M., Mayo, H., Beg, M. S., Williams, E. L., & Gerber, D. E. (2021) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1165 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck ModelsPreprint
Yüksekgönül, M., Wang, M. H., & Zou, J. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.15480 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Nam, J. G., Park, S., Park, C. M., Jeon, Y. K., Chung, D. H., Goo, J. M., Kim, Y. T., & Kim, H. (2022) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.213262 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Khazeeva, G., Sablauskas, K., van der Sanden, B., Steyaert, W., Kwint, M., Rots, D., Hinne, M., van Gerven, M., Yntema, H., Vissers, L., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac511 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Detection of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies with deep neural networks
Kartasalo, K., Ström, P., Ruusuvuori, P., Samaratunga, H., Delahunt, B., Tsuzuki, T., Eklund, M., & Egevad, L. (2022) · Virchows Archiv · doi:10.1007/s00428-022-03326-3 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A pyramid architecture-based deep learning framework for breast cancer detection
Sui, D., Liu, W., Chen, J., Zhao, C., Ma, X., Guo, M., & Tian, Z. (2021) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2021/2567202 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The impact of GDPR on data sharing for European cancer research
Lawlor, R. T. (2022) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00653-2 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Sahraeian, S. M. E., Fang, L. T., Karagiannis, K., Moos, M., Smith, S., Santana-Quintero, L., Xiao, C., Colgan, M., Hong, H., Mohiyuddin, M., et al. (2022) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02592-9 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Christensen, E. W., Waid, M., Scott, J., Patel, B. K., Bello, J. A., & Rula, E. Y. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.221153 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Clinical trial designs for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Mori, Y., Kaminski, M. F., Hassan, C., & Bretthauer, M. (2022) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00232-1 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Deep learning for colorectal polyp detection: time for clinical implementation?
Ahmad, O. F. (2020) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30431-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Jongbloed, E. M., Jansen, M. P. H. M., de Weerd, V., Helmijr, J. A., Beaufort, C. M., Reinders, M. J. T., van Marion, R., van IJcken, W. F. J., Sonke, G. S., Konings, I. R., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37409-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Computer-aided detection in real-world colonoscopy: enhancing detection or offering false hope?
Misawa, M., Kudo, S.-E., & Mori, Y. (2023) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00166-8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Representing visual classification as a linear combination of wordsPreprint
Agarwal, S. K., Semenov, Y. R., & Lotter, W. E. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.10933 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
20 of the 210 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Devlin, 2019, Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, 4171
- Brown, 2020, Language models are few-shot learners, 1877
- Kim, 2018, Interpretability beyond feature attribution: quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (TCAV), 2668
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hsu, C.-Y., Askar, S., Alshkarchy, S. S., Nayak, P. P., Attabi, K. A. L., Khan, M. A., Mayan, J. A., Sharma, M. K., Islomov, S., & Soleimani Samarkhazan, H. (2025) · Clinical and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10238-025-01965-9 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“Emerging solutions include the development of “fed - erated regulatory sandboxes” that permit provisional model validation under harmonized international guidelines [ 73].”
AI-driven biomarker discovery: enhancing precision in cancer diagnosis and prognosis
Alum, E. U. (2025) · Discover Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12672-025-02064-7 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Current Bioinformatics Tools in Precision Oncology
Wolde, T., Bhardwaj, V., & Pandey, V. (2025) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70243 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Using mathematical modelling and AI to improve delivery and efficacy of therapies in cancer
Harkos, C., Hadjigeorgiou, A. G., Voutouri, C., Kumar, A. S., Stylianopoulos, T., & Jain, R. K. (2025) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-025-00796-w · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“Over the past decade, AI has emerged as a powerful tool in oncology, leveraging vast datasets to improve cancer detection, prognosis and drug discovery 34 (Fig.”
How AI is used in FDA-authorized medical devices: a taxonomy across 1,016 authorizations
Singh, R., Bapna, M., Diab, A. R., Ruiz, E. S., & Lotter, W. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01800-1 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationSurface engineering of nanoparticles for precision medicine
Zheng, J., Sun, Y., Shen, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2025) · Precision medicine and engineering. · doi:10.1016/j.preme.2025.100037 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in cancer: applications, challenges, and future perspectives
Cheng, H., & Shi, S.-S. (2025) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02450-3 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“Additionally, FDA-approved AI algorithms have been developed to facilitate the interpretation of MRI (DEN1700, RRID:SCR_012945) and breast ultrasound examinations (K190442, K210670, P150043; RRID:SCR_012945) [78].”
ESMO guidance on the use of Large Language Models in Clinical Practice (ELCAP)
Wong, E. Y. T., Verlingue, L., Aldea, M., Franzoi, M. A., Umeton, R., Halabi, S., Harbeck, N., Indini, A., Prelaj, A., Romano, E., et al. (2025) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.09.001 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Khan, S. N., Danishuddin, Khan, M. W. A., Guarnera, L., & Akhtar, S. M. F. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1743921 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“In oncology, AI has been utilized to guide treatment decisions by analyzing genomic alterations in tumors and suggesting targeted therapies that have the highest likelihood of success based on molecular profiling (Luchini et al., 2021; Lotter et al., 2024).”
A bibliometric analysis of the advance of artificial intelligence in medicine
Lin, M., Lin, L., Lin, L., Lin, Z., & Yan, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1504428 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“This bibliometric study aids researchers in identifying the present state and developing trends in medical AI and is beneficial for optimizing medical resource use and enhancing patients’ quality of life.”
Exploring AI Approaches for Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Review Article
Ali, A., Alghamdi, M., Marzuki, S., Din, T. A. D. A. T., Yamin, M. S., Alrashidi, M., Alkhazi, I. S., & Ahmed, N. (2025) · Breast Cancer Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/bctt.s550307 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“103 Despite these advancements, the successful implementation of AI in clinical practice requires addressing challenges related to data quality, extensive validation, and regulation.”
Srivastav, A. K., Singh, A., Singh, S., Rivers, B. M., Lillard, J. W., & Singh, R. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17172866 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“Additionally, the emergence of environmental and lifestyle-based AI prevention strategies will allow for proactive rather than reactive cancer care, thereby improving population-wide cancer outcomes while addressing healthcare inequities [60].”
Global Oncology: Tackling Disparities and Promoting Innovations in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Barragán-Carrillo, R., Asirwa, F. C., Dienstmann, R., Pendhakar, D., & Ruíz‐García, E. (2025) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk-25-473930 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
OpenAI’s GPT-4o in surgical oncology: Revolutionary advances in generative artificial intelligence
Zhu, N., Zhang, N., Shao, Q., Cheng, K., & Wu, H. (2024) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114132 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Norouzkhani, N., Mobaraki, H., Varmazyar, S., Zaboli, H., Mohamadi, Z., Nikeghbali, G., Bagheri, K., Marivany, N., Najafi, M., Varjovi, M. N., et al. (2025) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/s12876-025-03884-1 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Ethical considerations, such as data privacy and the potential misuse of genetic information, also need to be addressed [34, 35].”
Pang, E. P. P., Tan, H. Q., Wang, F., Niemelä, J., Bolard, G., Ramadan, S., Kiljunen, T., Capala, M. E., Petit, S., Seppälä, J., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01624-z · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Precision Oncology: Current Landscape, Emerging Trends, Challenges, and Future Perspectives
Qiao, D., Wang, R. C., & Wang, Z. (2025) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells14221804 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Li, H., Huang, J., Liu, K., Liu, J., Liu, Q., Zhou, Z., Zong, Z., & Mao, S. (2025) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110096 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
An MRI–pathology foundation model for noninvasive diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer
Shao, L., Liang, C., Yan, Y., Zhu, H., Jiang, X., Bao, M., Zang, P., Huang, X., Zhou, H., Nie, P., et al. (2025) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-025-01041-x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Despite the ongoing ethical and legal concerns surrounding AI-based predictive models 53 , MRI-PTPCa demonstrated robust potential for clinical application.”
Potential application of artificial intelligence in cancer therapy
Riaz, I. B., Khan, M. A., & Haddad, T. C. (2024) · Current Opinion in Oncology · doi:10.1097/cco.0000000000001068 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Towards understanding cancer dormancy over strategic hitching up mechanisms to technologies
Yang, S., Seo, J., Choi, J., Kim, S.-H., Kuk, Y., Park, K. C., Kang, M., Byun, S., & Joo, J. (2025) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02250-9 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Xu, H., Gong, T., Song, X., Chen, Q., Bao, Q., Yao, W., Xie, M.-M., Li, C., Grzegorzek, M., Shi, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/53567 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Multi-modal fusion foundation models are emerging, integrating information from multiple imaging modalities like CT, MRI, and PET to enhance diagnostic accuracy and reliability [200].”
Artificial Intelligence for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Treatment
Song, B., Yadav, I. S., Tsai, J., Madabhushi, A., & Kann, B. H. (2025) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk-25-472464 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Evaluation of deepseek, gemini, ChatGPT-4o, and perplexity in responding to salivary gland cancer
Bashah, A., Salem, A., Al-waqeerah, A., Ghaleb, E., Wahan, N., Awad, A. M., Altos, O., & Chen, G. (2025) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-025-06726-4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“AI-driven algorithms are now widely used in radiodiag-nosis to improve imaging accuracy [36], in radiotherapy for precise tumor targeting, and in predicting patient responses to chemotherapy and immunotherapy [37, 38].”
Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review
Mastro, A. L., Grassi, E., Berritto, D., Russo, A., Reginelli, A., Guerra, E., Grassi, F., & Boccia, F. (2024) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-024-01702-4 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Omoush, S. A., Alzyoud, J. A. M., El-Omari, N. K. T., & Alzyoud, A. J. A. (2026) · Journal of Molecular Pathology · doi:10.3390/jmp7010002 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Additionally, slides with immunofluorescence (IF) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) should be scanned promptly due to their technical sensitivities and the combination of technical expertise and specific protocols to generate their use [35,66,73].”
Cheng, H., & Wong, C. C. (2025) · Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13046-025-03592-4 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Since treat-ment decisions in BC often depend on the detection of these lesions [33, 34].”
Kim, D. J. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27020875 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
MicroRNAs in oncology: a translational perspective in the era of AI
Jurj, A. M., Dragomir, M. P., Li, Z., & Calin, G. A. (2026) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-025-01114-x · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Molero, A., Hernández, S., Alonso, M., Peressini, M., Curto, D., López‐Ríos, F., & Conde, E. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp-2024-209766 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges
Wang, M., Chang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70460 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Federated learning in oncology: Bridging artificial intelligence innovation and privacy protection
Qi, X., Xu, T., Dang, C., Qi, Z., Meng, L., & Yu, H. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2026.104154 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Xu, M., Chen, Y., Wu, T., Chen, Y., Zhuang, W., Huang, Y.-H., & Chen, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1456144 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Generative AI in oncological imaging: Revolutionizing cancer detection and diagnosis
Singh, Y., Hathaway, Q. A., & Erickson, B. J. (2024) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.28640 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment
Yuan, S., Guo, L., & Xu, F. (2025) · International Urology and Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s11255-025-04878-4 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Breast Cancer: Molecular Pathogenesis, Targeted Therapy, Screening, and Prevention
Lei, H., Fu, J., Gu, W., Qiao, H., Guo, H., Chen, Z., Wang, S. M., & Chen, T. (2026) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70560 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Convergence of machine learning and genomics for precision oncology
Reardon, B. M., Culhane, A. C., & Allen, E. M. V. (2026) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-025-00897-6 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“However, programmatic approaches and machine learning models designed to match patients to clinical trials based on genomic data have been largely unsuccessful to date, aside from a few localized exceptions at single institutions 25,63,64 .”
Self-citationClinical and Pathological Staging Discrepancies in Laryngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review
Pecorari, G., Lorenzi, A., Caria, M., et al. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17030455 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…for addressing the persistent challenge of staging discrepancies in LSCC. Emerging tools such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer a transformative opportunity to bridge this gap by providing objective, data-driven assessments that complement clinical expertise [50–52].”
Prospects of engineered bacteria-assisted CAR T Cell therapy in gastrointestinal cancers
Zhang, Q., Song, X., Liu, J., & Zhou, X. (2025) · Oncology Reviews · doi:10.3389/or.2025.1581856 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Advanced AI-based technologies for early detection and personalized management of cervical cancer
Zhang, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, Z., Zhou, K., Zhu, Y., & Yu, X. (2025) · Biomedical Technology · doi:10.1016/j.bmt.2025.100100 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Protein and Peptide in Cancer Research: From Biomarker to Biotherapeutics
Seo, J. H., Shin, S., Woo, H. R., An, Y., Youn, A., Kim, S.-Y., Ki, M., & Pack, S. P. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17183031 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Nonetheless, challenges such as algorithm trans-parency, data security, and training bias remain critical concerns that must be addressed for broader clinical adoption [253,254].”
Zhao, L., Liu, X., & Deng, X. (2025) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03947-1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Data standardization and sharing represent one of the key bottlenecks limiting the application of AI in cancer diagnosis and treatment [74].”
Borat, S., & Chowdhury, S. (2026) · In Silico Research in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.insi.2026.100265 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecologic Oncology Decision-Making: A Feasibility Study
Psilopatis, I., Sipulina, N., Stuebs, F. A., Heindl, F., Poeschke, P., Bader, S., Krueckel, A., Fasching, P. A., Beckmann, M. W., & Emons, J. (2025) · Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · doi:10.1159/000544751 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Emerging Strategies of Cell and Gene Therapy Targeting Tumor Immune Microenvironment
Wang, R., Duan, X., Li, J., Zhang, C., & Shen, L. (2025) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-4308 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Biswas, I. (2025) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2025-110913 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
RetractedEnhancing Clinical Cancer Research Through Sharing of Data and Biospecimens
Wildiers, H., Adam, V. S., O’Reilly, S., Cauwenberge, J. V., Arahmani, A., Arteaga, C. L., Bedard, P. L., Bliss, J. M., Boussis, P., Brain, E. G. C., et al. (2025) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.5376 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Chang, L., Li, H., Wu, W., Liu, X., Yan, J., Chen, Z., Wu, H., & Song, S. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-07591-z · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Zhan, Z., Chen, B., Cheng, H. W., et al. (2024) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-024-12303-9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery
Kuno, M., Osumi, H., Udagawa, S., Yoshikawa, K., Ooki, A., Shinozaki, E., Ishikawa, T., Oba, J., Yamaguchi, K., & Sakurada, K. (2025) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol32110588 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“However, this progress has also produced a vast, heterogeneous body of patient data that exceeds clinicians’ capacity to analyze and interpret [1,2].”
Ansarian, M. A., Fatahichegeni, M., Xu, R., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Ren, J., & Liu, H. (2025) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.3601 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A multi-modal approach for decision making in bladder cancer
Al-Sattar, H., Ding, H., Okoli, O., Okoli, S., Ghose, A., Banna, G. L., Wan, S., Haroon, A., Wong, J., Teoh, J. Y., et al. (2026) · Nature Reviews Urology · doi:10.1038/s41585-025-01122-7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sharma, N. K., & Sarode, S. C. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16213646 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Zhu, X., Li, Z. A., Wu, J., Chen, J., Yang, H., Zhang, S., Wang, K., & Zeng, S. (2024) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100648 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: A focus on the best practices
Haddiya, I., & Ramdani, S. (2024) · ITM Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/itmconf/20246902010 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“These innovations extend to other areas such as cardiology and neurology, where AI supports the development of personalized medicine by combining clinical and multi-omics data [52,58].”
Wei, Q., Chi, L., Li, M., et al. (2025) · International Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.2147/ijgm.s507100 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Key considerations when implementing new diagnostic technologies in routine practice
Lennerz, J. K. (2024) · Die Pathologie · doi:10.1007/s00292-024-01396-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Advancements in the Application of the Intersection of Medicine and Engineering in Cancer Research
Chen, H., Zhang, G.-M., Qian, Y., Yang, P., Li, X., Wang, J., Wang, J., Hu, Y.-X., Xiao, H., Zhong, Q., et al. (2025) · Cancer Nexus · doi:10.1002/cnx2.70003 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
New implementation of data standards for AI in oncology: Experience from the EuCanImage project
García‐Lezana, T., Bobowicz, M., Frid, S. A., et al. (2024) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giae101 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Quantum Oncology: The Applications of Quantum Computing in Cancer Research
Li, J., Li, L., Liu, N., Xu, F., Hu, T., & Yuan, S. (2025) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-025-02215-x · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Selvaraj, C., Cho, W. C. S., Kulanthaivel, L., Alothaim, A. S., Vijayakumar, R., Jayaprakashvel, M., & Desai, D. (2025) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-025-04518-9 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Song, C., Sabir, I. A., Zhao, W., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1678483 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Sweileh, M. W. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251393286 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zehra, T., Koopaie, M., Fatima, N., Rashid, G., Hasan, I., & Siddiqui, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2026.1749586 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Beyond detection, miRNA profiles encode information about tumor aggressiveness, disease progression, and patient outcomes (Lotter et al., 2024).”
InfluentialLiu, Z., Gu, W., Wan, F., et al. (2025) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-025-14354-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Cooley, M. E., Lenert, L. A., Abrahm, J. L., & Lobach, D. F. (2025) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151937 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Olawade, D. B., Ojo, I. O., Oisakede, E. O., Joel-Medewase, V. I., & Wada, O. Z. (2025) · Journal of Cancer Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100626 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Tene, T., Vique López, D. F., Valverde Aguirre, P. E., & Serrano Avalos, K. V. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1764390 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Integrating mHealth Innovations into Decentralized Oncology Trials
ÇİÇİN, F. N., & Çiçin, İ. (2025) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-025-02233-9 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“These predictive models allow clinicians to intervene proactively, reducing complications and improving patient outcomes (83).”
Filippi, L., Bianconi, F., Ferrari, C., Linguanti, F., Battisti, C., Urbano, N., Minestrini, M., Messina, S. G., Buci, L., Baldoncini, A., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-025-07508-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Supervised machine learning (ML) techniques, in particular, can integrate multiple quantitative PET features to support lesion characterisation [9, 10 ].”
Reimagining cancer treatments in the era of generative AI
Derbal, Y. (2025) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076251394631 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
İsmayılov, R., Altundağ, Ö., & Akçalı, Z. (2025) · Immunotherapy · doi:10.1080/1750743x.2025.2580272 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
AI and human expertise in cancer care — striving for synergy
Patel, M., Dee, E. C., & Lee, N. Y. (2025) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-025-01108-9 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Navigating the complexities of artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a dual perspective
Levin, G., Piedimonte, S., & Zand, B. (2024) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005691 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Doğan, İ., Karadeniz, P. G., Berk, İ., & İPEK, B. (2024) · European Journal of Therapeutics · doi:10.58600/eurjther2569 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gupta, A. A., Bajaj, S., Nema, P., Purohit, A., Kashaw, V., Soni, V., & Kashaw, S. K. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109918 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
AI in optimized cancer treatment: laying the groundwork for interdisciplinary progress
Kalweit, G., Ullrich, E., Boedecker, J., Mertelsmann, R., & Kalweit, G. (2025) · Oxford Open Immunology · doi:10.1093/oxfimm/iqaf004 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Role of AI in Clinical Trial Design and Scientific Writing.
Antonakea, N. K., Chapiro, J., & Geschwind, J. (2025) · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00270-025-04171-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence for immunotherapy response assessment in lung cancer using PET/CT reports
İsmayılov, R., Altundağ, Ö., Gençoğlu, E. A., Aktaş, A., Alparslan, S., Özçiçek, A., Turhanoglu, D., Oğuz, A., Farzaliyeva, A., Ramazanoğlu, M. N., et al. (2025) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-025-01840-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The application of AI in radiology and nuclear medicine has garnered significant interest for its potential to augment human expertise in tasks, such as lesion detection, treatment response evaluation, and outcome prediction 1,2 .”
Sun, M., Yu, J., Long, Z., Yang, Y., Xiao, T., Liang, J., Feng, J., Deng, H., & Huang, G. (2026) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/77699 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Finally, although multicenter data improved external validity, further validation through prospective observational designs or randomized controlled trials is necessary to robustly establish the real-world clinical utility of LLMs in psychiatric diagnostic workflows [31].”
Li, Y., Shi, J., Wang, Y., et al. (2026) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2026.109739 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Khumalo, A. C., & Alaqra, A. S. (2026) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/83240 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“While several researchers highlight the importance of seamless integration into existing workflows, institutions may need to embrace structural changes and new clinical workflows [42].”
Bridging the Trust Gap in Artificial Intelligence for Health care: Lessons from Clinical Oncology
Cooney-Waterhouse, T., Wanmei Ou, A., Mukherji, S., Frytak, J. R., Saha, P., & Waterhouse, D. M. (2025) · AI in Precision Oncology · doi:10.1089/aipo.2025.0001 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Anokwuru, E. A., & Emmauel, I. (2025) · International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology. · doi:10.38124/ijsrmt.v4i2.1011 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ajibade, V., & Madu, C. S. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.85024 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
New implementation of data standards for AI in oncology. Experience from the EuCanImage projectPreprint
García‐Lezana, T., Bobowicz, M., Frid, S. A., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.03.15.24303032 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Clinical evaluation of GenAI adaptive cancer therapy
Derbal, Y. (2025) · EngMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.engmed.2025.100116 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
CRISPR–mRNA synergy: toward adaptive cancer immunotherapy
Tanrıverdi, Ö. (2025) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1080/14737140.2025.2610271 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lv, D., Wang, S., Xiao, W., Xu, J., & Jin, Y. (2026) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2026.189562 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Correia, G. S. D. C., Hazim, A. Z., Zheng-Lin, B., Gannon, N., Boyle, A. W. R., Crowe, S., Jones, J. C., & Manochakian, R. (2026) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci-25-00296 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ma, C., Zhou, H., 滕竞飞, Wang, R., Zhao, F., Zhou, W., Guan, Y., Wu, Z., Li, S., Ai, X., et al. (2026) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6c00220 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Clinical Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities
Parkinson, G., Patel, R. D., Bergstrom, C. P., Vadasz, B., Amgad, M., Cooper, L. A. D., Sparano, J. A., & Lu, J. (2026) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk-26-520716 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sisca, L., Polito, M. G., Sisca, E., Iuliani, M., Cortellini, A., Vincenzi, B., Tonini, G., & Pantano, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1850705 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models in Clinical Oncology
Yu, Y., Zhao, Z., Wang, Z., Lin, R., Tan, Y., Chen, Y., Li, T., Baptista‐Hon, D. T., Zhang, X., Wu, C., et al. (2026) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70833 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Qiu, Z., Yu, S., Lou, Y., Ma, X., & Feng, X. (2025) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/10732748251330693 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Rudroff, T. (2025) · Infectious Disease Reports · doi:10.3390/idr17020033 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“These systems can now process continuous data streams from multiple sources, providing early warning of potential complications and enabling more timely therapeutic interventions [74,75].”
AI-Driven Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Cancer
Rubio-Martín, S., García-Ordás, M. T., Fontecha, D. C., López-González, L., Alonso-Oláiz, G., Crespo-Álvaro, A., & Benítez‐Andrades, J. A. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms65348.2025.00064 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Current status and prospects of minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery
Li, J., & Chen, P. (2024) · Intelligent Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.isurg.2024.07.001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kai, J., Liu, X., Wu, M., Liu, P., Lin, M., Yang, H., & Zhao, Q. (2025) · Personalized Medicine · doi:10.1080/17410541.2024.2447224 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Foundation Model for Prostate Radiotherapy Segmentation
Doucette, M., Liao, C.-Y., Lin, M., Jiang, S. B., Nguyen, D. T. D., & Yang, D. X. (2026) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci-25-00150 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lotter, W., Hassett, M. J., Schultz, N., Kehl, K. L., Van Allen, E. M., & Cerami, E.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Corresponding author
- Cerami, Ethan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Discovery
- Published
- 2024-03-21
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 711-726
- ISSN
- 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8290
- PMC
- PMC11131133
- OpenAlex
- W4394695940
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 210
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 17
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Mark Foundation For Cancer Research (Emerging Leader Award)
- National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748, P50CA272390)
- Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation
- Ellison Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in oncology, clinical implementation of AI, cancer detection, cancer diagnosis, cancer therapy, diagnostic imaging, genomics, electronic health records, clinical translation
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review