Development of human brain cortical network architecture during infancy
Open accessAbstract
The brain's mature functional network architecture has been extensively studied but the early emergence of the brain's network organization remains largely unknown. In this study, leveraging a large sample (143 subjects) with longitudinal rsfMRI scans (333 datasets), we aimed to characterize the important developmental process of the brain's functional network architecture during the first 2 years of life. Based on spatial independent component analysis and longitudinal linear mixed effect modeling, our results unveiled the detailed topology and growth trajectories of nine cortical functional networks. Within networks, our findings clearly separated the brains networks into two categories: primary networks were topologically adult-like in neonates while higher-order networks were topologically incomplete and isolated in neonates but demonstrated consistent synchronization during the first 2 years of life (connectivity increases 0.13-0.35). Between networks, our results demonstrated both network-level connectivity decreases (-0.02 to -0.64) and increases (0.05-0.18) but decreasing connections (n = 14) dominated increasing ones (n = 5). Finally, significant sex differences were observed with boys demonstrating faster network-level connectivity increases among the two frontoparietal networks (growth rate was 1.63e-4 per day for girls and 2.69e-4 per day for boys, p < 1e-4). Overall, our study delineated the development of the whole brain functional architecture during the first 2 years of life featuring significant changes of both within- and between-network interactions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Progressive maturation of primary functional networks has been shown in human fetuses and in premature infants before term age.
“Progressive maturation of these primary networks has been shown in human fetuses94 and in premature infants before term age88, 89,89”
From Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood (2018) · cites this paper as [89]
Primary functional networks, including sensorimotor, visual and auditory networks, develop first and show adult-like topologies in premature babies at term age and in full-term newborns.
“Specifically, primary functional networks, including the sensorimotor, visual, and auditory networks, develop first and show adult-like topologies in premature babies at term age86, 89, 92, 93 and in full-term newborns6, 90, 91.”
From Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood (2018) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 356
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Power JD Barnes KA Snyder AZ Schlaggar BL Petersen SE 2013 Steps toward optimizing motion artifact removal in functional connectivity MRI; a reply to Carp Neuroimage 76 439 441 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.017 22440651 PMC3834590 · DOI
- Prechtl HFR 1989 Fetal Behavior Fetal Neurology Raven Press New York
- Rothbart MK 1990 Regulatory mechanisms in infant development The development of attention: Research and Theory Elsevier/North-Holland Amstardam
- Authors
- Gao, W., Alcauter, S., Smith, J. K., Gilmore, J. H., & Lin, W.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Wei
- Venue
- Brain Structure and Function
- Published
- 2014-01-28
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1173-1186
- ISSN
- 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
- 1863-2661
- PMC
- PMC4850360
- OpenAlex
- W1967353501
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Foundation of Hope for Research and Treatment of Mental Illness
- National Institutes of Health
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH070890, P50MH064065, R01MH060352, R01MH070890)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS055754)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD053000)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cortical development, infancy, functional connectivity, network topology, sex differences, frontoparietal network, neonates, resting-state fMRI
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Linear Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review