Cited by 38Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Intratumor heterogeneity and tissue distribution of KRAS mutation in non-small cell lung cancer: implications for detection of mutated KRAS oncogene in exhaled breath condensate

Open access
Kordiak, Jacek, Szemraj, Janusz, Grabska-Kobylecka, Izabela, Bialasiewicz, Piotr, Braun, Marcin, Kordek, Radzisław, Nowak, Dariusz·2019·Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mutated KRAS oncogene in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) can be a genetic marker of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a possibility of inhomogeneous distribution in cancer tissue and intratumor heterogeneity of KRAS mutation may decrease its significance. We investigated a status of KRAS point mutation and its sequence at codon 12 in 51 NSCLC patients after tumor resection. The comparison of KRAS mutation status between EBC-DNA and cancer tissue was performed in 19 cases. METHODS: Five cancer tissue samples from disparate tumor regions and one from normal lung were harvested at surgery. EBC was collected for DNA analysis the previous day. KRAS point mutations at codon 12 were detected using mutant-enriched PCR technique and pyrosequenced. RESULTS: Forty-six cancers revealed concordance of KRAS mutation status: 27 contained mutated KRAS and 19 had only wild KRAS. Five NSCLCs revealed inhomogeneous distribution of KRAS mutation. Two different mutations were found in 14 NSCLCs and the most frequent one was G12D and G12V (n = 8). No mutated KRAS was found in normal lung. The concordance ratios of KRAS sequence in codon 12 between EBC-DNA and cancer were 18/19 for NSCLC patients and 11/12 for KRAS mutation positive NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: Intratumor heterogeneity and inhomogeneous distribution of KRAS point mutation in codon 12 in cancer tissue can occur in NSCLCs. There was a high accordance between KRAS mutation status in EBC-DNA and cancer tissue in NSCLC patients what suggests usefulness of monitoring KRAS mutation in EBC-DNA as a biomarker of NSCLC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00432-018-2779-1

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutation status of KRAS gene could be heterogeneous in the same patient, leading to heterogeneous responses to K-RasG12C inhibition across individuals and in different tumors of the same patient.

    “Notably, the mutation status of KRAS gene could be heterogeneous in the same patient, which leads to the heterogeneous responses to K-RasG12C inhibition across individuals, as well as in different tumors of the same patient (Figure 3E).70,71”

    From Overcoming Resistance to Drugs Targeting KRAS Mutation (2020) · cites this paper as [70]

  • Intratumoral KRAS mutation status could be heterogeneous between primary tumor and metastases in the same patient.

    “Given that intratumoral KRAS mutation status could be heterogeneous between primary tumor and metastases in the same patient,70 immunological memory induced by combinatory K-RasG12C and checkpoint inhibition would be beneficial for patients across all stages of cancer (Table 3).”

    From Overcoming Resistance to Drugs Targeting KRAS Mutation (2020) · cites this paper as [70]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kordiak, J., Szemraj, J., Grabska-Kobylecka, I., Bialasiewicz, P., Braun, M., Kordek, R., & Nowak, D.
Affiliations
Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Corresponding author
Nowak, Dariusz
Venue
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Published
2018-10-27
Volume
145
Issue
1
Pages
241-251
ISSN
  • 0084-5353 (ISSN-L)
  • 0171-5216
  • 1432-1335
OpenAlex
W2898144613
Cited by
38
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Centre Poland (402-350-838)
  • Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi (503/5-138-01/503-01, 503/6-086-01/503-61-001, 503/1-079-01/503-11-001, 503/1-079-06/503-11-001, 503/1-034-03/503-11-001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
KRAS mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, intratumoral heterogeneity, exhaled breath condensate, liquid biopsy, codon 12, G12D, G12V, tumor markers
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma of Lung, Aged, Bayes Theorem, Breath Tests, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Codon, DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Genetic Markers, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Genes, ras, Biomarkers, Tumor, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Point Mutation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review