Cited by 40Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Canine dirofilariosis caused by Dirofilaria immitis is a risk factor for the human population on the island of Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain

Montoya-Alonso, Jose Alberto, Mellado, Isabel, Carretón, Elena, Cabrera-Pedrero, Elena Dolores, Morchón, Rodrigo, Simón, Fernando·2010·Parasitology Research

Abstract

The aim of the present study was compare the prevalence of D. immitis in dogs and seroprevalence in humans of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain) taking into consideration the four isoclimatic areas of the island. A close relationship between the prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs and the seroprevalence in humans, in each isoclimatic area, was observed. The highest seroprevalence of infection in both canine and human hosts were found in a strip of mid-range altitude with 25.47% and 30.4% in dogs and 25.66% and 29.73% in humans, respectively. The coastal zone and the highest part of the island have prevalences significantly lower. These results demonstrate that the risk of infection by D. immitis in the human population in each area is tied to the prevalence in the canine population. Physicians should be alerted to the possibility of finding cases of human pulmonary dirofilariosis amongst the inhabitants of the island.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-010-1987-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On Gran Canaria, a hyperendemic island divided into four isoclimatic areas, the prevalence of D. immitis is significantly different between canine populations, varying from 12 to 32%.

    “With only 40 km of diameter, this hyperendemic island is divided in four different isoclimatic areas depending on altitude, with marked temperature and humidity differences among them. As consequence, the prevalence of D. immitis is significantly different between the canine populations of each zone, varying from 12 to 32% (Montoya-Alonso et al., 2010b).”

    From Heartworm Disease (Dirofilaria immitis) and Their Vectors in Europe – New Distribution Trends (2012) · cites this paper as Montoya-Alonso et al., 2010b

  • In the Canary Islands, prevalences have remained similar or with slight oscillations during the last 20 years, although the presence of the parasite is reported for the first time in Lanzarote.

    “the prevalences have remained similar or with slight oscillations during the last 20 years [9,12,27,28,29], although the presence of the parasite is reported for the first time in Lanzarote.”

    From Expansion of canine heartworm in Spain (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

  • High presence of antibodies against D. immitis has been shown in inhabitants of endemic areas such as La Rioja (11.6%), Salamanca (22%) and the Canary Islands (6.4%).

    “This risk is evidenced by studies that have shown a high presence of antibodies against D. immitis in inhabitants of endemic areas, such as La Rioja (11.6%), Salamanca (22%) and the Canary Islands (6.4%) [28,30,31,32,33].”

    From Expansion of canine heartworm in Spain (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Dirofilaria immitis is a zoonotic parasitic disease mainly located in temperate, tropical, and subtropical areas of the world.

    “It is a zoonotic parasitic disease mainly located in temperate, tropical, and subtropical areas of the world [27, 30]”
  • The prevalence of D. immitis remains at 40% in Podenco Canario hounds, which are kept in poor conditions and exposed to mosquitoes without chemoprophylaxis.

    “However, the prevalence remains at 40% in Podenco Canario hounds (a native breed of hunting and guard dog), which are kept in poor conditions and exposed to mosquitoes without chemoprophylaxis (279, 282).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 40

Authors
Montoya-Alonso, J. A., Mellado, I., Carretón, E., Cabrera-Pedrero, E. D., Morchón, R., & Simón, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
  • Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
Corresponding author
Simón, Fernando
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2010-07-30
Volume
107
Issue
5
Pages
1265-1269
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W2049244175
Cited by
40
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agencia Canaria de Investigación, Innovación y Sociedad de la Información
  • Junta de Castilla y León
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
canine dirofilariasis, Dirofilaria immitis, seroprevalence, dogs, zoonotic transmission, altitude, Gran Canaria, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Antibodies, Helminth, Child, Child, Preschool, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Geography, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Spain, Zoonoses, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review