Canine dirofilariosis caused by Dirofilaria immitis is a risk factor for the human population on the island of Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain
Abstract
The aim of the present study was compare the prevalence of D. immitis in dogs and seroprevalence in humans of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain) taking into consideration the four isoclimatic areas of the island. A close relationship between the prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs and the seroprevalence in humans, in each isoclimatic area, was observed. The highest seroprevalence of infection in both canine and human hosts were found in a strip of mid-range altitude with 25.47% and 30.4% in dogs and 25.66% and 29.73% in humans, respectively. The coastal zone and the highest part of the island have prevalences significantly lower. These results demonstrate that the risk of infection by D. immitis in the human population in each area is tied to the prevalence in the canine population. Physicians should be alerted to the possibility of finding cases of human pulmonary dirofilariosis amongst the inhabitants of the island.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On Gran Canaria, a hyperendemic island divided into four isoclimatic areas, the prevalence of D. immitis is significantly different between canine populations, varying from 12 to 32%.
“With only 40 km of diameter, this hyperendemic island is divided in four different isoclimatic areas depending on altitude, with marked temperature and humidity differences among them. As consequence, the prevalence of D. immitis is significantly different between the canine populations of each zone, varying from 12 to 32% (Montoya-Alonso et al., 2010b).”
From Heartworm Disease (Dirofilaria immitis) and Their Vectors in Europe – New Distribution Trends (2012) · cites this paper as Montoya-Alonso et al., 2010b
In the Canary Islands, prevalences have remained similar or with slight oscillations during the last 20 years, although the presence of the parasite is reported for the first time in Lanzarote.
“the prevalences have remained similar or with slight oscillations during the last 20 years [9,12,27,28,29], although the presence of the parasite is reported for the first time in Lanzarote.”
From Expansion of canine heartworm in Spain (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
High presence of antibodies against D. immitis has been shown in inhabitants of endemic areas such as La Rioja (11.6%), Salamanca (22%) and the Canary Islands (6.4%).
“This risk is evidenced by studies that have shown a high presence of antibodies against D. immitis in inhabitants of endemic areas, such as La Rioja (11.6%), Salamanca (22%) and the Canary Islands (6.4%) [28,30,31,32,33].”
From Expansion of canine heartworm in Spain (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Dirofilaria immitis is a zoonotic parasitic disease mainly located in temperate, tropical, and subtropical areas of the world.
“It is a zoonotic parasitic disease mainly located in temperate, tropical, and subtropical areas of the world [27, 30]”
From Prevalence of canine heartworm ( <i>Dirofilaria immitis</i> ) disease in dogs of central Portugal (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
The prevalence of D. immitis remains at 40% in Podenco Canario hounds, which are kept in poor conditions and exposed to mosquitoes without chemoprophylaxis.
“However, the prevalence remains at 40% in Podenco Canario hounds (a native breed of hunting and guard dog), which are kept in poor conditions and exposed to mosquitoes without chemoprophylaxis (279, 282).”
From Human and animal dirofilariasis: The emergence of a zoonotic mosaic (2012) · cites this paper as [282]
Prevalences of D. immitis among canine populations differ significantly by climate zone: 25.47% in the stepparic zone, 30.4% in the mild climate zone, 13.57% in the dry desert climate zone, and 10% in the temperate cold climate zone.
“the prevalences of D. immitis among the canine populations of each zone are significantly different: 25.47% and 30.4% in the stepparic and mild climate zones, respectively; 13.57% in the dry desert climate zone; and 10% in the temperate cold climate zone (282).”
From Human and animal dirofilariasis: The emergence of a zoonotic mosaic (2012) · cites this paper as [282]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 40
- Authors
- Montoya-Alonso, J. A., Mellado, I., Carretón, E., Cabrera-Pedrero, E. D., Morchón, R., & Simón, F.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
- Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Simón, Fernando
- Venue
- Parasitology Research
- Published
- 2010-07-30
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1265-1269
- ISSN
- 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
- 0932-0113
- 1432-1955
- OpenAlex
- W2049244175
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agencia Canaria de Investigación, Innovación y Sociedad de la Información
- Junta de Castilla y León
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
- Keywords
- canine dirofilariasis, Dirofilaria immitis, seroprevalence, dogs, zoonotic transmission, altitude, Gran Canaria, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Antibodies, Helminth, Child, Child, Preschool, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Geography, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Spain, Zoonoses, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review