Cited by 54Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Genetic analysis of biological pathway data through genomic randomization

Open access
Yaspan, Brian L., Bush, William S., Torstenson, Eric S., Ma, Deqiong, Pericak-Vance, Margaret A., Ritchie, Marylyn D., Sutcliffe, James S., Haines, Jonathan L.·2011·Human Genetics

Abstract

Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) are a standard approach for large-scale common variation characterization and for identification of single loci predisposing to disease. However, due to issues of moderate sample sizes and particularly multiple testing correction, many variants of smaller effect size are not detected within a single allele analysis framework. Thus, small main effects and potential epistatic effects are not consistently observed in GWAS using standard analytical approaches that consider only single SNP alleles. Here, we propose unique methodology that aggregates variants of interest (for example, genes in a biological pathway) using GWAS results. Multiple testing and type I error concerns are minimized using empirical genomic randomization to estimate significance. Randomization corrects for common pathway-based analysis biases, such as SNP coverage and density, linkage disequilibrium, gene size and pathway size. Pathway Analysis by Randomization Incorporating Structure (PARIS) applies this randomization and in doing so directly accounts for linkage disequilibrium effects. PARIS is independent of association analysis method and is thus applicable to GWAS datasets of all study designs. Using the KEGG database as an example, we apply PARIS to the publicly available Autism Genetic Resource Exchange GWAS dataset, revealing pathways with a significant enrichment of positive association results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00439-011-0956-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 54

Authors
Yaspan, B. L., Bush, W. S., Torstenson, E. S., Ma, D., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Ritchie, M. D., Sutcliffe, J. S., & Haines, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Haines, Jonathan L.
Venue
Human Genetics
Published
2011-01-30
Volume
129
Issue
5
Pages
563-571
ISSN
  • 0018-7348 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-6717
  • 1432-1203
OpenAlex
W2031397012
Cited by
54
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Genome Canada
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG019085)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080647, T32MH065215)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS026630, R01NS049261, R01NS032830)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM010040)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
pathway analysis, genome-wide association study, linkage disequilibrium, epistasis, multiple testing correction, Paris, KEGG pathways, autism spectrum disorder, pathway enrichment
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Humans, Random Allocation, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review