Genetic analysis of biological pathway data through genomic randomization
Open accessAbstract
Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) are a standard approach for large-scale common variation characterization and for identification of single loci predisposing to disease. However, due to issues of moderate sample sizes and particularly multiple testing correction, many variants of smaller effect size are not detected within a single allele analysis framework. Thus, small main effects and potential epistatic effects are not consistently observed in GWAS using standard analytical approaches that consider only single SNP alleles. Here, we propose unique methodology that aggregates variants of interest (for example, genes in a biological pathway) using GWAS results. Multiple testing and type I error concerns are minimized using empirical genomic randomization to estimate significance. Randomization corrects for common pathway-based analysis biases, such as SNP coverage and density, linkage disequilibrium, gene size and pathway size. Pathway Analysis by Randomization Incorporating Structure (PARIS) applies this randomization and in doing so directly accounts for linkage disequilibrium effects. PARIS is independent of association analysis method and is thus applicable to GWAS datasets of all study designs. Using the KEGG database as an example, we apply PARIS to the publicly available Autism Genetic Resource Exchange GWAS dataset, revealing pathways with a significant enrichment of positive association results.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gene-set enrichment and related analyses for AGP and other ASD data sets have found significant evidence for common variants affecting risk.
“gene-set enrichment and related analyses for AGP and other ASD data sets have found significant evidence for common variants affecting risk (54–57)”
From Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [55]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Yaspan, B. L., Bush, W. S., Torstenson, E. S., Ma, D., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Ritchie, M. D., Sutcliffe, J. S., & Haines, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haines, Jonathan L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Human Genetics
- Published
- 2011-01-30
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 563-571
- ISSN
- 0018-7348 (ISSN-L)
- 0340-6717
- 1432-1203
- PMC
- PMC3107984
- OpenAlex
- W2031397012
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Autism Speaks
- Vanderbilt University
- Genome Canada
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG019085)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080647, T32MH065215)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS026630, R01NS049261, R01NS032830)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM010040)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- pathway analysis, genome-wide association study, linkage disequilibrium, epistasis, multiple testing correction, Paris, KEGG pathways, autism spectrum disorder, pathway enrichment
- MeSH terms
- Autistic Disorder, Humans, Random Allocation, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review