Cited by 71Selenium in Biological SystemsInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlRangeland and Wildlife Management

The role of selenium in protecting plants against prairie dog herbivory: implications for the evolution of selenium hyperaccumulation

Quinn, Colin F., Freeman, John L., Galeas, Miriam L., Klamper, Erin M., Pilon-Smits, Elizabeth A. H.·2008·Oecologia

Abstract

Some plants can hyperaccumulate the element selenium (Se) up to 10,000 mg Se kg(-1) dry weight. Hyperaccumulation has been hypothesized to defend against herbivory. In laboratory studies high Se levels protect plants from invertebrate herbivores and pathogens. However, field studies and mammalian herbivore studies that link Se accumulation to herbivory protection are lacking. In this study a combination of field surveys and manipulative field studies were carried out to determine whether plant Se accumulation in the field deters herbivory by black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). The Se hyperaccumulator Astragalus bisulcatus (two-grooved milkvetch) occurs naturally on seleniferous soils in the Western USA, often on prairie dog colonies. Field surveys have shown that this Se hyperaccumulator is relatively abundant on some prairie dog colonies and suffers less herbivory than other forb species. This protection was likely owing to Se accumulation, as judged from subsequent manipulative field experiments. When given a choice between pairs of plants of the Se hyperaccumulator Stanleya pinnata (prince's plume) that were pretreated with or without Se, prairie dogs preferred to feed on the plants with low Se; the same results were obtained for the non-hyperaccumulator Brassica juncea (Indian mustard). Plants containing as little as 38 mg Se kg(-1) DW were protected from herbivory. Taken together these results shed light on the functional significance of Se hyperaccumulation and the possible selection pressures driving its evolution. They also have implications for the use of plants in Se phytoremediation, or as Se-fortified crops.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00442-007-0907-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinn, C. F., Freeman, J. L., Galeas, M. L., Klamper, E. M., & Pilon-Smits, E. A. H.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Venue
Oecologia
Published
2007-11-16
Volume
155
Issue
2
Pages
267-275
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W2147252160
Cited by
71
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oecologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Selenium in Biological Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
selenium hyperaccumulation, plant defense against herbivores, black-tailed prairie dog, Astragalus bisulcatus, Stanleya pinnata, Brassica juncea, seleniferous soils, herbivore preference
MeSH terms
Animals, Colorado, Food Preferences, Plants, Sciuridae, Selenium, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review