Cited by 31Rangeland and Wildlife ManagementWildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Disentangling herbivore impacts on Populus tremuloides: a comparison of native ungulates and cattle in Canada’s Aspen Parkland

Bork, Edward W., Carlyle, Cameron N., Cahill, James F., Haddow, Rae E., Hudson, Robert J.·2013·Oecologia

Abstract

Ungulates impact woody species' growth and abundance but little is understood about the comparative impacts of different ungulate species on forest expansion in savanna environments. Replacement of native herbivore guilds with livestock [i.e., beef cattle (Bos taurus)] has been hypothesized as a factor facilitating trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) encroachment into grasslands of the Northern Great Plains. We used a controlled herbivory study in the Parklands of western Canada to compare the impact of native ungulates and cattle on aspen saplings. Native ungulate treatments included a mixed species guild and sequences of herbivory by different ungulates [bison (Bison bison subsp. bison), elk (Cervus elaphus) then deer (Odocoileus hemionus); or deer, elk, then bison]. Herbivory treatments were replicated in three pastures, within which sets of 40 marked aspen saplings (<1.8 m) were tracked along permanent transects at 2-week intervals, and compared to a non-grazed aspen stand. Stems were assessed for mortality and incremental damage (herbivory, leader breakage, stem abrasion and trampling). Final mortality was greater with exposure to any type of herbivore, but remained similar between ungulate treatments. However, among all treatments, the growth of aspen was highest with exposure only to cattle. Herbivory of aspen was attributed primarily to elk within the native ungulate treatments, with other forms of physical damage, and ultimately sapling mortality, associated…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00442-013-2676-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amount of browsing varies with season and availability of shrubs and other forage.

    “The amount of browsing varies with season and availability of shrubs and other forage (Bork et al., 2013; Larter & Gates, 1991; Peden, 1976; Waggoner & Hinkes, 1986; Zeigenfuss & Schoenecker, 2021).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Bork et al., 2013

  • Bork et al. (2013) found that herbivory on aspen where both elk and bison were present was primarily attributed to elk, though bison also browsed.

    “Bork et al. (2013) compared the effects on aspen of Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis) and bison where both ungulates were present. Herbivory was primarily attributed to elk, though bison also browsed.”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Bork et al. (2013)

  • Bork et al. (2013) found that physical damage and sapling mortality, including broken leader stems, were associated with bison.

    “Physical damage and sapling mortality, including broken leader stems, were associated with bison.”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Bork et al. (2013)

  • Bison were responsible for most if not all of the broken aspen saplings and many with girdled bark as well.

    “Multiple lines of evidence support the conclusion that bison were responsible for most if not all of the broken saplings and many with girdled bark as well.”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Bork et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bork, E. W., Carlyle, C. N., Cahill, J. F., Haddow, R. E., & Hudson, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Bork, Edward W.
Venue
Oecologia
Published
2013-05-07
Volume
173
Issue
3
Pages
895-904
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W2008251902
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oecologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Alberta
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
Populus tremuloides, ungulate herbivory, cattle grazing, bison, elk, deer, native ungulates, savanna ecosystems, aspen parkland, trampling
MeSH terms
Alberta, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cattle, Deer, Population Density, Population Dynamics, Species Specificity, Linear Models, Bison, Ecosystem, Populus, Herbivory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review