Cited by 45Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementEcology and biodiversity studies

Effects of bison on willow and cottonwood in northern Yellowstone National Park

Painter, Luke E., Ripple, William J.·2012·Forest Ecology and Management

Abstract

On the northern ungulate winter range of Yellowstone Park, willow (Salix spp.) and cottonwood (Populus angustifolia and Populus balsamifera) have increased in height and cover in some places since the reintroduction of wolves (Canis lupus) and the subsequent changes in elk (Cervus elaphus) behavior and population densities. However, in the Lamar Valley, an important part of this winter range, many plants are still intensively browsed and recruitment has been limited. As elk numbers have declined and their distribution has changed in recent years, bison (Bison bison) have increased on the northern range. To distinguish bison effects from those of elk, we measured browsing that occurred in summer. We found average summer browse rates of 84% for willow and 54% for cottonwood seedlings in the summer of 2010, demonstrating that bison have become significant browsers in the Lamar Valley. Plants were increasing in size except where intensively browsed by bison, suggesting that a release from elk browsing has occurred, and that a trophic cascade is occurring from wolves to plants, mediated by both elk and bison. Release of bison from competition with elk, low levels of predation on bison, and lack of opportunity for migration and range expansion may be factors contributing to a high concentration of bison, with resulting effects on plant communities and biodiversity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.010

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consumptive effects of bison can be significant where bison are present in high densities year after year, as in northern Yellowstone.

    “These consumptive effects can be significant where bison are present in high densities year after year, as in northern Yellowstone (Beschta et al., 2020; Painter & Ripple, 2012; Rose & Cooper, 2016).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Painter & Ripple, 2012

  • Bison were present in large numbers on the northern range in summer, and this was when many of the aspen saplings were broken, as evidenced by attached foliage.

    “Bison were present in large numbers on the northern range in summer (Painter & Ripple, 2012), and this was when many of the aspen saplings were broken, as evidenced by attached foliage.”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Painter & Ripple, 2012

  • Only recently, as elk have decreased and bison increased, have bison emerged as an important factor affecting the dynamics of these woody plants.

    “Only recently, as elk have decreased and bison increased, have bison emerged as an important factor affecting the dynamics of these woody plants (Beschta et al., 2020; Painter & Ripple, 2012; Ripple et al., 2010; Rose & Cooper, 2016).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Painter & Ripple, 2012

  • Browsing by elk likely suppressed willows at the Mammoth exclosure.

    “Browsing by elk likely suppressed willows at the Mammoth exclosure, while browsing and trampling by bison appear to have caused a similar result at Junction Butte and Lamar Valley (Painter and Ripple 2012).”

    From Tall willow thickets return to northern Yellowstone (2020) · cites this paper as Painter and Ripple 2012

  • Browsing and trampling by bison appear to have caused a similar result at Junction Butte and Lamar Valley.

    “Browsing by elk likely suppressed willows at the Mammoth exclosure, while browsing and trampling by bison appear to have caused a similar result at Junction Butte and Lamar Valley (Painter and Ripple 2012).”

    From Tall willow thickets return to northern Yellowstone (2020) · cites this paper as Painter and Ripple 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Painter, L. E., & Ripple, W. J.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Painter, Luke E.
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
264
Pages
150-158
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028771313
Cited by
45
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
bison, elk, wolf reintroduction, trophic cascades, browsing, willow, cottonwood, poplar, Yellowstone National Park, plant recruitment, herbivore competition, predation, range expansion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review