Model-assisted Design of Experiments as a concept for knowledge-based bioprocess development
Abstract
Design of Experiments methods offer systematic tools for bioprocess development in Quality by Design, but their major drawback is the user-defined choice of factor boundary values. This can lead to several iterative rounds of time-consuming and costly experiments. In this study, a model-assisted Design of Experiments concept is introduced for the knowledge-based reduction of boundary values. First, the parameters of a mathematical process model are estimated. Second, the investigated factor combinations are simulated instead of experimentally derived and a constraint-based evaluation and optimization of the experimental space can be performed. The concept is discussed for the optimization of an antibody-producing Chinese hamster ovary batch and bolus fed-batch process. The same optimal process strategies were found if comparing the model-assisted Design of Experiments (4 experiments each) and traditional Design of Experiments (16 experiments for batch and 29 experiments for fed-batch). This approach significantly reduces the number of experiments needed for knowledge-based bioprocess development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The methodology generated independent samples from the previously established parameter sets, allowing rigorous assessment of the impact of parameter uncertainties on model predictions.
“Through this methodology, independent samples from the previously established parameter sets were generated, allowing to rigorously assess the impact of parameter uncertainties on model predictions [27].”
From Mechanistic model for HEK293 viral vector processes and its application in a digital shadow framework (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Bioprocess optimization using design-of-experiments methodology
Mandenius, C., & Brundin, A. (2008) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/btpr.67 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Mechanisms driving the lactate switch in Chinese hamster ovary cells
Hartley, F., Walker, T., Chung, V., & Morten, K. (2018) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.26603 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kuchemüller, K. B., Austerjost, J., Machleid, R., Roßkamp, A., Niemann, J., & McCready, C. (2026) · Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00449-026-03362-2
Self-citation
- Authors
- Möller, J., Kuchemüller, K. B., Steinmetz, T., Koopmann, K. S., & Pörtner, R.
- Venue
- Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
- Published
- 2019-02-26
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 867-882
- ISSN
- 1615-7591
- 1615-7605
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031B0305, 031B0577A)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review