Cited by 83

Model-assisted Design of Experiments as a concept for knowledge-based bioprocess development

Möller, Johannes, Kuchemüller, Kim B., Steinmetz, Tobias, Koopmann, Kirsten S., Pörtner, Ralf·2019·Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering

Abstract

Design of Experiments methods offer systematic tools for bioprocess development in Quality by Design, but their major drawback is the user-defined choice of factor boundary values. This can lead to several iterative rounds of time-consuming and costly experiments. In this study, a model-assisted Design of Experiments concept is introduced for the knowledge-based reduction of boundary values. First, the parameters of a mathematical process model are estimated. Second, the investigated factor combinations are simulated instead of experimentally derived and a constraint-based evaluation and optimization of the experimental space can be performed. The concept is discussed for the optimization of an antibody-producing Chinese hamster ovary batch and bolus fed-batch process. The same optimal process strategies were found if comparing the model-assisted Design of Experiments (4 experiments each) and traditional Design of Experiments (16 experiments for batch and 29 experiments for fed-batch). This approach significantly reduces the number of experiments needed for knowledge-based bioprocess development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00449-019-02089-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The methodology generated independent samples from the previously established parameter sets, allowing rigorous assessment of the impact of parameter uncertainties on model predictions.

    “Through this methodology, independent samples from the previously established parameter sets were generated, allowing to rigorously assess the impact of parameter uncertainties on model predictions [27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Möller, J., Kuchemüller, K. B., Steinmetz, T., Koopmann, K. S., & Pörtner, R.
Venue
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
Published
2019-02-26
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
867-882
ISSN
  • 1615-7591
  • 1615-7605
Cited by
83
References
2
Language
en
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031B0305, 031B0577A)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review