Cited by 420Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesBody Contouring and Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 377 of the 377 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obesity surgery: Evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)

Abstract

Background The increasing prevalence of morbid obesity together with the development of laparoscopic approaches has led to a steep rise in the number of bariatric operations. These guidelines intend to define the comparative effectiveness and surrounding circumstances of the various types of obesity surgery.Methods A consensus panel representing the fields of general/endoscopic surgery, nutrition and epidemiology convened to agree on specific questions in obesity surgery. Databases were systematically searched for clinical trial results in order to produce evidence-based recommendations. Following two days of discussion by the experts and a plenary discussion, the final statements were issued.Recommendations After the patient's multidisciplinary evaluation, obesity surgery should be considered in adults with a documented BMI greater than or equal to 35 and related comorbidity, or a BMI of at least 40. In addition to standard laboratory testing, chest radiography, electrocardiography, spirometry, and abdominal ultrasonography, the preoperative evaluation of obesity surgery patients also includes upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or radiologic evaluation with a barium meal. Psychiatric consultation and polysomnography can safely be restricted to patients with clinical symptoms on preoperative screening. Adjustable gastric banding (GB), vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) are all effective in the treatment of morbid obesity, but differ in degree of weight loss and range of complications. The choice of procedure therefore should be tailored to the individual situation. There is evidence that a laparoscopic approach is advantageous for LAGB, VBG, and GB (and probably also for BPD). Antibiotic and antithromboembolic prophylaxis should be used routinely. Patients should be seen 3 to 8 times during the first postoperative year, 1 to 4 times during the second year and once or twice a year thereafter. Outcome assessment after surgery should include weight loss and maintainance, nutritional status, comorbidities and quality-of-life.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00464-004-9194-1

Cites

377 of 377 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Items 201–377 of 377

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. DB Allison, 1996, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 20, 931
  2. T Andersen, 1987, Int J Obes, 11, 295
  3. T Andersen, 1988, Int J Obes, 12, 277
  4. ARA Ashy, 1998, Int Surg, 83, 108
  5. TH Brown, 1988, Am Surg, 54, 109
  6. L Busetto, 1997, Obes, Surg7, 505
  7. AG Delaney, 1980, Int J Obes, 4, 243
  8. K Dolan, 2004, Surg Endosc, 18, 45, 10.1007/s00464-003-8805-6 · DOI
  9. JD Douketis, 1999, CMAJ, 160, 513
  10. DR Ferraro, 2004, Clinician Reviews, 14, 57
  11. RA Forse, 1989, Surgery, 106, 750
  12. E Frimberger, 1982, Munch Med Wochenschr, 124, 39
  13. A Geliebter, 1991, Int J Obes, 15, 259
  14. L Henderson, 2003, The National Diet & Nutrition Survey: adults aged 19 to 64 years. Vitamin and mineral intake and urinary analytes
  15. JC Jan, 2004, Surg Endosc, 18, S185
  16. Jones DB, Provost DA, DeMaria EJ, Smith CD, Morgenstern L, Schirmer B (2004) Optimal management of the morbidly obese patient: SAGES appropriateness conference statement. Surg Endosc: published online (DOI 10.1007/s00464-00004-08132-00466) · DOI
  17. M Kasalicky, 2002, Sbornik Lekarsky, 103, 213
  18. JA Kieran, 2004, Surg Endosc, 18, S198
  19. DF Kirby, 1990, Am Surg, 56, 575
  20. S Kolakowski Jr., 2004, Surg Endosc, 18, S185
  21. B Krakamp, 1997, Zentralbl Chir, 122, 349
  22. K Lauterbach, 1998, Evidenz-basierte Leitlinie zur Behandlung der Adipositas in Deutschland
  23. GW Lechner, 1981, Surgery, 90, 637
  24. JI Lew, 2004, Surg Endosc, 18, S185
  25. L Lundell, 1997, Eur J Surg, 163, 525
  26. LD MacLean, 1990, Surgery, 107, 20
  27. LF Martin, 2000, Obstet Gynecol, 95, 927
  28. EM Michaelides, 2000, Am J Otol, 21, 682
  29. S Msika, 2003, J Chir (Paris), 140, 4
  30. MK Murphy, 1998, Health Technol Assessment, 2, i
  31. I Naslund, 1988, Int J Obes, 12, 503
  32. I Naslund, 1986, Complications and early results. Acta Chir Scand, 152, 681
  33. National Institutes of Health, 1998, Obes Res 6 Suppl, 2, 51S
  34. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel, 1992, Am J Clin Nutr 55, ., 615
  35. NT Nguyen, 2001, Am Surg, 234, 279
  36. SA Olsson, 1984, Int J Obes, 8, 245
  37. WJ Pories, 1981, Surgery, 90, 426
  38. D Rigaud, 1995, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 19, 489
  39. AM Rissanen, 1996, Ciba Found Symp, 201, 194
  40. DA Roe, 1985, J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol, 5, 115
  41. AJ Sanyal, 1992, Am J Gastroenterol, 87, 1165
  42. B Schirmer, 2004, Surg Endosc, 18, 1875
  43. JH Schmidt, 1988, Am Surg, 54, 269
  44. N Scopinaro, 1976, Minerva Chir, 31, 560
  45. ML Shiffman, 1993, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 17, 153
  46. ML Shiffman, 1991, Am J Gastroenterol, 86, 1000
  47. KH Stokholm, 1982, Int J Obes, 6, 307
  48. HJ Sugerman, 2003, Ann Surg, 237, 751
  49. J Svahn, 2003, Surg Endosc, 17, S228
  50. V Valley, 1987, Int J Obes, 11, 105
  51. S Weiner, 2003, Chir Gastroenterol, 19, 70

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Sauerland, S., Angrisani, L., Belachew, M., Chevallier, J. M., Favretti, F., Finer, N., Fingerhut, A., Garcia Caballero, M., Guisado Macias, J. A., Mittermair, R., Morino, M., Msika, S., Rubino, F., Tacchino, R., Weiner, R., & Neugebauer, E. A. M.
Affiliations
  • European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (NL)
  • Federico II University Hospital (IT)
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional de Huy (BE)
  • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy (FR)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Hôpital Louis-Mourier (FR)
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
  • Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Neugebauer, E. A. M.
Venue
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2004-12-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
200-221
ISSN
  • 0930-2794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2218
OpenAlex
W1977738151
Cited by
420
References
377
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 19
FWCI
14.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgical Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
bariatric surgery, morbid obesity, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, vertical banded gastroplasty, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion, preoperative assessment, postoperative follow-up, weight loss, weight maintenance, surgical complications, antibiotic prophylaxis, quality of life, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Clinical Competence, Europe, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Obesity, Morbid, Patient Care Team, Laparoscopy, Postoperative Care, Quality of Life, Gastric Bypass, Gastroplasty, Biliopancreatic Diversion, Body Mass Index, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Treatment Outcome, Nutritional Support, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review