Cited by 173Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity and Health PracticesBody Contouring and Surgery

Post‐operative behavioural management in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Rudolph, A., Hilbert, A.·2013·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Recent research has provided evidence that bariatric surgery maximizes long‐term weight loss in patients with severe obesity. However, a substantial number of patients experience poor weight loss outcome and weight regain over time. Post‐operative behavioural management may facilitate long‐term weight control in bariatric surgery population. The objective of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the effects of post‐operative behavioural management on weight loss following bariatric surgery. Eligible articles were systematically searched in electronic databases. Among the 414 citations, five randomized controlled trials, two prospective and eight retrospective cohort trials analysing behavioural lifestyle interventions and support groups fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The main finding is that behavioural management had a positive effect on weight loss following surgery. In 13 studies, patients receiving behavioural management had greater weight loss than patients receiving usual care or no treatment. A meta‐analysis of five randomized controlled trials suggests greater weight loss in patients with behavioural lifestyle interventions compared with control groups. Post‐operative behavioural management has the potential to facilitate optimal weight loss following bariatric surgery, but conclusions were limited by the small and heterogeneous samples of studies. A more rigorous empirical evaluation on its clinical significance is warranted to improve effectiveness of bariatric surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.12013

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudolph, A., & Hilbert, A.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
Rudolph, A.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-07
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
292-302
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W1526169644
Cited by
173
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2013-12-16)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
bariatric surgery, weight loss, morbid obesity, weight regain, support groups
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Life Style, Obesity, Morbid, Postoperative Period, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Factual, Bariatric Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review