Laparoscopic surgery minimizes the release of circulating tumor cells compared to open surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to determine whether tumor manipulation enhances cancer cell release from the primary tumor in HCC patients and which surgical approach, open surgery or laparoscopic resection, is superior with respect to preventing tumor cells from scattering in the blood. Methods A total of 26 HCC patients were prospectively randomized to receive either open surgery (n = 14) or laparoscopic surgery (n = 12). Blood samples were obtained at three time points: preoperative, postoperative, and 24 h after surgery. The CD45(-)/CD44(+)/CD90(+) cells were obtained and counted using quantitative flow cytometry. The serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) were also compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic and open groups in terms of patient characteristics. The levels of CCSCs increased immediately after surgical manipulation, and the laparoscopy group released fewer tumor cells into the blood stream. The amount of CCSCs in both groups decreased to reach a similar level 24 h after surgery. Both IL-6 and IL-8 increased after surgery, and the mean postoperative increases in IL-6 and IL-8 serum levels were significantly less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. The TNF-α levels showed no differences at any time point. Conclusions Our results showed that patients with laparoscopic surgery have lower IL-6, IL-8 secretion and less CTCs, which m…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The included studies were all prospective single-center observational cohort studies, except for five partly secondary analyses of RCTs with comparably low numbers of patients and potential statistical limitations.
“These studies (all published between 2001 and 2023) were all prospective single-center observational cohort studies, except for five (partly secondary analysis of) RCTs with comparably low numbers of patients and potential statistical limitations [24,25,26,27,28].”
From The Role of Perioperative Interleukin-6 Serum Levels on Liver Dysfunction and Infectious Complications After Hepatectomy—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
The review included 12 publications with a collective 589 patients, with a range of 14 to 128 patients.
“A final number of 12 publications with a collective 589 patients (range 14–128) were included in this review (Table 1) [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].”
From The Role of Perioperative Interleukin-6 Serum Levels on Liver Dysfunction and Infectious Complications After Hepatectomy—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
A laparoscopic compared to an open surgical approach significantly lowers the postoperative increase in peripheral blood IL-6 serum levels at the end of the operation and on POD1.
“Another RCT by Li et al. from 2015 (n = 26) [25] showed that a laparoscopic compared to an open surgical approach significantly lowers the postoperative increase in peripheral blood IL-6 serum levels at end of the operation as well as on POD1 (IL-6: open 116.19 pg/mL vs. laparoscopic 73.60 pg/mL; p < 0.05).”
From The Role of Perioperative Interleukin-6 Serum Levels on Liver Dysfunction and Infectious Complications After Hepatectomy—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
Allard, W. J., Matera, J., Miller, M. C., Repollet, M., Connelly, M. C., Rao, C., Tibbe, A. G. J., Uhr, J. W., & Terstappen, L. W. M. M. (2004) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0378 · Cited by 2,542 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kofler, A., Trattner, M., Mairinger, V., Urban, I., Søreide, K., Stättner, S., & Primavesi, F. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17193120 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Another RCT by Li et al. from 2015 ( n = 26) [25] showed that a laparoscopic compared to an open surgical approach significantly lowers the postoperative increase in peripheral blood IL-6 serum levels at end of the operation as well as on POD1 (IL-6: open 116.19 pg/mL vs. laparoscopic 73.60 pg/mL;…”
Influential
- Authors
- Li, W., Zhou, X., Huang, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Shang, C., & Chen, Y.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Yajin
- Venue
- Surgical Endoscopy
- Published
- 2014-12-25
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3146-3153
- ISSN
- 0930-2794 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2218
- OpenAlex
- W2018661962
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Surgical Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- National Science Council
- Sun Yat-sen University
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Keywords
- hepatocellular carcinoma, laparoscopic surgery, open surgery, circulating tumor cells, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, TNF-α, postoperative inflammation, surgical approach comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Hepatectomy, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Laparotomy, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, Neoplasm Metastasis, Laparoscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review