Cited by 46Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseCancer Cells and Metastasis

Laparoscopic surgery minimizes the release of circulating tumor cells compared to open surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Li, Wenda, Zhou, Xue, Huang, ZeJian, Zhang, Hongwei, Zhang, Lei, Shang, Changzhen, Chen, Yajin·2015·Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to determine whether tumor manipulation enhances cancer cell release from the primary tumor in HCC patients and which surgical approach, open surgery or laparoscopic resection, is superior with respect to preventing tumor cells from scattering in the blood. Methods A total of 26 HCC patients were prospectively randomized to receive either open surgery (n = 14) or laparoscopic surgery (n = 12). Blood samples were obtained at three time points: preoperative, postoperative, and 24 h after surgery. The CD45(-)/CD44(+)/CD90(+) cells were obtained and counted using quantitative flow cytometry. The serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) were also compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic and open groups in terms of patient characteristics. The levels of CCSCs increased immediately after surgical manipulation, and the laparoscopy group released fewer tumor cells into the blood stream. The amount of CCSCs in both groups decreased to reach a similar level 24 h after surgery. Both IL-6 and IL-8 increased after surgery, and the mean postoperative increases in IL-6 and IL-8 serum levels were significantly less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. The TNF-α levels showed no differences at any time point. Conclusions Our results showed that patients with laparoscopic surgery have lower IL-6, IL-8 secretion and less CTCs, which m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00464-014-4041-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, W., Zhou, X., Huang, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Shang, C., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Yajin
Venue
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2014-12-25
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
3146-3153
ISSN
  • 0930-2794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2218
OpenAlex
W2018661962
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgical Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Science Council
  • Sun Yat-sen University
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, laparoscopic surgery, open surgery, circulating tumor cells, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, TNF-α, postoperative inflammation, surgical approach comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Hepatectomy, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Laparotomy, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, Neoplasm Metastasis, Laparoscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review