The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Computer-based applications are increasingly used to support the training of medical professionals. Augmented reality applications (ARAs) render an interactive virtual layer on top of reality. The use of ARAs is of real interest to medical education because they blend digital elements with the physical learning environment. This will result in new educational opportunities. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate to which extent augmented reality applications are currently used to validly support medical professionals training. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, INSPEC and PsychInfo were searched using predefined inclusion criteria for relevant articles up to August 2015. All study types were considered eligible. Articles concerning AR applications used to train or educate medical professionals were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were found relevant, describing a total of seven augmented reality applications. Applications were assigned to three different categories. The first category is directed toward laparoscopic surgical training, the second category toward mixed reality training of neurosurgical procedures and the third category toward training echocardiography. Statistical pooling of data could not be performed due to heterogeneity of study designs. Face-, construct- and concurrent validity was proven for two applications directed at laparoscopic training, face- and construct validity for neurosurgical procedures and face-, content- and construct validity in echocardiography training. In the literature, none of the ARAs completed a full validation process for the purpose of use. CONCLUSION: Augmented reality applications that support blended learning in medical training have gained public and scientific interest. In order to be of value, applications must be able to transfer information to the user. Although promising, the literature to date is lacking to support such evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koh, G. C.-H., Khoo, H. E., Wong, M. L., & Koh, D. (2008) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.070565 · Cited by 659
An augmented reality system validation for the treatment of cockroach phobia
Bretón-López, J., Quero, S., Botella, C., García-Palacios, A., Baños, R. M., & Alcañiz, M. (2010) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0170 · Cited by 52
Cited by
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635 · Cited by 459
Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Kwok, A. P. K., Zhu, T., & Ma, X. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100429 · Cited by 281
Augmented reality in education: An overview of twenty-five years of research
Bacca-Acosta, J., Avila-Garzon, C., Kinshuk, ., Duarte, J., & Betancourt, J. (2021) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/10865 · Cited by 206
Trends and Innovations of Simulation for Twenty First Century Medical Education
Herrera-Aliaga, E., & Estrada, L. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.619769 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Barsom, E. Z., Graafland, M., & Schijven, M. P.
- Venue
- Surgical Endoscopy
- Published
- 2016-02-23
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4174-4183
- ISSN
- 0930-2794 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2218
- OpenAlex
- W2281473978
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6
- The paper
- Barsom, E. Z., Graafland, M., & Schijven, M. P. (2016). Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training. Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.