The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 152 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of immersive technology applications for medical practice and education - Trends, application areas, recipients, teaching contents, evaluation methods, and performance
Open accessAbstract
Virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and extended reality (XR) are examples of immersive technologies that have the potential to improve medical practice and education. As a result, they have recently sparked much research interest. However, there are few reviews related to the use of immersive technologies (including VR, AR, MR, and XR) in medical practice and education. Remarkably, six research questions related to the trends, application areas, recipients, teaching contents, evaluation methods, and performance remain unanswered. To this end, this study conducts a systematic review to analyse 128 articles from 2012 source papers, all of which are indexed in the Web of Science. The review results indicate that immersive technology is currently used primarily on surgery and anatomy-related subjects for doctors, medical students and interns. Furthermore, group experiments are the most commonly used data collection method. The results provide insights into the current research trends related to immersive technology applications for medical practice and education. They also serve as an essential reference for scholars in the medical practice and education contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · Cited by 4,905
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 · Cited by 3,585
Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments
Slater, M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0138 · Cited by 2,691
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2 · Cited by 1,438
Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors
Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x · Cited by 898
The state of immersive technology research: A literature analysis
Suh, A., & Prophet, J. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.019 · Cited by 841
Xie, H., Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Wang, C.-C. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599 · Cited by 713
Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training
Barsom, E. Z., Graafland, M., & Schijven, M. P. (2016) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6 · Cited by 666
Cited by
A systematic review of digital transformation technologies in museum exhibition
Li, J., Zheng, X., Watanabe, I., & Ochiai, Y. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108407 · Cited by 136
Lim, E. M. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11724-6 · Cited by 133
Extended reality technologies in adult basic life support education: a scoping review.
Fijačko, N., Metličar, Š., Janžekovič, B., Abella, B. S., Nadkarni, V. M., Chang, T. P., & Greif, R. (2025) · Resuscitation Plus · doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100927 · Cited by 5
Revolutionizing Healthcare: The Impact of Augmented and Virtual Reality (AR/VR) Technologies
Chabukswar, A., Pahuja, S., & Kulkarni, S. (2025) · Augmented and Virtual Reality in Immersive Healthcare · doi:10.1002/9781394302864.ch5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Kwok, A. P. K., Zhu, T., & Ma, X.
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 100429
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200344160
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 152
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of immersive technology applications for medical practice and education - Trends, application areas, recipients, teaching contents, evaluation methods, and performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100429
- The paper
- Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Kwok, A. P. K., Zhu, T., & Ma, X. (2022). A systematic review of immersive technology applications for medical practice and education - Trends, application areas, recipients, teaching contents, evaluation methods, and performance. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.