Cited by 25Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsOmental and Epiploic ConditionsGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

What affects the prognosis of NOMI patients? Analysis of clinical data and CT findings

Miyazawa, Ryo, Kamo, Minobu·2020·Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract

Background Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is a mesenteric ischemic disease with considerably high mortality rate, although little has been known about what factors affect the patients' prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate prognostic factors of clinical data and computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with NOMI.Methods This was a single institutional, retrospective study, reviewing 21 consecutive patients diagnosed with NOMI on angiography. Patients were divided into either ''survivor'' group or ''non-survivor'' group based on their clinical courses 1 month after diagnosis. Clinical information such as laboratory data, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and time from CT to injecting vasodilator was obtained from patients' medical records. Contrast-enhanced CT images were assessed in following items: defect of mural enhancement, pneumatosis intestinalis, hepatic portal venous gas, paralytic bowel dilatation, bowel wall thinning, and diameters of the relevant vessels.Results Eight patients belonged to ''survivor'' group, whereas eleven were allocated to ''non-survivor'' group. None of CT findings showed significant difference between survivor group and non-survivor group [defect of mural enhancement: 75% and 100% (p = 0.16), pneumatosis intestinalis: 50% and 45.5% (p = 1.00), hepatic portal venous gas: 37.5% and 45.5% (p = 1.00), paralytic bowel dilatation: 12.5% and 63.6% (p = 0.06), and bowel wall thinning: 50% and 45.5% (p = 1.00)]. The diameters of the relevant vessels did not have significant difference either. Time from CT to injecting vasodilator was revealed to be significantly shorter in survivor group [187.5 (122.5-294) min and 310 (187-925.5)] (p = 0.048). None of the other clinical information had significant difference between each group.Conclusion Prompt angiography may be a key to improve the prognosis of NOMI patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00464-019-07321-9

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyazawa, R., & Kamo, M.
Affiliations
St. Luke's International Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Miyazawa, Ryo
Venue
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2019-12-12
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
5327-5330
ISSN
  • 0930-2794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2218
OpenAlex
W2995833548
Cited by
25
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgical Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Omental and Epiploic Conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, prognosis, prognostic factors, computed tomography findings, contrast-enhanced CT, angiography, vasodilator therapy, time to treatment, pneumatosis intestinalis, hepatic portal venous gas, Charlson Comorbidity Index, mortality
MeSH terms
Data Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Survival Analysis, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review