The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wenn es persönlich wird in der „personalisierten Medizin“: Aufklärung und Kommunikation aus klinischer Forscher- und Patientenperspektive im empirisch-ethischen Vergleich
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some publications indicate that professionals expect a change in the doctor-patient relationship through PM.”
From Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
In the citing paper
“Another study suggests that the availability of large amounts of data on the patient increases the knowledge lead of the doctor, with the risk that the doctor will use this knowledge to make paternalistic decisions [56].”
From Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
In the citing paper
“The text-based education practiced in many places cannot meet these requirements [56].”
From Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Forschung : ein Handbuch
Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004) · Cited by 1,280
Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung
(1991) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111708652 · Cited by 1,125
Ghadimi, B. M., Grade, M., Difilippantonio, M. J., Varma, S., Simon, R., Montagna, C., Füzesi, L., Langer, C., Becker, H., Liersch, T., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.00.406 · Cited by 348
Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung
Matzke, S. (2004) · Öffentlichkeitsarbeit für Nonprofit-Organisationen · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-91231-2_17 · Cited by 297
S3-Leitlinie „Kolorektales Karzinom” – Aktualisierung 2008
Schmiegel, W., Reinacher-Schick, A., Arnold, D., Graeven, U., Heinemann, V, Porschen, R., Riemann, J., Rödel, C., Sauer, R., Wieser, M., et al. (2008) · Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1027726 · Cited by 274
Gollust, S. E., Gordon, E. S., Zayac, C., Griffin, G., Christman, M. F., Pyeritz, R. E., Wawak, L., & Bernhardt, B. A. (2012) · Public Health Genomics · doi:10.1159/000327296 · Cited by 175
Mayring, P., & Brunner, E. (2007) · Qualitative Marktforschung · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-9258-1_42 · Cited by 170
Sugarman, J., & Sulmasy, D. P. (2010) · Cited by 162
Jenkins, V. A., Solis‐Trapala, I., Langridge, C., Catt, S., Talbot, D. C., & Fallowfield, L. J. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.30.0814 · Cited by 147
Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening
Banks, E., Beral, V., Cameron, R., Hogg, A., Langley, N., Barnes, I. M., Bull, D., REEVES, G. K., English, R. E., Taylor, S., et al. (2001) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr418 · Cited by 132
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dowsett SM, Saul JL, Butow PN, Dunn SM et al (2000) Communication styles in the cancer consultation: preferences for a patient-centred approach. Psychooncol 9:147–156 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(200003/04)9:2<147::aid-pon443>3.0.co;2-x
- Langanke M, Lieb W, Erdmann P, Dörr M et al (2012) Was ist individualisierte Medizin? – Zur terminologischen Justierung eines schillernden Begriffs. Z Med Ethik 58:295–314
Cited by
Erdmann, A., Rehmann-Sutter, C., & Bozzaro, C. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00682-8 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Wöhlke, S., Heßling, A., & Schicktanz, S.
- Affiliations
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schicktanz, Silke
- Venue
- Ethik in der Medizin
- Published
- 2013-07-27
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 215-222
- ISSN
- 0935-7335 (ISSN-L)
- 1437-1618
- OpenAlex
- W1876572176
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Ethik in der Medizin (publishedVersion)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- personalized medicine, locally advanced rectal cancer, physician-patient communication, patient counseling, clinical decision-making, patient expectations, physician attitudes, patient perspectives, informed consent
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wenn es persönlich wird in der „personalisierten Medizin“: Aufklärung und Kommunikation aus klinischer Forscher- und Patientenperspektive im empirisch-ethischen Vergleich. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00481-013-0263-7
- The paper
- Wöhlke, S., Heßling, A., & Schicktanz, S. (2013). Wenn es persönlich wird in der „personalisierten Medizin“: Aufklärung und Kommunikation aus klinischer Forscher- und Patientenperspektive im empirisch-ethischen Vergleich. Ethik in der Medizin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-013-0263-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
