Cited by 30Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNoise Effects and ManagementVehicle Noise and Vibration Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physiological and psychological assessment of sound

Yanagihashi, R., Ohira, Masayoshi, Kimura, Teiji, Fujiwara, Takayuki·1997·International Journal of Biometeorology

Abstract

The psycho-physiological effects of several sound stimulations were investigated to evaluate the relationship between a psychological parameter, such as subjective perception, and a physiological parameter, such as the heart rate variability (HRV). Eight female students aged 21-22 years old were tested. Electrocardiogram (ECG) and the movement of the chest-wall for estimating respiratory rate were recorded during three different sound stimulations; (1) music provided by a synethesizer (condition A); (2) birds twitters (condition B); and (3) mechanical sounds (condition C). The percentage power of the low-frequency (LF; 0.05 < or = 0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (HF; 0.15 < or = 0.40 Hz) components in the HRV (LF%, HF%) were assessed by a frequency analysis of time-series data for 5 min obtained from R-R intervals in the ECG. Quantitative assessment of subjective perception was also described by a visual analog scale (VAS). The HF% and VAS value for comfort in C were significantly lower than in either A and/or B. The respiratory rate and VAS value for awakening in C were significantly higher than in A and/or B. There was a significant correlation between the HF% and the value of the VAS, and between the respiratory rate and the value of the VAS. These results indicate that mechanical sounds similar to C inhibit the para-sympathetic nervous system and promote a feeling that is unpleasant but alert, also suggesting that the HRV reflects subjective perception.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004840050036

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Yanagihashi, R., Ohira, M., Kimura, T., & Fujiwara, T.
Affiliations
Shinshu University (JP)
Venue
International Journal of Biometeorology
Published
1997-05-20
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
157-161
ISSN
  • 0020-7128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1254
OpenAlex
W2084159716
Cited by
30
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biometeorology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Noise Effects and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
Keywords
heart rate variability, subjective perception of sound, bird song, mechanical sounds, respiratory rate, sympathetic nervous system, parasympathetic nervous system, auditory stimulation, electrocardiogram, visual analogue scale
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Meteorological Concepts, Pain Measurement, Perception, Psychoacoustics, Respiration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological and psychological assessment of sound. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s004840050036
The paper
Yanagihashi, R., Ohira, M., Kimura, T., & Fujiwara, T. (1997). Physiological and psychological assessment of sound. International Journal of Biometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840050036