The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fuzzy descriptive evaluation system: real, complete and fair evaluation of students
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, when fuzzy descriptive evaluation systems were introduced, these problems were mitigated, and much more nuanced and fairer assessments were realized”
From Fuzzy Logic-Driven Assessment Model for Mathematical Proof Grading in Education (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, Annabestani et al. (2019) noted that standard four-valued logic methods led to unrealistically similar grades and errors from teachers for more systematic assessments.”
From Fuzzy Logic-Driven Assessment Model for Mathematical Proof Grading in Education (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, Annabestani et al. (2019) noted that standard four-valued logic methods led to unrealistically similar grades and errors from teachers for more systematic assessments.”
From Fuzzy Logic-Driven Assessment Model for Mathematical Proof Grading in Education (2025) · cites this paper as Annabestani et al. (2019)
Citations
Cites
Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks
Clauset, A., Moore, C., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06830 · Cited by 2,171
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Annabestani M, Naghavi N (2014a) Nonlinear identification of IPMC actuators based on ANFIS–NARX paradigm. Sens Actuators A 209:140–148 · DOI
- Annabestani M, Naghavi N (2014b) Nonuniform deformation and curvature identification of ionic polymer metal composite actuators. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 26(6):1–17
- Annabestani M, Naghavi N, Maymandi-Nejad M (2016a) Non-autoregressive nonlinear identification of IPMC in large deformation situations using generalized Volterra-based approach. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas PP(99):1–7
- Annabestani M, Maymandi-Nejad M, Naghavi N (2016b) Restraining IPMC back relaxation in large bending displacements: applying non-feedback local gaussian disturbance by patterned electrodes. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 63(4):1689–1695 · DOI
- Annabestani M, Naghavi N, Maymandi-Nejad M (2018) From modeling to implementation of a method for restraining back relaxation in ionic polymer–metal composite soft actuators. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 29(15):3124–3135 · DOI
- Annabestani M, Rowhanimanesh A, Rezaei A, Avazpour L, Sheikhhasani F (2019) A knowledge-based intelligent system for control of dirt recognition process in the smart washing machines. arXiv:1905.00607 [cs.AI] · arXiv
- Barnes J, Hut P (1986) A hierarchical O(N log N) force-calculation algorithm. Nature 324:446–449 · DOI
- Chen C-H et al (2012) Hierarchical genetic organization of human cortical surface area. Science 335:1634–1636 · DOI
- Choy SK, Lam SY, Yu KW, Lee WY, Leung KT (2017) Fuzzy model-based clustering and its application in image segmentation. Pattern Recognit 68:141–157 · DOI
- Das P, Mukherjee S (2017) Designing a fuzzy approach for modelling the performance evaluation of education service providers. Int J Serv Oper Manag 26(1):49–67
- Echauz JR, Vachtsevanos GJ (1995) Fuzzy grading system. IEEE Trans Educ 38(2):158–165 · DOI
- Felleman DJ, Essen DCV (1991) Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 1(1):1–47 · DOI · Paper page
- Hameed IA, Elhoushy M, Zalam BA, Osen OL (2016) An interval type-2 fuzzy logic system for assessment of students’ answer scripts under high levels of uncertainty. In 8th international conference on computer-supported education (CSEDU 2016), Rome, Italy · DOI
- Hatami-Marbini A, Kangi F (2017) An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for a group decision making with an application to Tehran stock exchange. Appl Soft Comput 52:1084–1097 · DOI
- Ingoley SN, Bakal (2012) Students performance evaluation using fuzzy logic. Presented at the proceedings of IEEE Nirma University international conference on engineering (NUICONE), Ahmadabad · DOI
- Jamsandekar S, Mudholkar R (2013) Performance evaluation by fuzzy inference technique. Int J Soft Comput Eng 3(2):158–164
- Jyothi G, Parvathi C, Srinivas P, Rahaman SA (2014) Fuzzy expert model for evaluation of faculty performance in technical educational institutions. Int J Eng Res Appl 4(5):41–50
- Kharola A, Kunwar S, Choudhury GB (2015) Students performance evaluation: a fuzzy logic reasoning approach. PM World J 4(9):1–11
- Liu X, Gao Z, Chen MZQ (2017) Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy model based fault estimation and signal compensation with application to wind turbines. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(7):5678–5689 · DOI
- Ma J, Zhou D (2000) Fuzzy set approach to the assessment of student-centered learning. IEEE Trans Educ 43(2):237–241 · DOI
- Nagy MT, Kos ZA, Biro D, Vicsek TS (2010) Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks. Nature 464:890–894 · DOI · Paper page
- Nunes M, O’Neill H (2011) Team performance evaluation using fuzzy logic. In: Fuzzy logic and applications, pp 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23713-3_18 · DOI
- Pangaro LN (2000) Investing in descriptive evaluation: a vision for the future of assessment. Med Teach 22(5):478–481 · DOI
- Rasmani KA, Shen Q (2006) Data-driven fuzzy rule generation and its application for student academic performance evaluation. Appl Intell 25(3):305–319 · DOI
- Wang L-X (1996) A course in fuzzy systems and control, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
- Yadav RS, Singh VP (2011) Modelling academic performance evaluation using Soft-computing techniques: a fuzzy logic approach. Int J Comput Sci Eng 3(2):676–686
- Yadav RS, Soni AK, Pal S (2014) A study of academic performance evaluation using fuzzy logic techniques. Presented at the proceedings of IEEE international conference on computing for sustainable global development (INDIACom) · DOI
- Yildiz Z, Baba AF (2014) Evaluation of student performance in laboratory applications using fuzzy decision support system model. Presented at the proceedings of IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON), Istanbul · DOI
- Zimmermann H-J (2001) Fuzzy set theory—and its applications. Springer, Netherlands · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y · Cited by 984
Barlybayev, A., Razakhova, B., Sharipbay, A., Nazyrova, A., Tursynova, N., Zulkhazhav, A., & Yelibayeva, G. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2481008 · Cited by 12
Fuzzy Logic-Driven Assessment Model for Mathematical Proof Grading in Education
Alkandari, M., & Alajmi, A. H. (2025) · European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v18i3.6257 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Annabestani, M., Rowhanimanesh, A., Mizani, A., & Rezaei, A.
- Affiliations
- Sharif University of Technology (IR)
- University of Neyshabur (IR)
- Kharazmi University (IR)
- Islamic Azad University, Mashhad (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Annabestani, Mohsen
- Venue
- Soft Computing
- Published
- 2019-05-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3025-3035
- ISSN
- 1432-7643 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7479
- OpenAlex
- W2946139234
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Edcuational Technology Systems
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- student assessment, fuzzy logic, infinite-valued logic, approximate reasoning, grading fairness, primary school mathematics, third grade, Iranian education system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fuzzy descriptive evaluation system: real, complete and fair evaluation of students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00500-019-04078-0
- The paper
- Annabestani, M., Rowhanimanesh, A., Mizani, A., & Rezaei, A. (2020). Fuzzy descriptive evaluation system: real, complete and fair evaluation of students. Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04078-0
