Cited by 1,053Avian ecology and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems

Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks

Open access
Nagy, Máté, Ákos, Zsuzsa, Biro, Dora, Vicsek, Tamás·2010·Nature

Abstract

Animals that travel together in groups display a variety of fascinating motion patterns thought to be the result of delicate local interactions among group members. Although the most informative way of investigating and interpreting collective movement phenomena would be afforded by the collection of high-resolution spatiotemporal data from moving individuals, such data are scarce and are virtually non-existent for long-distance group motion within a natural setting because of the associated technological difficulties. Here we present results of experiments in which track logs of homing pigeons flying in flocks of up to 10 individuals have been obtained by high-resolution lightweight GPS devices and analysed using a variety of correlation functions inspired by approaches common in statistical physics. We find a well-defined hierarchy among flock members from data concerning leading roles in pairwise interactions, defined on the basis of characteristic delay times between birds' directional choices. The average spatial position of a pigeon within the flock strongly correlates with its place in the hierarchy, and birds respond more quickly to conspecifics perceived primarily through the left eye-both results revealing differential roles for birds that assume different positions with respect to flock-mates. From an evolutionary perspective, our results suggest that hierarchical organization of group flight may be more efficient than an egalitarian one, at least for those flock sizes that permit regular pairwise interactions among group members, during which leader-follower relationships are consistently manifested.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08891

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning-derived knowledge can be used to infer individual decision rules in collective motion and to compute activity budgets for individuals without continuous human observation or time-consuming video analysis.

    “This knowledge can then be used to infer individual decision rules in collective motion (Katz, Tunstrom, Ioannou, Huepe, & Couzin, 2011;Nagy, Kos, Biro, & Vicsek, 2010) and to compute activity budgets for individuals without the need for continuous human observation or time-consuming video analysis.”

    From Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017) · cites this paper as Nagy et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J.L., Franks, N.R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. SelfOrganization in Biological Systems . Princeton Studies in Complexity. (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2001).
  2. [22]22. Wolfer, D.P. et al. One right, many wrongs? The role of leaders in pigeon group navigation. Proceedings of the Royal Institute of Navigation Conference, Reading, United Kingdom, Paper 31 (2005).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagy, M., Ákos, Z., Biro, D., & Vicsek, T.
Affiliations
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Vicsek, Tamás
Venue
Nature
Published
2010-04-08
Volume
464
Issue
7290
Pages
890-893
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2152132532
Cited by
1,053
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 41
FWCI
40.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Keywords
bird flocks, homing pigeons, social hierarchy, pecking order, collective motion, group flight, GPS tracking, pairwise interactions, flock size, correlation functions, homing behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Decision Making, Flight, Animal, Group Processes, Hierarchy, Social, Leadership, Locomotion, Models, Biological, Columbidae, Geographic Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review