Cited by 72Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Barriers to referral to inpatient palliative care units in Japan: a qualitative survey with content analysis

Abstract

Objectives We investigated the barriers to referral to inpatient palliative care units (PCUs) through a qualitative study across various sources of information, including terminal cancer patients, their families, physicians, and nurses.Materials and methods There were 63 participants, including 13 advanced cancer patients, 10 family members, 20 physicians, and 20 nurses in palliative care and acute care cancer settings from five regional cancer institutes in Japan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted regarding barriers to referral to PCU, and data were analyzed by content analysis method.Results A total of 21 barriers were identified by content analysis. The leading barriers were (1) a negative image of PCUs by patients and families (n = 39), (2) delay of termination of anti-cancer treatment by physicians in the general wards (n = 24), (3) unwillingness to end anti-cancer treatment and denial of the fatal nature of the disease by patients and families (n = 22), (4) patient's wish to receive care from familiar physicians and nurses (n = 20), and (5) insufficient knowledge of PCUs by medical staff in general wards (n = 17).Conclusions To correct these unfavorable images and misconceptions of PCUs, it is important to eliminate the negative image of PCUs from the general population, patients, families, and medical staffs. In addition, early introduction of palliative care options to patients and communication skills training regarding breaking bad news are relevant issues for a smooth transition from anti-cancer treatment to palliative care.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-007-0215-1

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miyashita, M., Hirai, K., Morita, T., Sanjo, M., & Uchitomi, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
Corresponding author
Miyashita, Mitsunori
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2007-02-21
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
217-222
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2038043367
Cited by
72
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
palliative care units, referral barriers, terminal cancer, advance care planning, Japan
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Family, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Referral and Consultation, Terminal Care, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review